Interethnic Trust Issues in a Multicultural Society
https://doi.org/10.21603/sibscript-2023-25-2-240-246
Abstract
The article describes the problem of trust in interethnic relations. The phenomenon of trust is one of the most important aspects of interethnic interaction in the modern multicultural environment. The trust of ethnophors to ethnocontact groups usually depend on the attitude of trust / distrust towards the world, other people, and oneself, as well as on the type of ethnic identity and personal characteristics. The study involved 280 young people from the North-Caucasian regions of Russia: 80 Ossetians, 80 Chechens, 40 Kabardians, 40 Russians, and 40 Georgians. The data collection relied on the Saks-Levy method of Incomplete Sentences, which was modified by the authors, the Assessment of Trust / Distrust to the World, Others, and Oneself developed by A. B. Kupreychenko, and R. B. Kettell’s 16-Factor Personality Questionnaire. The authors designed their own scale to measure the level of trust in ethno-contact groups. Other research tools included the method developed by N. M. Lebedeva and A. N. Tatarko that assesses the valence and definiteness of ethnic identity, the degree of civic identity, and interethnic attitudes. The respondents, regardless of nationality, believed that trusting interethnic relations are based on accepting foreign national values, customs, and culture, as well as on the certainty that a representative of a different ethnicity will provide help and support in a difficult situation. Those with a low level of interethnic trust demonstrated a much lower all-Russian identity and a much greater anxiety connected with interethnic interaction, compared with the respondents who had a high level of interethnic trust. The latter also had a positive attitude towards other ethnic groups and were ready to interact with other nationalities in various social situations. The respondents with low trust levels were less emotionally stable, more restrained, suspicious, anxious, conservative, and tense.
About the Authors
Alyona V. AlborovaRussian Federation
Vladikavkaz
Competing Interests:
The author declared no potential conflicts of interests regarding the research, authorship, and / or publication of this article
Svetlana V. Dreeva
Russian Federation
Vladikavkaz
Competing Interests:
The author declared no potential conflicts of interests regarding the research, authorship, and / or publication of this article
Victoria A. Starchenko
Russian Federation
Grozny
Competing Interests:
The author declared no potential conflicts of interests regarding the research, authorship, and / or publication of this article
References
1. Aleshin S. V. Trust as a socio-cultural phenomenon. Rostov-on-Don; Taganrog: SFedU, 2017, 101. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/yllcgs
2. Gurieva S. D. Interethnic relations: harmony, tension, and conflict. Social psychology: history and modernity, eds. Gurieva S. D., Pochebut L. G. Moscow: INFRA-M, 2021, 240–250. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/ntihul
3. Gurieva S. D., Borisova M. M. Formation and management of trust in the organization. In: Berezovskaya R. A., Borisova M. M., Vereshchagina L. A., Vodopyanova N. E., Gurieva S. D., Kapustina A. N. et al. Positive psychology of management. Moscow: Prospekt, 2017a, 89–107. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/znbzjv
4. Gurieva S. D., Borisova M. M. The formation of social representations of trust in adolescence. Modern Studies of Social Issues, 2017b, 8(2-1): 20–39. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.12731/2218-7405-2017-2-20-39
5. Eremicheva G., Simpura Yu. Distrust as a social problem in Russia society. Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsialnoy antropologii, 1999, 2(4): 145–159. (In Russ.) https://www.elibrary.ru/oncfol
6. Ilyin E. P. Psychology of trust. St. Petersburg: Piter, 2013, 288. (In Russ.) https://www.elibrary.ru/sdrksd
7. Kupreychenko A. B. Trust and mistrust – common and specific psychological characteristics. RUDN Journal of Psychology and Pedagogics, 2008a, (2): 46–53. (In Russ.) https://www.elibrary.ru/iufwjf
