Preview

SibScript

Advanced search

Keir Starmer’s Labor Government: Resetting the UK’s Relations with the European Union

https://doi.org/10.21603/sibscript-2025-27-3-531-540

EDN: PMXOTE

Abstract

After a 14-year gap, the UK’s Labor government needs to re-establish its post-Brexit ties with the European Union. The author seeks to interpret the early steps made by Prime Minister Keir Starmer in this direction, as well as to understand the internal and external factors that affect the current British foreign policy. To improve its relations with Brussels, the British government intends to reset them, which implies close cooperation in some areas. The article outlines the priority tasks, red lines, and unresolved issues for each side. Relying on the principles of historicism and objectivism, the author used the comparative-historical and problem-chronological methods to explain particular events, actions, meetings, and agreements as part of the reset. The Global Britain strategy depends on global political processes, with a number of objective and subjective factors contributing to the rapprochement of the two sides. For the United Kingdom, the reset of its relations with the European Union is currently more important than improving its special relationship with the United States. 

About the Author

Tatyana N. Cherkashina
Dostoevsky Omsk State University
Russian Federation

Omsk



References

1. Aleshin A. A., Kislitsyn S. V. Brexit and the future of the special relationship between the United States and the United Kingdom. Lomonosov World Politics Journal, 2019, 11(1): 138–171. (In Russ.)] https://elibrary.ru/tlxzcg

2. Ananieva E. Britain – USA: What has gone wrong between close and revered allies? The International Affairs, 11 Dec 2024. (In Russ.)] URL: https://interaffairs.ru/news/show/49314 (accessed 13 Feb 2025).

3. Andreeva T. N. British-American "special relationship" at the Brexit beginning (July 2016 – the beginning of 2018). Britain: History, Culture, Education: Proc. Intern. Sci. Conf., Yaroslavl, 13–14 Sep 2018. Yaroslavl: YSPU, 2018, iss. 4, 26–34. (In Russ.)] https://elibrary.ru/ysrwjf

4. Babynina L. O. Trade and cooperation agreement between the EU and the UK: Conditionality versus sovereignty. Sovremennaya Evropa, 2021, (2): 5–16. (In Russ.)] http://dx.doi.org/10.15211/soveurope220210516

5. Bogdasarova T. Transformation of the concept of Global Britain after Brexit. Russian International Affairs Council, 21 May 2020. (In Russ.)] URL: https://russiancouncil.ru/analytics-and-comments/columns/europeanpolicy/transformatsiya-kontseptsii-globalnaya-britaniya-posle-brexit/ (accessed 22 Feb 2025).

6. Bolshakov А. V. The actual problems of the UK-US trade relationship. World and National Economy, 2021, (3). (In Russ.)] URL: https://mirec.mgimo.ru/2021/2021-03/actual-problems-uk-us-trade (accessed 21 Feb 2025). https://elibrary.ru/xswspy

7. Bushov A. S. Trumpism in US foreign policy. The origins, characteristics and prospects. Administrative Consulting, 2020, 6(2): 13–20. (In Russ.)] https://elibrary.ru/kpaaeh

8. Godovanyuk K. A. "Global Britain" in the run-up to Brexit. Moscow: IE RAS, 2020, 160. (In Russ.)] https://doi.org/10.15211/report62020_373

9. Godovanyuk K. A. US-UK "special relationship": Trump’s factor. Nauchno-analiticheskij vestnik IE RAN, 2018, (4): 142–149. (In Russ.)] http://dx.doi.org/10.15211/vestnikieran42018142149

10. Godovanyuk K. A. About the special relationshs between Great Britain and the United States in an era of change. Analytical papers of the Institute of Europe RAS, 2017, (76). (In Russ.)] URL: http://www.zapiski-ieran.ru/images/analitika/an76.pdf (accessed 8 Feb 2025).

11. Gromyko A. A., Aivazyan A. S., Alekseenkova E. S., Ananieva E. V., Babynina L. O., Belov V. B. et al. The stage of the special military operation in Ukraine. The anatomy of the anti-Russia policy in Europe. Moscow: IE RAS, 2022, 194. (In Russ.)] https://doi.org/10.15211/report42022_390

12. Kadomtsev A. Great Britain after Brexit: between the USA and the EU. The International Affairs, 5 Feb 2020. (In Russ.)] URL: https://interaffairs.ru/news/show/25271 (accessed 21 Feb 2025).

