Preview

SibScript

Advanced search

Teachers and Expression of Emotions in Digital Communication

https://doi.org/10.21603/sibscript-2023-25-2-218-227

Abstract

This article introduces an empirical study of the way teachers express emotions during digital communication, both in typing and in video conferencing. The study involved 170 female and 20 male members of school and university teaching staff (mean age = 43.78 y.o). It relied on an authentic multiple-choice questionnaire, grid questions, and case tasks. The participants knew special online means of expressing emotions but seldom used them with students. At video conferences, they referred to the same methods of transmitting emotions as in real communication. The women and the school teachers were more emotional in the digital environment than the rest. The research revealed emotionally limited digital communication between teachers and students, which needs further research on how to develop the lacking competencies.

About the Authors

Svetlana A. Miniurova
Ural State Pedagogical University
Russian Federation

Ekaterinburg

Scopus Author ID: 57194576924


Competing Interests:

The author declared no potential conflicts of interests regarding the research, authorship, and / or publication of this article



Victor S. Basyuk
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation

Moscow

Scopus Author ID: 57223930560


Competing Interests:

The author declared no potential conflicts of interests regarding the research, authorship, and / or publication of this article



Elena Yu. Brel
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation

Moscow

Scopus Author ID: 57452782300 


Competing Interests:

The author declared no potential conflicts of interests regarding the research, authorship, and / or publication of this article



Irina V. Vorobyova
Ural State Pedagogical University
Russian Federation

Ekaterinburg

Scopus Author ID: 56662082000


Competing Interests:

The author declared no potential conflicts of interests regarding the research, authorship, and / or publication of this article



Olga V. Kruzhkova
Ural State Pedagogical University
Russian Federation

Ekaterinburg

Scopus Author ID: 56662123100


Competing Interests:

The author declared no potential conflicts of interests regarding the research, authorship, and / or publication of this article



References

1. Baronova E. V., Volgina O. V. Using memes in higher school foreign language teaching. Variability and standardization of language education in a non-linguistic university: Proc. II Intern. Sci.-Prac. Conf., Nizhny Novgorod, 23–24 Apr 2019. Nizhny Novgorod: UNN, 2019, 37–41. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/gkofqd

2. Bezborodova L. A., Bezborodova M. A. Emotional intelligence as an important factor of communicative interaction between a teacher and students. Nauka i shkola, 2018, (3): 52–57. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/xswbtf

3. Brel E. Yu. Development of the emotional sphere of senior preschoolers in conditions of pedagogical support. Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriia: Gumanitarnye i obshchestvennye nauki, 2020, 4(2): 95–106. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21603/2542-1840-2020-4-2-95-106

4. Bruns T. Punctuation marks and smileys: unifying and separating functions in digital communication. Jezyk i metoda: jezyk rosyjski w badaniach lingwistycznych XXI wieku, eds. Szumska D., Ozga K. V. Kraków: Uniwersytet Jagielloński, 2021, vol. 7, 187–198. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.4467/23919981JM.21.018.14250

5. Dmitrieva E. S., GelmanV. Ya. Perception of auditory and visual emotional information in primary school age children and its impact on their academic progress. Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie, 2018, 23(5): 29–39. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17759/pse.2018230504

6. Emelin V. A., Rasskazova E. I., Tkhostov A. Sh. The psychological affects of information technology. Natsional'nyy psikhologicheskiy zhurnal, 2012, (1): 81–87. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/oppfwx

7. Zeer E. F., Tserkovnikova N. G., Tretyakova V. S. Digital generation in the context of predicting the professional future. The Education and Science Journal, 2021, 23(6): 153–184. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2021-6-153-184

8. Koltsova E. A., Kartashkova F. I. Digital communication and multimodal features: functioning of emoji in interpersonal communication. RUDN Journal of Language Studies, Semiotics and Semantics, 2022, 13(3): 769–783. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2299-2022-13-3-769-783

9. Kruzhkova O. V. Dispositions of the personality's protective and coping behaviour: theoretical construct and the empirical model. Yaroslavl pedagogical bulletin, 2012, 2(3): 222–227. (In Russ.) https://www.elibrary.ru/pytwlx

10. Kurasova O. V. Theoretical model of empathy mechanism in online communication. Psikhologiya. Istoriko-kriticheskie obzory i sovremennye issledovaniya, 2019, 8(1А): 200–210. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25799/AR.2019.43.1.068

11. Martynova E. N., Lyusin D. V. The Stroop emotional effect in students. Psy-Vyshka: Proc. Intern. Sci. Conf., Moscow, 31 Oct – 2 Nov 2019. Moscow: RNU, 2020, 90–92. (In Russ.)

