Preview

SibScript

Advanced search

Controlled Future as a Factor of Human Behavior Intentionality

https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2022-24-6-793-801

Abstract

This theoretical and empirical study verifies the hypothesis that the desire to control one’s own future is a significant behavioral factor. A controlled future is a phenomenon at the intersection of internality and emotional response. The relationship between the level of internality and emotional response was analyzed at two levels. The first level featured stable personality traits. They were identified using standard personality questionnaires, namely the Standard Personality Traits Questionnaire modified by E. G. Ksenofontov and C. Izard’s Differential Emotions Scale adapted by A. V. Leonov and M. S. Kapitsa. The second level featured situational personal traits manifested in particular situations as a general state of emotional comfort or discomfort. The authors developed a questionnaire that included six types of situations, each of which had three response options. The first option presupposed a passive (external) position, i.e., waiting for help from others. The second option described an active (internal) position. The third option was intermediate (50/50). Each behavioral option required an assessment of emotional comfort. At the level of subjective-personal traits, the general level of personal internality determined the readiness for action and overcoming difficulties, often associated with negative emotional experiences. A lower readiness for action and transformation triggered stronger negative emotions. The level of situational behavior demonstrated a similar trend: a lower control over the situation was associated with a greater emotional discomfort. However, the relationship between control and emotional comfort was not linear. The level of emotional discomfort increased following the rise in the control level.

About the Authors

M. V. Repin

Russian Federation

Mikhail V. Repin, Practicing psychologist

Belovo 



D. N. Dolganov
Tyumen State University
Russian Federation

Dmitry N. Dolganov

Tyumen 



References

1. Goncharova S. Yu. John Searle and his philosophy. Philosophy and Culture, 2012, (12): 78–84. (In Russ.) EDN: PZPZDV

2. Goncharova S. Yu. Searle's biological naturalism as an alternative to materialism and dualism in solving a difficult problem. NB: Filosofskie issledovaniia, 2013, (1): 141–174. (In Russ.) EDN: RWBKEF

3. Goncharova S. Yu. Intentionality of consciousness as a biological property of the brain. Psychology and Psychotechnics, 2014, (3): 295–303. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.7256/2070-8955.2014.3.10612

4. Smirnova Ya. K. Mental model and ability to attend collective intentionality in preschool children. Personality in a changing world: health, adaptation, development, 7(2): 402–413. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.23888/humJ20192402-413

5. Neumann J. von, Morgenstern O. Theory of game and economic behavior. Moscow: Nauka, 1970, 707. (In Russ.)

6. Schoemaker P. Expected utility model: variations, approaches, outcomes, and limits. Thesis, 1994, (5): 29–80. (In Russ.)

7. Kahneman D., Slovic P., Tversky A. Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and bias. Kharkov: Gumanitarnyi Tsentr, 2005, 632. (In Russ.)

8. Kahneman D. Thinking , fast and slow. Moscow: AST, 2018, 653. (In Russ.)

9. Asmolov A. G., Shekhter E. D., Chernorizov A. M. From organism as a whole to personalized community: transformation of self-organization in sociobiology. Psychological Studies, 2016, 9(48). (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.54359/ps.v9i48.438

10. Asmolov A. G., Shekhter E. D., Chernorizov A. M. Preadaptation to uncertainty: unpredictable paths of evolution. Moscow: Akropol, 2018, 212. (In Russ.)

11. Asmolov A. G., Shekhter E. D., Chernorizov A. M. The paradox of the adaptation and preadaptation coexistence of in the historical and evolutionary process. Voprosy Psikhologii, 2021, 67(4): 3–20. (In Russ.) EDN: VQJMDP

12. Horney K. The neurotic personality of our time. Moscow: Progress, 1993, 478. (In Russ.) EDN: SZFXIZ

13. Horney K. Our inner conflicts: A constructive theory of neurosis. Moscow: Progress kniga, 2019, 240. (In Russ.)

14. Frankl V. Psychotherapy and existentialism. Selected papers on logotherapy. Moscow: IOI, 2015, 192. (In Russ.)

15. Frankl V. Logotherapy and existential analysis: articles and lectures. Moscow: Alpina non-fikshn, 2016, 344. (In Russ.)

16. Bryun E. A., Mikhailov M. A., Tsvetkov A. V. Norm and pathology of meaning formation. Moscow: ISK, 2017. 144. (In Russ.) EDN: XSGNOX

17. Tsvetkova L. S., Tsvetkov A. V. Neuropsychological counseling in the practice of an educational psychologist. 2nd ed. Moscow: Izdanie knig kom, 2021, 120. (In Russ.)

18. Shuvalov A. V. Anthropological aspects of health psycholog. National Psychological Journal, 2015, (4): 23–36. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.11621/npj.2015.0403

19. Shuvalov A. V. Spiritual security as a fundamental basis of psychological security of a person. MCU Journal of Pedagogy and Psychology, 2020, (1): 65–73. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25688/2076-9121.2020.51.1.05

20. Galimov E. M. The phenomenon of life: between equilibrium and nonlinearity, origins, and principles of evolution. 3rd ed. Moscow: URSS, 2008, 253. (In Russ.)

21. Ball G. A. An attempt to explicate the concept of motive. Psikhologicheskii Zhurnal, 2004, 25(4): 56–65. (In Russ.) EDN: OXHXFH

22. Yanovsky M. I. "Intentional" approach to the interpretation of phenomena in psychology. Teoreticheskaya i eksperimentalnaya psikhologiya, 2011, 4(4): 82–91. (In Russ.) EDN: OXZIDL

23. Yanitskiy M. S., Seryy A. V. The basic methodological approaches to the study of the personal value-semantic sphere. Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta kul'tury i iskusstv, 2012, (19-1): 82–97. (In Russ.) EDN: OXSMUH

24. Muzdybaev K. Psychology of responsibility. Leningrad: Nauka, 1983, 240. (In Russ.) EDN: ZBIFNJ

25. Mitina O. V. Structural equations for latent curve modeling. Experimental Psychology (Russia), 2008, 1(1): 131–148. (In Russ.) EDN: KYXPJX


Review

For citations:


Repin M.V., Dolganov D.N. Controlled Future as a Factor of Human Behavior Intentionality. The Bulletin of Kemerovo State University. 2022;24(6):793-801. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2022-24-6-793-801

Views: 239


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2949-2122 (Print)
ISSN 2949-2092 (Online)