Semantic Category of Otherness in American Military-Political Media Discourse

Political discourse uses the category of otherness to legitimize the actions of the government and shape collective identity. The article examines the lexical representation of the semantic category of otherness in American socio-political media texts covering the military conflict in Iraq in 2014–2017. The analysis involved 30 media texts (33,960 words) from CNN, The New York Times, and The Washington Post. As a result of processing 508 unique nouns (3,590 uses), eight lexical-semantic groups were identified as part of the category of otherness: forces opposing the Other; opposition to the Other; influence of the Other, strategies and tactics of the Other; names for the Other (opponents, enemies); objects and phenomena of the Other; victims of the conflict; psychology and perception of the Other; economic and social manifestations of the Other and their consequences. American media employ linguistic means to contrast Us and Them by selecting particular lexemes, their contexts, emotive meaning, and connotations. The semantics of otherness is manifested through the description of the conflicting sides and their actions, with an emphasis on threats, fears, and consequences for civilians. The model provides a deeper understanding of the linguistic mechanisms that form the image of the Other in media discourse and its role in shaping public opinions and political strategies. 

1. Alekseeva M. G., Frolova V. A. Dynamic processes in the oppositional system "friend-foe" (based on the story of Gunther de Bruyne "Renata"). Vestnik Udmurtskogo universiteta. Seriya: Istoriya i filologiya, 2023, 33(2): 403–409. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/dnckwy

2. Bogomazova V. V. Rituality as a way of actualizing the category of otherness within the judicial discourse. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 2. Yazykoznanie, 2014, (3): 100–104. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15688/jvolsu2.2014.3.12

3. Zenenko N. V., Chervyakova O. A. Linguo-pragmatic description of the military-political media discourse: The experience of system analysis. Voenno-filologicheskii zhurnal, 2023, (3): 29–39. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/gvvoqq

4. Zyryanov M. S., Kashpur V. V., Andreeva T. L. Lexical representation of the category "one’s own" in socio-political texts (based on the English verbs). Philology. Theory & Practice, 2019, 12(7): 188–192. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30853/filnauki.2019.7.40

5. Kalashnikova O. A., Samoylova A. V. The metaphorical potential of the English language military-political media discourse. Philology. Theory & Practice, 2024, 17(11): 4192–4199. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30853/phil20240591

6. Kiseleva S. A. "Doublespeak" and "unspeak" as types of euphemisms. Prepodavatel XXI vek, 2014, (3-2): 276–282. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/thsoer

7. Kitanina E. A., Eremenko N. G. Formation of the "own / their" opposition in contemporary orthodox discourse. Science. Education. The Present, 2024, (2): 45–50. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24412/2658-7335-2024-2-23

8. Kishina E. V. Complex research of a category "own-strange" in Russian language. Tomsk State University Journal, 2009, (320): 11–15. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/llvxwl

9. Kononova I. V., Lebedinskaya Yu. V. Ironic euphemistic units of military-political discourse as a means of manipulating consciousness in the news media. Relevant issues of modern linguistics, ed. E. A. Nielsen et al. St. Petersburg: SPbSUE, 2016, 30–34. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/wglfwn

10. Korenetskaya I. N. Metaphorical models of the conceptual opposition "us – they" in different types of discourse (by the material of the English language). Issues in Journalism, Education, Linguistics, 2022, 41(3): 569–577. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.52575/2712-7451-2022-41-3-569-577

11. Kuznetsova E. V. On the overlapping nature of lexico-semantic groups of words. Semantics and structure of the sentence: Lexical and syntactic semantics, ed. Garipova N. D. Ufa: BashSU, 1978. (In Russ.)

12. Kurbakov I. A. Hybrid nature of military and political discourse. Scientific achievements in the context of improving the quality of life and sustainable development of society: Proc. Intern. Sci.-Prac. Conf. and IV All-Russian (with Intern. participation) Conf., Almaty, 29 Apr 2019. Almaty: IWEIR RAS, 2019, vol. 3, 210–217. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/yrpshs

13. Mahmudova S. A. Representation of the conceptual opposition "friend / foe" in the novel by J. Aldridge "Mockery in arms". Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State University, 2022, (9): 153–160. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.47475/1994-2796-2022-10920

14. Mishkurov E. N. Modern military-political discourse: Nomination, functions, language deviation, translation. Lomonosov Translation Studies Journal, 2020, (2): 88–105. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/tgipab

15. Orishchenko S. S. "Own" and "others" as a subject of cultural knowledge: Concepts, images, projections and relationships. Sovremennaia nauka: aktualnye problemy teorii i praktiki. Seriia: Poznanie, 2022, (3): 20–26. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/ilvyvx

16. Paderina T. S. Representation of "friend – foe" conceptosphere in the linguistic consciousness of a bilingual (based on V. Kaminer' fiction works). Vestnik Udmurtskogo universiteta. Seriya: Istoriya i filologiya, 2024, 34(2): 497–502. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/dxexem

17. Poliantsev R. S. Stereotyping of images of "friend" and "foe" in the coverage of military conflict in English military-political discourse. In the multidimensional space of modern linguistics, ed. Suleimanov O. A. Moscow: Iazyki Narodov Mira, 2019, 233–241. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/utbnis

18. Salimova R. M. The binary opposition "own" – "alien" as illustrated by British media sphere. Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State University, 2021, (9): 158–163. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.47475/1994-2796-2021-10922

19. Trostina Yu. D. Linguistic representation of the "friend-foe" opposition in film discourse in the Downton Abbey series. Student and Science (Humanitarian Cycle) – 2022: Proc. Intern. Stud. Sci.-Prac. Conf., Magnitogorsk, 22–25 Mar 2022. Magnitogorsk: NMSTU, 2022, 754–758. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/suknme

20. Ulyanova U. A. "Forming one’s own image" communicative strategy in the English language military political discourse. Military-Legal and Humanitarian Sciences of Siberia, 2021, (4): 139–145. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/faufub

21. Ulyanova U. A. Representation of the communicative strategy "them" in English military political discourse. Foreign languages: Innovations, research and teaching prospects: Proc. VI Intern. Sci.-Prac. Conf., Minsk, 23–24 Mar 2023. Minsk: BSU, 2023, 90–96. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/horkla

22. Fomin A. G., Mavleyev R. R. Political metaphor as an effective means of influence (case study of the speeches of the president of Russian Federation Vladimir Putin and the president of the people's republic of China Xi Jinping at the belt and road forum for international cooperation). Political Linguistics, 2017, (6): 112–121. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/miotpu

23. Khomutova T. N., Naumova K. A. Military-political discourse as a distinctive type of discourse. Bulletin of the South Ural State University. Ser. Linguistics, 2017, 14(3): 49–53. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.14529/ling170307

24. Chervyakova O. A. Discursive impact of Spanish military-political media texts: Fascination, suggestion, and persuasion. Political Linguistics, 2023, (6): 141–148. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/sdgydj

25. Chervyakova O. A. Dysphemia in military-political discourse (by the material of the Spanish language). Vestnik adiunkta, 2022, (1). (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/jztssw