12. Miniurova S. А., Basyuk V. S., Brel Е. Yu., Vorobyeva I. V., Kruzhkova О. V., Matveeva А. I. Emotional intelligence of subjects of the educational environment amidst digitalization: review of studies. Sibirskiy Psikhologicheskiy Zhurnal, 2021, (82): 153–173. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17223/17267080/82/9

13. Obukhova Yu. V., Borokhovski E. F. Emotional intelligence as a factor of successful self-realization in students of socionomic and bionomic professions. Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie, 2021, 26(2): 40–51. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17759/pse.2021260204

14. Panov V. I., Patrakov E. V. Digitalization of information environment: risks, representations, and interactions. Moscow: PI RAE; Kursk: Universitetskaia kniga, 2020, 199. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.47581/2020/02.Panov.001

15. Petrakova A. V., Kanonire T. N., Kulikova A. A., Orel E. A. Characteristics of teacher stress during distance learning imposed by the COVID-19 pandemic. Voprosy obrazovaniya, 2021, (1): 93–114. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17323/1814-9545-2021-1-93-114

16. Charoenpit S., Ohkura M. Exploring emotion in an e-learning system using eye tracking. International Journal of Affective Engineering, 2015, 14(4): 309–316. https://doi.org/10.5057/ijae.IJAE-D-14-29

17. Hsiao K.-A., Hsieh P.-L. Age difference in recognition of emoticons. International Conference on Human Interface and the Management of Information: Proc. 16th Intern. Conf. on Human-Computer Interaction (HCI International 2014), Heraklion, 22–27 Jun 2014. Cham: Springer, 2014, pt. II. Information and Knowledge in Applications and Services, 394–403. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07863-2_38

18. Kavanagh B. A cross-cultural analysis of Japanese and English non-verbal online communication: the use of emoticons in weblogs. Intercultural Communication Studies, 2010, 19(3): 65–80.

19. Leclerc C. M., Kensinger E. A. Effects of age on detection of emotional information. Psychology and Aging, 2008, 23(1): 209–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.23.1.209

20. Li L., Yang Y. Pragmatic functions of emoji in internet-based communication a corpus-based study. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 2018, 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-018-0057-z

21. Lo S.-K. The nonverbal communication functions of emoticons in computer-mediated communication. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 2008, 11(5): 595–597. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2007.0132

22. Prensky M. Digital natives, digital immigrants part 1. On the Horizon, 2001, 9(5): 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1108/10748120110424816

23. Subramanian J., Sridharan V., Shu K., Liu H. Exploiting emojis for sarcasm detection. Social, Cultural, and Behavioral Modeling: Proc. 12th Intern. Conf. on Social Computing, Behavioral-Cultural Modeling and Prediction and Behavior Representation in Modeling and Simulation (SBP-BRiMS 2019), Washington, 9–12 Jul 2019. Cham: Springer, 2019, 70–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21741-9_8

24. Thompson D., Filik R. Sarcasm in written communication: emoticons are efficient markers of intention. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 2016, 21(2): 105–120. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12156

25. Walther J. B., D'Addario K. P. The impacts of emoticons on message interpretation in computer-mediated communication. Social Science Computer Review, 2001, 19(3): 324–347. https://doi.org/10.1177/089443930101900307

26. Zhao H., Sun B., Hu X., Zhu X. The study of emotional education based on virtual reality in E-Learning. 1st International Conference on Information Science and Engineering (ICISE2009), Nanjing, 26–28 Dec 2009. IEEE, 2009, 3540–3543. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICISE.2009.1291


Review

For citations:


Miniurova S.A., Basyuk V.S., Brel E.Yu., Vorobyova I.V., Kruzhkova O.V. Teachers and Expression of Emotions in Digital Communication. SibScript. 2023;25(2):218-227. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21603/sibscript-2023-25-2-218-227

Views: 288


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2949-2122 (Print)
ISSN 2949-2092 (Online)