Russia and the European Union in Post-Soviet Space: In Search of Cooperative Co-Existence (the Case of Armenia)
https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2022-24-3-405-412
Abstract
The article introduces the prospects of cooperative co-existence for Russia and the European Union in former Soviet republics within the current confrontation paradigm. It describes their foreign policies, strategies, and interests in the post-Soviet space. The author applied discourse and case-study analyses to the case of Armenia. The authentic idea of cooperative co-existence was projected on the relations between Russia and the European Union in post-Soviet countries. In Armenia, cooperative co-existence could be a win-win strategy, beneficial for all actors involved. The case of Armenia proved the possibility of a collaborative co-existence between Russia and the European Union in the post-Soviet space, the risk factors being the policies of small Caucasian states, the USA, China, and Turkey.
About the Author
R. G. ElamiryanArmenia
Ruben G. Elamiryan
Yerevan
Competing Interests:
The author declared no potential conflicts of interests regarding the research, authorship, and / or publication of this article.
References
1. Wesson R. G. The Russian dilemma: a political and geopolitical view. New Brunswick, N. J.: Rutgers University Press, 1974, vi+228.
2. Primakov E. M. Meetings at crossroads. Moscow: Tsentrpoligraf, 2016, 608. (In Russ.)
3. Yakunin V. I., Zelenev E. I., Zeleneva I. V. Russian school of geopolitics. Moscow: St. Petersburg University Publ., 2008, 364. (In Russ.)
4. Putin V. V. New integration project for Eurasia – the future, that occurs today. Eurasian Integration: Economics, Law, and Politics, 2011, (10): 10–14. (In Russ.)
5. Sushentsov A., Neklyudov N. The Caucasus in Russian foreign policy strategy. Caucasus Survey, 2020, 8(2): 127–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/23761199.2020.1759888
6. Zhiltsov S. S., Savicheva E. M. Regional security in the South Caucasus: the energy factor. Post-Soviet Issues, 2021, 8(3): 331–340. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24975/2313-8920-2021-8-3-331-340
7. Iskandarov K., Simons G., Gawliczek P. The South Caucasus: stage for a "New Great Game" between NATO and Russia? Connections QJ, 2019, 18(3-4): 7–34. https://doi.org/10.11610/Connections.rus.18.3-4.01
8. Trenin D. V. "Reissue" of the Russian Federation. Russia in Global Affairs, 2022, 20(2): 27–33. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31278/1810-6439-2022-20-2-27-33
9. Elamiryan R. Eastern Partnership countries on the cross-roads of the Eurasian Geopolitics: US, EU, Russia, and China. The Kozmetsky Center of Excellence, Nov 2019. URL: https://www.kozmetskycenter.org/briefing-november-2019 (accessed 15 Mar 2022).
10. Minasyan S. Multi-vectorism in the foreign policy of post-soviet Eurasian states. Demokratizatsiya, 2012, 20(3): 268–273.
11. Bolgova I. V. EU – Armenia relations: a model of "quiet" coordination? Journal of International Analytics, 2018, (2): 37–46. (In Russ.)
12. Post-soviet constitutions and challenges of regional integration: Adapting to European and Eurasian integration projects, eds. Petrov R., Van Elsuwege P. London: Routledge, 2017, 246. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315656847
13. Nalbandian E. A. Russia is our main trading partner and the main investor in the Armenian economy. International Affairs, 2015, (4): 19–29. (In Russ.)
14. Elamiryan R. Eastern Partnership countries on the crossroads of the Eurasian integration processes. Institute for Foreign Affairs and Trade, 2017. URL: http://kki.hu/assets/upload/think_visegrad_analysis_ruben_elamiryan_ifat_2017.pdf (accessed 15 Mar 2022).
Review
For citations:
Elamiryan R.G. Russia and the European Union in Post-Soviet Space: In Search of Cooperative Co-Existence (the Case of Armenia). The Bulletin of Kemerovo State University. 2022;24(3):405-412. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2022-24-3-405-412