Preview

SibScript

Advanced search

Secondary Functions of Tenses in Italian Comedies of the XVI Century

https://doi.org/10.21603/sibscript-2023-25-4-500-508

Abstract

At its present stage, the Italian language of informal communication seems to demonstrate a lot of innovations. For example, the colloquial use of verb tenses is limited to Presente Indicativo, Passato Prossimo or Passato Remoto, Imperfetto, and Trapassato Prossimo. The obvious simplification of the verb system eventually expands the functions of each tense. However, a diachronic analysis may prove that this process is not as innovative as it seems. This research featured Italian comedies of the XVI century, which saw the emergence of a unified state language. The comedies provide a valuable research material: in pursuit of comic effect, their texts often imitated the contemporary colloquial speech. As a result, they yield a lot of valuable examples of everyday communication of previous centuries. Characters that portrayed lower-class people often used tenses in their secondary functions, e.g., they replaced the subjunctive with the indicative, used the present to indicate the near future, formulated polite requests with the help of the imperfect, the functions of the future tense were narrowed down to an epistemic modality, etc. Therefore, the modern Italian language is not developing new constructions: it is undergoing a re-standardization, where colloquial phenomena are gradually becoming a norm. The prescriptive norm is being replaced by a descriptive one, which reflects the actual speech of native speakers.

About the Author

Daria A. Kuteko
Moscow State Lomonosov University
Russian Federation

Moscow 


Competing Interests:

The author declared no potential conflict of interests regarding the research, authorship, and / or publication of this article.



References

1. Zholudeva L. I. The concept of Italiano Neostandard. Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2020, 22(2): 499–506. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2020-22-2-499-506

2. Zholudeva L. I. Impersonal and passive si-constructions in the Italian language od XVI century. Vestnik Udmurtskogo universiteta. Seriya Istoriya i filologiya, 2018a, 3(5): 794–801. (In Russ.) https://www.elibrary.ru/ymjygd

3. Zholudeva L. I. Language standardization issues in early Italian and Portuguese linguistic treatises: territorial and functional bases of language norm. Uchenye zapiski Orlovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriia: Gumanitarnye i sotsialnye nauki, 2014, (1): 231–238. (In Russ.) https://www.elibrary.ru/styvij

4. Zholudeva L. I. Speech characteristics of servants in Italian comedies of the 16th century: on parameters of language variability. Nauchnyi dialog, 2018b, (11): 37–49. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2018-11-37-49

5. Marchenko E. G. Spontaneous spoken language imitation in the comedies by 16-century Siena-born authors. Stephanos, 2019, (4): 197–203. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24249/2309-9917-2019-36-4-197-203

6. Antonelli G. L’italiano nella società della comunicazione. Bologna: Il Mulino, 2007, 206.

7. Berruto G. Sociolinguistica dell’italiano contemporaneo. 2nd ed. Roma: Carocci, 2014, 278.

8. Berruto G. What is changing in Italian today? Phenomena of restandardization in syntax and morphology: an overview. Towards a new standard: Theoretical and empirical studies on the restandardization of Italian, eds. Cerruti M., Crocco C., Marzo S. Berlin-Boston: De Gruyter, 2017, 31–60. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614518839-002

9. Cerruti M., Crocco C., Marzo S. On the development of a new standard norm in Italian. Towards a new standard: Theoretical and empirical studies on the restandardization of Italian, eds. Cerruti M., Crocco C., Marzo S. Berlin-Boston: De Gruyter, 2017, 3–30. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614518839-001

10. Crocco C. Everyone has an accent. Standard Italian and regional pronounciation. Towards a new standard: Theoretical and empirical studies on the restandardization of Italian, eds. Cerruti M., Crocco C., Marzo S. Berlin-Boston: De Gruyter, 2017, 89–117. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614518839-004

11. D’Achille P. L’italiano contemporaneo. Bologna: Il Mulino, 2010, 288.

12. D’Onghia L. Da quanto tempo gli italiani parlano italiano? Riflessioni sparse sulla questione dell’italofonia preunitaria. Trasversalità delle lingue e dell’analisi linguistica, eds. Fiorentino G., Ricci C., Siekiera A. Firenze: Cesati, 2018, 35–48.

13. D’Onghia L. Drammaturgia. Storia dell’italiano scritto. II. Prosa letteraria, eds. Antonelli G., Motolese M., Tomasin L. Roma: Carocci editore, 2014, 153–202.

14. De Blasi N. Geografia e storia dell’italiano regionale. Bologna: Il Mulino, 2014, 247.

15. De Pascale S., Marzo S., Speelman D. Evaluating regional variation in Italian: towards a change in standard language ideology? Towards a new standard: Theoretical and empirical studies on the restandardization of Italian, eds. Cerruti M., Crocco C., Marzo S. Berlin-Boston: De Gruyter, 2017, 118–142. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614518839-005

16. Hernández-Campoy J. M., Schilling N. The application of the quantitative paradigm to historical sociolinguistics: Problems with the generalizability principle. The handbook of historical sociolinguistics, eds. Hernández-Campoy J. M., Conde-Silvestre J. C. Chichester-Malden: Wiley-Blackwell, 2014, 63–79.

17. Migliorini B. La questione della lingua. Questioni e correnti di Storia letteraria. Milano: Calo Marzorati, 1949, 1–72.

18. Migliorini B. Storia della lingua italiana. Firenze: Sansoni, 1960, 841.

19. Mioni A. M. Italiano tendenziale: osservazioni su alcuni aspetti della standardizzazione. Scritti linguistici in onore di Giovan Battista Pellegrini, eds. Benincà P. et. al. Pisa: Pacini, 1983, vol. 2, 495–517.

20. Nencioni G. Autodiacronia linguistica: un caso personale. Firenze: Olschki, 1983, 25.

21. Nencioni G. Fra grammatica e retorica. Firenze: Leo Olschki Editore, 1955, 184.

22. Patota G. I percorsi grammaticali. Storia della lingua italiana. Vol. I. I luoghi della codificazione, eds. Serianni L., Trifone P. Torino: Einaudi, 1993, 93–137.

23. Sabatini F. L’italiano dell’uso medio: una realtà tra le varietà linguistiche italiane. Gesprochenes italienisch in Gescichte und Gegenwart, eds. Holtus G., Radtke E. Tübingen: Narr, 1985, 154–184.

24. Serianni L., Bottai B., Azeglio Ciampi C. La lingua nella storia d’Italia. Roma-Milano: Società Dante Alighieri; Libri Scheiwiller, 2002, 787.

25. Trovato P. Storia della lingua italiana: il primo Cinquecento. Bologna: Mulino, 1994, 476.


Review

For citations:


Kuteko D.A. Secondary Functions of Tenses in Italian Comedies of the XVI Century. SibScript. 2023;25(4):500–508. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21603/sibscript-2023-25-4-500-508

Views: 193


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2949-2122 (Print)
ISSN 2949-2092 (Online)