History and archeology
In studying the history of science it is important to identify the period of its establishment as an independent discipline and criteria for its history periodization. The Siberian archeology has accumulated some experience in solving these issues (E. B. Vadetskaya, A. I. Martynov, V. I. Matyushchenko, A. V. Zhuk).
The author of the paper offers her version of determining the period of establishment of archeology as a science in Siberia, as well as more a precise determination of its specific periods.
GENERAL HISTORY
Russian history
The paper is devoted to revealing Russian historians’ points of view on the role of the 1965 reform in the development of the USSR economy. The author pays attention to the periodization of the USSR economy reform and to the role that the resolutions of the Plenum of the CPSU Central Committee of September 1965 played in this process. The author connects the formation of the historians’ points of view with the logics of Russian history development.
The author’s essential conclusion is that the most convincing point of view by the early 2000s is that the model of the Soviet society’s reform since 1965 was a failure. Another thing is that for 1965 the public consciousness could not suggest any other healthy alternative.
History of Siberia
Article contains data on the main problems of agricultural production in the territory of Kuzbass, more particularly, Kuznetsk and Mariinsk districts of the Tomsk province in the period of the 1880th – the beginning of the 1890th years. The purpose of work was to characterize a state, to track dynamics, to reveal features of functioning of agricultural economy of edge during the specified period.
Processing and the analysis of the statistical data containing in appendices to annual reports of the Tomsk governor for 1881 – 1893 as a whole allowed to designate tendencies, to define structure, to confirm essential regularities of agricultural production in the territory. In generalizing works on history of Kuzbass the corresponding subject didn't receive due reflection in this connection the presented material can be used in the educational and scientific purposes.
The conducted research allowed to come to the following main conclusions. The base of economic development of the considered district in designated time there was an agriculture. Abundance in the region enough fertile land grounds along with small number of the population and lack of a large private property on the earth promoted development here extensive refalse agriculture. The country economy, based on traditional, archaic ways of cultivation of soils, in the conditions of backwardness of means of communication and the monetary credit remained mainly natural.
In the conditions of lack of innovative methods of increase of level of productivity, the climatic and meteorological factors, therefore in Kuzbass as, actually, and in Russia as a whole, periodically there were the crop failures interfering stable development of country economy had paramount and, actually, unique value; development of agricultural production wasn't promoted in the region by lack of transport infrastructure and the commodity-money relations.
At the same time it is necessary to consider as a clear advantage of Kuznetsk and Mariinsk plowmen abundance of the free qualitative virgin lands, allowing to reap more big crops, than in the European Russia; however the specified handicap should be considered temporary as the intensive growth of the population at the expense of annual natural profit and increase in resettlement movement the region in the conditions of lack of mechanisms of an intensification of agricultural production inevitably promoted decrease in coefficient of consumption per capita that shortly could lead here to an aggravation of "a country question" as well as in the European part of the country.
The topic of intelligentsia is not new for historians. However, in present days many scientists note substantial changes in definition of its status and role.
As a result of the difficult period of social and economic transformations of the Russian society the rural intelligentsia of Kemerovo region (Kuzbass), namely teaching, medical and cultural professionals, suffered the threat of losing their position of the advanced members of the most educated and active group of rural population.
At the level of agrarian regions of the country, Siberia and Kuzbass rural intelligentsia has not been studied sufficiently.
Three periods in the development of the rural intelligentsia of Kuzbass are defined in this work: 1985 – 1991; 1992 – 1998; 1999 – 2008. Thus, in 1985 – 1991, the state gave big social importance to rural intellectuals’ work. At the same time, the intellectuals carried out huge educational and public work for fellows villagers. Then tendency for the decrease in the number of social and cultural facilities in rural regions was outlined.
In 1992 – 1998 negative tendencies and problems of the rural intelligentsia were aggravated. As a result, the professional activity and authority of teachers, workers of medicine and culture in the agrarian areas of Kuzbass continued to decrease, which led the rural population’s alienation of from traditional cultural values and strengthened a gap between the city and the village.
According to many researchers, it is considered that the period of 1999 – 2008 was the time of economic recovery and social stabilization for Kuzbass. But at those years the situation of the position of rural intellectuals didn't improve. Its professional problems received a long perspective.
A common strategy of the regional and state authorities’ actions can be a possible way to revive the status of the rural intelligentsia. There are a lot of examples on providing support to workers of the welfare (budgetary) sphere in Kemerovo region, which received further development in national projects at the state level.
There are huge opportunities and conditions for creation and implementation of the new project for revival of the rural intelligentsia in Kuzbass.
The author has practical know-how on revival of the rural intelligentsia by the example of Leninsk-Kuznetsk municipal area.
The paper addresses the issues of formation and reorganization of the structure of the West-Siberian Directorate of Civil Aviation Authorities in the mid-1960s – 1990s. The paper lists the legal acts, serving as the basis for the change in the structure of the Directorate, as well as the airlines and airports that belonged to the Directorate.
Международные отношения
The problem of NATO's crisis during the Suez crisis in 1956 (military intervention of Britain, France and Israel to prevent the strengthening of Egypt in the Suez Canal zone) is analyzed in the paper.
The author examines the position of the leading NATO countries – Britain, France and the USA – in the conflict, circumstances of involvement of Israel in the war, influence of the Soviet Union’s position and the Warsaw pact, and the possibility of using of nuclear weapons.
Special attention is paid to the danger of disintegration within NATO. The author ascertains reasons for the negative attitude of the USA to the military operation in the Middle East and their refusal to join the regional alliance under British leadership («the Baghdad Pact»). The USA position in the Suez crisis was conditioned by fear that as a result of the war the Middle East will be engulfed by anti-Western protests and it’ll be in the hands of the Soviet Union. Washington offered a peaceful resolution of the conflict, and London and Paris sought to involve the USA in this intervention. The United States were able to ensure that NATO had not played any significant role up to the highest point of the crisis. «Dialogue of deaf-mutes» during the crisis escalated in heavy quarrel between the United States, Britain and France during the war. President Eisenhower had unwittingly set NATO on the brink of collapse. However, all this was passing behind the scenes, and the public did not notice that during the Suez crisis, NATO experienced one of the worst crises of the Cold War.
ISSN 2949-2092 (Online)