Career Choice Issues in First-Year Students: Cognitive Profile
https://doi.org/10.21603/sibscript-2025-27-5-947-956
Abstract
The article introduces an authentic approach to career choice studies. It relies on the following hypothesis: decision-making trends, psychological type, and cognitive profile correlate in university students. The methodology included seven techniques and questionnaires: Personal Factors in Decision-Making (T. V. Kornilova); Decision Making Tendency Inventory (A. Yu. Razvaliaeva); Melbourne Decision Making Questionnaire (adapted by T. V. Kornilova); Causal Orientation (O. E. Dergacheva et al.); Cognitive Closure Test (M. I. Yasin & O. E. Khuklaev); Career Preferences (J. Holland’s Self-Directed Search Career Assessment adapted by A. N. Vorobiov et al.); Professional and Psychological Personality Type (S. V. Dukhnovsky). The research involved 310 first-year students from the Siberian University of Consumer Cooperation, Novosibirsk. The factors of cognitive uncertainty and cognitive openness revealed some peculiarities in the relationship between decision-making, personal choice strategies, and professional and psychological personality types in first-year university students. Most of them exhibited strong open-ended cognitive traits, including constructive decision-making methods and strategies. Those with high cognitive ambiguity and poor cognitive openness demonstrated explicit cognitive closed-mindedness. These results may help to determine potential risks of cognitive deformations related to career choice in university students. Research prospects involve a deeper study into career counselling.
Keywords
About the Authors
Olga M. KrasnoryadtsevaRussian Federation
Tomsk
Scopus Author ID: 5719395360
Competing Interests:
The authors declared no potential conflict of interests regarding the research, authorship, and / or publication of this article.
Elena S. Teterina
Russian Federation
Novosibirsk
Competing Interests:
The authors declared no potential conflict of interests regarding the research, authorship, and / or publication of this article.
References
1. Abulkhanova-Slavskaya K. A. The strategy of life. Moscow: Mysl, 1991, 299. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/sgbtrn
2. Bozhovich L. I. Features of self-awareness in adolescents. Voprosy Psykhologii, 1995, (1): 98–107. (In Russ.)
3. Vorobiev A. N., Senin I. G., Chirkov V. I. Holland’s questionnaire of career preferences. Moscow: Kogito-Tsentr, 2001, 20. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/supnsz
4. Golovakha E. I. Life prospects and professional self-determination in young people. Kyiv: Nauk. dumka, 1988, 144. (In Russ.)
5. Dergacheva O. E., Dorfman L. Ya., Leontiev D. A. Russian adaptation of the general causality orientation scale. Lomonosov Psychology Journal, 2008, (3): 91–106. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/nbuxcz
6. Dukhnovsky S. V. Career preferences and professional and psychological types of students of higher education institutions. Izvestiya of Saratov University. Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy, 2020, 20(1): 69–75. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/fsrwrs
7. Dukhnovsky S. V. Psychological reliability and personnel security (the case of the state civil and municipal service). Kurgan: Kurgan branch of RANEPA, 2018, 314. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/ysvkqx
8. Klimov E. A. Psychology of professional self-determination. Moscow: Academia, 2004, 304. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/qxienf
9. Klochko V. E. The complexity levels of psychological thinking and modern cognitive science. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filosofiya. Sotsiologiya. Politologiya, 2012, (4-1): 37–43. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/pvalkr
10. Klochko V. E., Galazhinsky E. V. Innovative potential of a personality: System anthropological context. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2009, (325): 146–151. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/lhqtzl
11. Klochko V. E., Klochko Yu. V. A person: An open system in a closed environment. Sibirskiy Psikhologicheskiy Zhurnal, 2015, (57): 6–16. (In Russ.)
12. Kornilova T. V. Diagnostics of personal decision-making factors. Voprosy Psikhologii, 1994, (6): 99–110. (In Russ.)
13. Kornilova T. V. Intellectual and personal potential of a person in conditions of uncertainty and risk. St. Petersburg: Nestor-Istoriia, 2016, 344. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/xpvycl
14. Kornilova T. V. Melbourne Decision Making questionnaire: A Russian adaptation. Psychological Studies, 2013, 6(31). (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.54359/ps.v6i31.671
15. Kornilova T. V. Methodological problems of decision making psychology. Psikhologicheskii Zhurnal, 2005, 26(1): 7–17. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/hrvrit
16. Kornilova T. V. General decision-making styles: Testing the Russian-language modification of the GDMS questionnaire. Lomonosov Psychology Journal, 2024, 47(3): 123–149. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.11621/LPJ-24-32
17. Kravchenko A. I. Profession choice: Conceptual frames and empirical trends. Sotsiologiia, 2020, (4): 22–51. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/noqsxx
18. Krasnoryadtseva O. M. Educational experience of reflection developing in the personal competencies structure of students studying management. Sibirskiy Psikhologicheskiy Zhurnal, 2015, (58): 45–60. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17223/17267080/58/3
19. Krasnoryadtseva O. M., Teterina E. S., Bredun E. V., Podoynitsina M. A. Cognitive choice as a predictor of decision making. Sibirskiy Psikhologicheskiy Zhurnal, 2024, (94): 139–155. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17223/17267080/94/8
20. Kuznetsov I. Yu. Professional act. Proceedings of the Department of Psychology, Northern International University. Magadan: Kordis, 2001, iss. 1, 77–87. (In Russ.)
