Gender Stereotypes and Coping with Adversities

Women’s subjective experience of life hardships may be connected with gender self-concept and misogynistic attitudes. This empirical study of external and internal misogyny as a gender stereotype consisted of two stages. The first stage relied on such quantitative methods as scale questionnaires to identify the coping strategies, self-attitudes, and misogynistic ideas. The second stage used two qualitative methods: the free associations method helped to define the concept of adversity in men and women while the thematic analysis identified the default coping strategies in the focus group. The study involved 312 women aged 18–45 y.o. from Tashkent, Uzbekistan. The research revealed a relationship between some parameters of self-attitude and the severity of misogynistic attitudes. For example, prominent self-confidence, self-acceptance, self-guidance, and openness in communication accompanied low scores for social vulnerability, personal inferiority, and a sense of danger. Internal conflicts and self-blame corresponded with strong misogynous attitudes. In general, the gender role remained a prevailing characteristic of adversity. The adversity concept demonstrated an inner contradiction: the core concentrated on sexual and physical family violence while the periphery was more about interpersonal family relations. The thematic analysis showed that the choice of coping strategy depended on the limitations caused by misogynistic attitudes. However, the relationship between the misogynistic gender stereotyping and the choice of coping strategy proved to be ambiguous.

1. Bem S. L. The lenses of gender: Transformation of debate on Sexual inequality. Moscow: ROSSPEN, 2004, 334. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/qxlmst

2. Bendas T. V. Gender psychology. St. Petersburg: Piter, 2006, 431. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/zflhkv

3. Bovina I. B. Social psychology of health and disease. Moscow: Aspekt Press, 2007, 256. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/qxrzdz

4. Bovina I. B., Dvoryanchikov N. V., Melnikova D. V., Lavreshkin N. V. Studying social representations: an outsider’s perspective. Social Psychology and Society, 2022, 13(3): 8–25. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17759/sps.2022130302

5. Illouz E. The end of love: A sociology of negative relations. Moscow-Berlin: Direkt-Media, 2022, 352. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/tstthe

6. Kryukova T. L. A man as a subject of coping behavior. Psikhologicheskii Zhurnal, 2008, 29(2): 88–95. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/inmjah

7. Kryukova T. L., Kuftyak E. V. Questionnaire of ways of control (adaptation of a technique of WCQ). Zhurnal prakticheskogo psikhologa, 2007, (3): 93–112. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/ygcfyx

8. Malkina-Pykh I. G. Gender therapy. Moscow: Eksmo, 2006, 926. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/qlnqlr

9. Pantileev S. R. Methodology of selfattitude research. Moscow: Smysl, 1993, 32. (In Russ.)

10. Bailey M. Misogynoir transformed: Black women’s digital resistance. NY: NYU Press, 2021, 248.

11. Bates L. Men who hate women: From incels to pickup artists: The truth about extreme misogyny and how it affects us all. Naperville: Sourcebooks, 2021, 416.

12. Christopher A. N., Mull M. S. Conservative ideology and ambivalent sexism. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 2006, 30(2): 223–230. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2006.00284.x

13. Crocker J., Major B. Social stigma-and self-esteem: The self-protective properties of stigma. Psychological Review, 1989, 96(4): 608–630. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0033-295X.96.4.608

14. Folkman S. Personal control and stress and coping processes: A theoretical analysis. Journal of Personal and Social Psychology, 1984, 46(4): 839–852. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.46.4.839

15. Gilmore D. Misogyny: The male malady. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2001, 272.

16. Glick P., Fiske S. T., Mladinic A., Saiz J. L., Abrams D., Masser B., Adetoun B., Osagie J. E., Akande A., Alao A., Annetje B., Willemsen T. M., Chipeta K., Dardenne B., Dijksterhuis A., Wigboldus D., Eckes T., Six-Materna I., Expósito F., Moya M., Foddy M., Kim H.-J., Lameiras M., Sotelo M. J., Mucchi-Faina A., Romani M., Sakalli N., Udegbe B., Yamamoto M., Ui M., Ferreira M. C., López W. L. Beyond prejudice as simple antipathy: Hostile and benevolent sexism across cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2000, 79(5): 763–775. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0022-3514.79.5.763

17. Hobfoll S. E. The influence of culture, community, and the nested-self in the stress process: Advancing conservation of resources theory. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 2001, 50(3): 337–421. https://doi.org/10.1111/1464-0597.00062

18. Jackson S. J., Bailey М., Foucault W. #HashtagActivism: Networks of race and gender justice. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2020, 296. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/10858.001.0001

19. Jane E. A. "Back to the kitchen, cunt": speaking the unspeakable about online misogyny. Continuum, 2014, 28(4): 558–570. https://doi.org/10.1080/10304312.2014.924479

20. Johnson A. G. The gender knot: unraveling our patriarchal legacy. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 2014, 322.

21. Maccoby E. E., Jacklin C. N. Gender segregation in childhood. Advances in Child Development and Behavior, 1987, 20: 239–287. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1016/S0065-2407(08)60404-8

22. Manne K. Down girl: The logic of misogyny. Ithaca, NY: Oxford University Press, 2019, 368.

23. Marwick A. E., Caplan R. Drinking male tears: Language, the manosphere, and networked harassment. Feminist Media Studies, 2018,18(4): 543–559. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2018.1450568

24. Unger R. K., Crawford M. Sex and gender: The troubled relationship be-tween sex and gender. Psychological Science, 1993, 4(2): 122–124. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1993.tb00473.x

25. Viki T. G., Abrams D., Hutchison P. The "true" romantic: Benevolent sexism and paternalistic chivalry. Sex Roles, 2003, 49(9-10), 533–537. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025888824749

26. Wessinger C. Theory of women in religions. NY: NYU Press, 2020, 232.

27. Zeinert P., Inie N., Derczynski L. "Annotating Online Misogyny". Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing. Vol. 1: Long Papers, 1–6 Aug 2021. Stroudsburg: Association for Computational Linguistics, 2021, 3181–3197. http://dx.doi.org/10.18653/v1/2021.acl-long.247