Coping Behavior in Young People with Different Levels of Ambiguity Tolerance

In the modern world, the growing uncertainty becomes a challenge for coping behavior as the current global changes bring about adaptive transformations in people. One’s coping strategies depend on one’s attitude towards uncertainty, which expresses itself via the construct of tolerance / intolerance to ambiguity. Coping strategies, in their turn, define the way one’s psychological adaptation unfolds under stress. The research objective was to determine the relationship between the coping pattern and the level of ambiguity tolerance in young people. The study involved 81 people aged 17–39 (22.48 ± 5.34 y.o.). Such coping strategies as accepting responsibility, avoidance, planful problem solving, and positive reassessment demonstrated a correlation between the coping behavior pattern and the ambiguity tolerance. In some cases, the strategy of accepting responsibility lost its adaptive focus. Adaptive and maladaptive coping strategies were used to describe the relationships between the level of frustration and subjective well-being. The research revealed a strong connection between ambiguity tolerance and frustration, as well as between ambiguity tolerance and subjective well-being. The article also introduces an analysis of self-reports made by the respondents regarding their emotional and subjective assessment of ambiguity tolerance.

1. Avramova T. I. Research of frustrations at students. Problemy sovremennogo pedagogicheskogo obrazovaniia, 2020, (67-1): 274–279. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/xqcsvo

2. Andriyashina A. D., Salikhova N. R. Attitude to the situation of uncertainty: analysis of phenomenological description of postgraduates. Pedagogical education: new challenges and goals: Proc. VII Intern. forum, Kazan, 26–28 May 2021. Kazan: KFU, 2021, pt. 4, 26–32. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/rbfgis

3. Antsiferova L. I. The road to meaning. Psikhologicheskii Zhurnal, 2000, 21(4): 120–121. (In Russ.)

4. Belinskaya E. P. Uncertainty as a category of modern social psychology of personality. Psychological Studies, 2014, 7(36). (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.54359/ps.v7i36.604

5. Belinskaya E. P. Coping as socio-cultural problem. Psychological Studies, 2009, (1). (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.54359/ps.v2i3.1001

6. Belorusova E. A. Ambiguous situation as a source of personality development. Molodoi uchenyi, 2018, (50): 455–459. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/voxblm

7. Bityutskaya E. V. Difficult life situation: Cognitive appraisal criteria. Psychological Science and Education, 2007, 12(4): 87–93. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/ijfofd

8. Bodrov V. A. "Coping stress" problem. Part I. "Coping stress" and theoretical approaches to its study. Psikhologicheskii Zhurnal, 2006, 27(2): 122–133. (In Russ.) https:// elibrary.ru/htezsb

9. Butenko T. P. A measure of understanding of uncertainty in life situations and coping with them. Psychology. Journal of the Higher School of Economics, 2008, 5(2): 117–123. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/jwmczt

10. Byzova V. M., Avanesyan M. O. Experience subjective uncertainty and being ready for change. Herald of Vyatka State University for the Humanities, 2020, (3): 103–111. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25730/VSU.7606.20.044

11. Druzhinina Yu. A. Personality traits, life events, and types and strategies of coping behavior in adolescents. Russian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 2013, (1): 94–100. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/qzkqah

12. Zarzhitskaya A. S. Ambiguity tolerance in working and non-working technical university students. Fundamental and applied research: Proc. X Intern. Sci.-Research Competition, Ufa, 5 Dec 2022. Ufa: Vestnik nauki, 2022, pt. 2, 78–86. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/nnyxsu

13. Kandybovich S. L., Razina T. V., Subbotina L. Yu., Pronina N. R. Stress, caused by defending a dissertation, and its consequences. Bulletin of the University of World Civilizations, 2019, 10(3): 26–35. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/yhrbdx

14. Kolomeytzev Y. A., Korzun S. A. Basic theoretical approaches to a coping behavior. Problemy upravleniia (Minsk), 2010, (2): 226–229. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/xcnwpt

15. Kryukova T. L. A man as a subject of coping behavior. Psikhologicheskii Zhurnal, 2008, 29(2): 88–95. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/inmjah

16. Kryukova T. L., Kuftyak E. V. Questionnaire of ways of control (adaptation of a technique of WCQ). Zhurnal prakticheskogo psikhologa, 2007, (3): 93–112. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/ygcfyx

17. Lazareva E. A., Zinovieva E. V. Death attitude of the young people with a tendency to self-blame. Nauchnye issledovaniia vypusknikov fakulteta psikhologii SPbGU, 2018, 6: 79–84. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/zdkmmp

18. Leonov I. N. Tolerance for ambiguity as a psychological phenomenon: the history of a construct. Bulletin of Udmurt University. Series Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy, 2014, (4): 43–52. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/tmytvt

19. Martsinkovskaya T. D., Poleva N. S. Features of transitivity's crises during the quarantine period. New Psychological Research, 2022, 2(1): 71–87. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.51217/npsyresearch_2022_02_01_04

20. Morozova I. S., Medovikova E. A. Attitude to uncertainty in the structure of the psychological sefety of the personality of employees of industrial enterprises. The Humanities (Yalta), 2021, (2): 113–120. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/mqbbtg

21. Nartova-Bochaver S. K. "Coping behavior" in the system of concepts of personality psychology. Psikhologicheskii Zhurnal, 1997, 18(5): 20–30. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/rctpbb

22. Osin E. N. Factor structure of the Russian version of D. McLain's Multiple Stimulus Types Ambiguity Tolerance Scale-I. Psikhologicheskaia diagnostika, 2010, (2): 65–86. (In Russ.)] https://elibrary.ru/sufqlt

23. Osin E. N., Leontiev D. A. Approbation of Russian-language versions of two scales for rapid assessment of subjective well-being. Sociology and society: problems and ways of interaction: Proc. III All-Russian Sociol. Congress, Moscow, 21–24 Oct 2008. Moscow: FCTAS RAS, 2008, 3–48. (In Russ.)

24. Ostanina N. V. Theoretical bases of student’s coping-behavior forming. Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta, 2009, (1): 109–120. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/jwmtbv

25. Kharlamenkova N. E., Bykhovets Yu. V., Dan M. V., Nikitina D. A. Experience of uncertainty and anxiety in the conditions of COVID­19. 2020. (In Russ.) URL: www.ipras.ru/cntnt/rus/institutp/covid-19/kommentarii-eksp/har-1.html# (accessed 6 Feb 2023).

26. Sokolova T. E. Clinical psychology of the loss of Self. 2nd ed. Moscow: Smysl, 2019, 566. (In Russ.)

27. Trofimova E. L., Kuzmina G. A. Psychological security of a educators personality in conditions of uncertainty. The Bulletin of Irkutsk State University. Series Psychology, 2022, 39: 54–75. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26516/2304-1226.2022.39.54

28. Tserkovsky A. L. Modern views on the coping problem. Vestnik Vitebskogo gosudarstvennogo meditsinskogo universiteta, 2006, 5(3): 112–121. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/jxwtor

29. Freeston M., Tiplady A., Mawn L., Bottesi G., Thwaites S. Towards a model of uncertainty distress in the context of Coronavirus (COVID-19). The Cognitive Behaviour Therapist, 2020, 13. https://doi.org/10.1017%2FS1754470X2000029X

30. Lazarus R. S., Folkman S. Stress, appraisal and coping. NY: Springer, 1984, 437.

31. Merenluoto K., Lehtinen E. Number concept and conceptual change: Towards a systemic model of the processes of change. Learning and Instruction, 2004, 14(5): 519–534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2004.06.016

32.