Characteristics of the Defendant and the Victim in Forensic Rhetoric

Defendants’ and victims’ characteristic has always been an important part of forensic rhetoric in a jury trial. This research featured speeches by such famous Russian lawyers and prosecutors of the XIX century as F. N. Plevako, N. V. Muravyov, P. A. Aleksandrov, and A. F. Koni, who described the criminal and the victim in their speeches to offer the jury a general insight into the case and allow them to develop a legal and moral profile of the defendant and the complainant. The study introduces a theoretical and practical understanding of the rhetorical significance of this element of forensic speech as part of persuasion technique in a jury trial. The results obtained can be used as recommendations for practicing lawyers. The following axiological and semantic provisions can optimize the compilation of modern court speeches. 1. Negative description of the victim can make the jury distrust the victim’s statement, which is a positive factor for the defense. 2. If the lawyer manages to evoke compassion and pity for the victim, it may reduce the defendant's chances for an acquittal or mitigation. 3. Stories from the defendant’s childhood that reveal their character development give the speaker the opportunity to change the jury’s attitude. 4. A portrait given by individual qualities also makes it possible to form a necessary attitude to the personality of the defendant.

1. Baisheva Z. V. Characteristics of the defendant's personality in courtroom speech (rhetorical aspect). Mezhdunarodnyy nauchno-issledovatelskiy zhurnal, 2021, (10-3): 92–96. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.23670/IRJ.2021.112.10.084

2. Baynov A. M. Personality psychology. Skif. Voprosy studencheskoi nauki, 2018, (11): 169–171. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/yyhuhj

3. Bushnaya N. V. Jury trial in Russia: history and modernity. Stavropol: SB MPSU, 2016, 144. (In Russ.)

4. Vasilyev V. L. Juridical psychology. 6th ed. St. Petersburg: Piter, 2009, 608. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/qxvncj

5. Volkov V. V. The influence of socio-economic status of defendants on court decisions. Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsialnoy antropologii, 2014, (4): 63–85. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/tdosaf

6. Gavrilenko A. A. Problems of study of the personality of the defendant in a jury trial. Tomsk State University Journal, 2011, (345): 104–107. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/nsieth

7. Guskova A. P. The problem of the effectiveness of justice. Vestnik Omskogo universiteta. Seriya "Pravo", 2008, (1): 38–41. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/mnicpj

8. Demichev A. A. Periodization of the history of jury trials in Russia. Journal of Russian Law, 2001, (7): 137–150. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/vmyzur

9. Demichev A. A. Prospects for a Russian jury trial. Gosudarstvo i Pravo, 2002, (11): 101–104. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/vmyzxt

10. Dudko N. A. Phased introduction of jury trial in Russia. Barnaul: ASU, 2013, 225. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/sdczin

11. Zagvozdkin N. N. Identification of the accused: criminal procedure, forensic and other aspects. Pravo i politika, 2016, (2): 262–271. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.7256/1811-9018.2016.2.17818

12. Zolotykh V. V. Investi­gation of the identity of the defendant. Russian Justice, 1996, (8). (In Russ.)

13. Ivakina N. N. Fundamentals of judicial eloquence: rhetoric for lawyers. Moscow: Iurist, 2007, 464. (In Russ.)

14. Katyshev P. A. Orthological modeling of modern judicial speech. Legal Linguistics, 2007, (8): 123–130. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/wkgxvh

15. Kislenko S. L. Research of the data characterizing the defendant's personality: problematic aspects of theory and law enforcement practice. Criminalistics: yesterday, today, tomorrow, 2021, (1): 77–93. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24412/2587-9820-2021-1-77-93

16. Lazareva V. A. Court speech in a criminal case. Samara: Samara University, 2018, 336. (In Russ.)

17. Lokhanskii S. S. Criminal law characterization of the characteristics of the concept of personality. Law: Current Trends: Proc. Intern. Sci. Conf., Ufa, 20–23 Jul 2012. Ufa: Leto, 2012, 124–130. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/vqcecj

18. Liakhov Iu. A., Zolotykh V. V. Jury as a way to fair justice. Russian Justice, 1997, (3): 9–10. (In Russ.)

19. Muravyov S. I. The art of persuasion: some peculiarities with implementation of adversarial principle in administering justice by the jury trial. Voprosy rossiiskoi iustitsii, 2020, (5): 486–496. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/yuqgik

20. Nasonov S. A. When the defense should choose a jury trial. Ugolovnyi protsess, 2020, (3): 22–29. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/yumrwk

21. Nasonov S. A. Conceptual foundations for reforming the jury trial in Russia. Sudya, 2016, (5): 26–28. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/zhjuzn

22. Osipova E. V., Preibis I. I. Judicial tactics of investigating information about defendant in court. News of the Tula State University. Economic and Legal Sciences, 2018, (2-2): 88–95. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/xzokgt

23. Porokhovshchikov P. S. The art of speech at trial. Moscow: Iurid. lit., 1988, 384. (In Russ.)

24. Prigarina N. K. Communicative rhetorical strategy of creating an emotional atmosphere of sympathy for the defendant in the defense lawyer's speech during the trial. Izv. Volgogr. gos. ped. un-ta, 2019, (4): 164–167. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/hlsprj

25. Ryabova L. G. The speech of the public prosecutor of the jury: structural and rhetorical features. Evraziiskii iuridicheskii zhurnal, 2018, (12): 436–440. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/vsdaej

26. Khorkova I. V. Methods of antique judicial rhetoric in practice of jury. Vestnik of Moscow State Linguistic University. Humanities, 2016, (2): 231–241. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/ynhkiy

27. Chesnykh V. I. Revival and organization of jury trial in Russia: historical and constitutional legal aspects. Moscow, 2000, 337. (In Russ.)

28. Shkarlet N. A. Theory and practice of the court's consideration of the defendant's identity in probation. Rossiiskoe pravosudie, 2019, (10): 101–105. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17238/issn2072-909X.2019.10.101-105