8. Kupreychenko A. B. Psychology of trust and distrust. Moscow: IP RAS, 2008b, 571. (In Russ.) https://www.elibrary.ru/qctdhr
9. Lebedeva N. M. Ethnic identity and psychological well-being of Russians in post-Soviet space: the role of diaspora. Cultural-Historical Psychology, 2021, 17(4): 16–24. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17759/chp.2021170402
10. Lebedeva N. M., Tatarko A. N. Social-psychological factors of ethnic tolerance and the strategies of intergroup interaction in multicultural regions of Russia. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal, 2003, 24(5): 31–44. (In Russ.) https://www.elibrary.ru/ooybsd
11. Pochebut L. G., Beznosov D. S. Assertiveness and tolerance in cross-cultural interaction. Social Psychology and Society, 2017, 8(3): 8–19. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17759/sps.2017080302
12. Pochebut L. G., Gurieva S. D., Chiker V. A. Predictive model of socio-psychological factors of building confidence in the organization. Social Psychology and Society, 2018a, 9(1): 22–42. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17759/sps.2018090103
13. Pochebut L. G. Chiker V. A., Volkova N. V. Conceptual framework of cognitive social capital in organizations from a social psychology perspective. Organizatsionnaya Psikhologiya, 2018b, 8(2): 47–71. (In Russ.) https://www.elibrary.ru/xvajkp
14. Sigitova V. S. Basic approaches to the study of trust in psychology. Sovremennye nauchnye issledovaniia i innovatsii, 2017, (4): 778–782. (In Russ.) https://www.elibrary.ru/ypjhqn
15. Skripkina T. P. Settings of tolerance, trust and xenophobia in youths living in the Yuzhnorossiysky region of Russia. Social Psychology and Society, 2010, 1(1): 136–151. (In Russ.) https://www.elibrary.ru/oirfrx
16. Skripkina T. P., Krishchenko E. P. Trust as a factor in the development of subjectivity in ontogenesis. Rostov-on-Don: SFedU, 2010, 328. (In Russ.) https://www.elibrary.ru/qydobb
17. Tatarko A. N. Social capital as a subject of psychological studies. Moscow: MAKS Press, 2011, 176. (In Russ.) https://www.elibrary.ru/qycyip
18. Tatarko A. N. Researches on social capital in multicultural society: theoretical and methodological problems and key results. Social Psychology and Society, 2021, 12(4): 34–52. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17759/sps.2021120403
19. Tatarko A. N., Lepshokova Z. Kh., Dubrov D. I. Trust as a moderator of attitude towards ethnic diversity and acculturation expectations of the host population. Social Psychology and Society, 2019, 10(1): 92–114. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17759/sps.2019100106
20. Fukuyama F. Trust: the social virtues and the creation of prosperity. Moscow: AST; Ermak, 2004, 730. (In Russ.) https://www.elibrary.ru/qoctsf
21. Erikson E. H. Young man Luther. A study in psychoanalysis and history. Moscow: Medium, 1996, 506. (In Russ.)
22. Yakusheva M. V. Nonverbal presentation of trust and distrust in interpersonal communication. Rostov-on-Don: RSTU, 2011, 149. (In Russ.) https://www.elibrary.ru/qydrvd
23. Derluguian G. M. Bourdieu's secret admirer in the Caucasus: a world-system biography. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2005, 406.
24. Eisenstadt S. N., Roniger L. Patrons, clients and friends: interpersonal relations and the structure of trust in society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984, 343. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511557743
25. Hardin R. The street-level epistemology of trust. Analyse & Kritik, 1992, 14(2): 152–176. https://doi.org/10.1515/auk-1992-0204
26. Sato K. Trust and group size in a social dilemma. Japanese Psychological Research, 1988, 30(2): 88–93. https://doi.org/10.4992/psycholres1954.30.88
27. Shapiro S. P. The social control of impersonal trust. American Journal of Sociology, 1987, 93(3): 623–658. https://doi.org/10.1086/228791
Review
For citations:
Alborova A.V., Dreeva S.V., Starchenko V.A. Interethnic Trust Issues in a Multicultural Society. SibScript. 2023;25(2):240-246. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21603/sibscript-2023-25-2-240-246