13. Kadomtsev A. Old friends or new rivals: How are relations between the European Union and Great Britain going to develop? The International Affairs, 11 Jan 2021. (In Russ.)] URL: https://interaffairs.ru/news/show/28689 (accessed 8 Feb 2025).

14. Korableva N. U. Trade and cooperation agreement between EU and UK: Practical implementation. Izvestiya Yugo-Zapadnogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Istoriya i pravo, 2023, 13(1): 43–52. (In Russ.)] https://elibrary.ru/xgpwsa

15. Mamedova A. O. The present and the future of the special relationship: The debate in the United States and the United Kingdom. Lomonosov World Politics Journal, 2018, 10(2): 33–60. (In Russ.)] https://elibrary.ru/ytyoff

16. Sokolova A. Brexit seven years later. Why does Brexit disappoint the British? Political and economic development of Great Britain after Brexit. Russian International Affairs Council, 20 Jul 2023. (In Russ.)] URL: https://russiancouncil.ru/blogs/a-sokolova/brexit-sem-let-spustya-pochemu-vykhod-iz-es-razocharoval-britantsev-po/ (accessed 13 Feb 2025).

17. Stepanova C. N. Post-Brexit UK. Economics, applied computer science, and humanities: Modern trends and development prospects: Proc. Intern. Sci.-Prac. Conf., Moscow, 14 Apr 2021. Moscow: AL&SR, 2021, 344–350. (In Russ.)] https://elibrary.ru/doefnu

18. Khakhalkina E. V. "Global Britain": From idea to implementation. Sovremennaya Evropa, 2021, (1): 21–32. (In Russ.)] http://dx.doi.org/10.15211/soveurope120212132

19. Khlopov O. A. Special relationship of the US and the UK under Trump аnd Biden. USA & Canada: Economics – Politics – Culture, 2022, (5): 20–33. (In Russ.)] https://doi.org/10.31857/S2686673022050029

20. Cherkashina T. N. The "special relationship" of the UK and the USA: The test of time. The Power of History – the History of Power, 2024a, 10(5): 47–57. (In Russ.)] https://elibrary.ru/einggb

21. Cherkashina T. N. The conceptual basis of British post-Brexit foreign policy: The idea of "Global Britain". Herald of Omsk University. Series "Historical Studies", 2022, 9(1): 160–165. (In Russ.)] https://elibrary.ru/cacnnv

22. Cherkashina T. N. Relations between the UK and the EU: From Brexit to the Reset. Graduate School: Scientific Research: Proc. Interuniv. Intern. Congress, Moscow, 26 Dec 2024. Moscow: Infinity, 2024b, vol. 2, 80–87. (In Russ.)] https://elibrary.ru/eeytwl

23. Cherniaev M. S. The UK-US special relationship through the lens of strategic documents. Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniia, 2024, (1): 113–124. (In Russ.)] https://doi.org/10.7256/2454-0641.2024.1.70210

24. Kane J., Rutter J., Pope T. What tariffs has Donald Trump announced – and what do they mean for the UK? Institute for Government, 7 Apr 2020. URL: https://www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/explainer/trade-tariffs (accessed 5 May 2025).

25. Pierce S. Immigration-related policy changes in the first two years of the Trump administration. Migration Policy Institute, 2019. URL: https://www.migrationpolicy.org/sites/default/files/publications/ImmigrationChangesTrumpAdministration-FinalWEB.pdf (accessed 23 Feb 2025).

26. Riddervold M., Newsome A. Transatlantic relations in times of uncertainty: Crises and EU-US relations. Journal of European Integration, 2018, 40(5): 505–521. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2018.1488839

27. Rutter J. Five years since Brexit: The future of the EU-UK relations still haunt the government. Institute for Government, 31 Jan 2025. URL: https://www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/comment/five-years-brexit (accessed 5 Feb 2025).

28. Rutter J. The government needs to develop a robust EU strategy. Institute for Government, 12 Dec 2024. URL: https://www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/comment/government-needs-eu-strategy (accessed 5 Feb 2025).


Review

For citations:


Cherkashina T.N. Keir Starmer’s Labor Government: Resetting the UK’s Relations with the European Union. SibScript. 2025;27(3):531-540. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21603/sibscript-2025-27-3-531-540. EDN: PMXOTE

Views: 7


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2949-2122 (Print)
ISSN 2949-2092 (Online)