21. Leontiev D. A., Ovchinnikova E. Yu., Rasskazova E. I., Fam A. Kh. Psychology of choice. Moscow: Smysl, 2015, 1984. (In Russ.)
22. Leontiev D. A., Pham A. Kh. How we choose: The structures of subjective experience of one’s choice and their connections with personality variables. Lomonosov Psychology Journal, 2011, (1): 39–53. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/nxnpjl
23. Leontiev D. A., Shelobanova E. V. Vocational choice as anticipation of images of possible future. Voprosy Psykhologii, 2001, (1): 57–65. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/mwhtbx
24. Mironenkova N. N. The problem of value-semantic choice in modern psychological-pedagogical researches. Azimuth of Scientific Research: Pedagogy and Psychology, 2019, 8(2): 158–161. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26140/anip-2019-0802-0034
25. Noskova N. V. Problem of choice and man’s age-related development psychology. Bulletin of PSTGU. Ser. IV: Pedagogika. Psikhologiia, 2008, (3): 59–70. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/jxkmvt
26. Popov E. A. The profession of a psychologist: The ideals of applicants and the validity of the choice of students. Sociodynamics, 2022, (11): 28–43. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25136/2409-7144.2022.11.39158
27. Pryazhnikov N. S. Methods of activating professional and personal self-identification. Moscow: MPSI; Voronezh: MODEK, 2002, 400. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/wlonnv
28. Razvaliaeva A. Yu. Approbation of the decision making tendency inventory in the Russian sample. Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy, 2018, 26(3): 146–163. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17759/cpp.2018260308
29. Safin V. F., Nikov G. P. Psychological aspect of self-identification. Psikhologicheskii Zhurnal, 1984, 5(4): 65–73. (In Russ.)
30. Stefanenko N. A. Existential choice of the teenager as the pedagogic problem. Vestnik KGU im. N. A. Nekrasova. Seriia: Pedagogika. Psikhologiia. Sotsialnaia rabota. Iuvenologiia. Sotsiokinetika, 2010, 16(3): 15–19. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/ntucih
31. Suntsova Ya. S., Meshkov I. Yu. The phenomena of choice and decision-making in psychological science. Bulletin of Udmurt University. Series Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy, 2022, 32(4): 395–404. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.35634/2412-9550-2022-32-4-395-404
32. Turnova Yu. I., Nikolaeva N. N., Ilyina S. A., Pichugina M. V. The problem of choice in modern conditions. Kazan Pedagogical Journal, 2022, (4): 236–243. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/pfhukp
33. Fam A. Kh., Leontiev D. A. Subjective construction of choice in situations of different scale of importance (Part 1). Lomonosov Psychology Journal, 2013a, (1): 84–96. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/pxstwh
34. Fam A. Kh., Leontiev D. A. Subjective construction of choice in situations of different scale of importance (the end). Lomonosov Psychology Journal, 2013b, (2): 93–105. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/qctpwz
35. Chugunov K. V., Nikolaeva A. B., Yudina S. V. Professional choice of a student: Guidelines, expectations and factors in making the decision to enter a university. Tomsk State University Journal of Economics, 2024, (65): 61–81. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17223/19988648/65/5
36. Sharonin Yu. V. Psychological foundations of career choice in the lifetime. Vestnik RMAT, 2022, (1): 42–47. (In Russ.)
37. Yasin M. I., Khukhlaev O. E. Russian-language adaptation of the questionnaire D. Webster and A. Kruglyanski "The need for cognitive closure". Psychology, Journal of the Higher School of Economics, 2023, 20(2): 282–299. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17323/1813-8918-2023-2-282-299
38. Anghel E., Gati I. The associations between career decision-making difficulties and negative emotional states. Journal of Career Development, 2021, 48(4): 537–551. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894845319884119
39. Fris D. A. H., van Vianen A. E. M., Koen J., de Hoog M., de Pagter A. P. J. Medical students’ career decision-making stress during clinical clerkships. Perspectives on Medical Education, 2022, 11(6): 350–358. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-022-00734-8
40. Lent R. W., Brown S. D. Career decision making, fast and slow: Toward an integrative model of intervention for sustainable career choice. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 2020, 120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2020.103448
41. Yusran N. A., Puad M. H. M., Omar M. K. Role of career exploration in influencing career choice among pre-university student. Pertanika Journal of Social Science and Humanities, 2021, 29(S1). https://doi.org/10.47836/pjssh.29.s1.05.
Review
For citations:
Krasnoryadtseva O.M., Teterina E.S. Career Choice Issues in First-Year Students: Cognitive Profile. SibScript. 2025;27(5):947-956. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21603/sibscript-2025-27-5-947-956
































