Genesis of the Crisis Response Civil Component in the European Union: Parameters, Problems, and Interaction with Russia
https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2022-24-3-359-367
Abstract
The article features the civil component of the crisis response in the European Union, as well as the Russian role in its development. With the new security threats and challenges, the civilian instruments necessary for the post-conflict society stabilization are becoming increasingly important. The research was based on the universal evolutionism and included such methods as conceptual and structural modeling, comparative analysis, and historical approach. The methods made it possible to reveal the civil component within the crisis management system of the European Union. The civil component unites and coordinates European national resources, creates platforms and opportunities for experience exchange, increases the motivation and professionalism of experts, etc. The author also focused on the interaction between the European Union and the Russian Federation in this sphere. The key parameters for developing the civil dimension of crisis response include two points: (1) the political will to implement the civilian component of security policy by the European Union institutions and member states, (2) the will to solve the problem of human resources. For the current and foreseeable Russian-European relations, the cooperation potential of the civilian component of crisis response is not included in the security policy. The research makes a significant contribution to the study of the European Union development problems, genesis and development parameters of the civil missions, and the Russian-European dialogue.
About the Author
O. Yu. SemenovHigher School of Economics – Saint-Petersburg (HSE University – St. Petersburg)
Russian Federation
Oleg Yu. Semenov
St. Petersburg
Competing Interests:
The author declared no potential conflicts of interests regarding the research, authorship, and / or publication of this article.
References
1. Gromyko A. A. To the vital issues: Europe and the modern world. Moscow-St. Petersburg: Nestor-Istoriia, 2017, 232. (In Russ.)
2. Kaveshnikov N. Yu. Institutional and political development of the European Union: systemic crisis and transformation options. World Economy and International Relations, 2017, 61(5): 14–24. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2017-61-5-14-24
3. Strezhneva M. V. Methodological aspects in the study of foreign policy and global role of the European Union. Polis. Political Studies, 2017, (6): 25–42. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2017.06.03
4. Arbatova N. K., Andreeva T. N., Basov F. A., Vasilev V. I., Voronov K. V., Zueva K. P., Kokeev A. M., Pavlova M. S., Sokolova P. S., Timofeev P. P., Cherkasova E. G., Shumitskaya E. V., Khorolskaya M. V. Strategic autonomy of the EU and prospects for cooperation with Russia. Moscow: Ves mir, 2020, 368. (In Russ.)
5. Potemkina O. Yu. Foreign policy of the European Union in the post-Lisbon period. Sovremennaya Yevropa, 2017, (5): 149–151. (In Russ.)
6. Smith M. The European Union and the global arena: in search of post-Brexit roles. Politics and Governance, 2019, 7(3): 83–92. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v7i3.2133
7. Ekengren M., Hollis S. Explaining the European Union's security role in practice. Journal of Common Market Studies, 2020, 58(3): 616–635. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12946
8. Kepe M., Black J., Melling J., Plumridge J. Exploring Europe’s capability requirements for 2035 and beyond. RAND, 2018, 43. URL: https://www.rand.org/randeurope/research/projects/eda-capability-requirements-2035.html (accessed 31 Mar 2022).
9. Security and defence in Europe, eds. Ramirez J. M., Biziewski J. Cham: Springer, 2020, 264.
10. Zhurkin V. V. Military policy of the European Union. Moscow: Mezhdunar. otnosheniia, 2014, 256. (In Russ.)
11. Arbatova N. K. Will European Union become a global power center? World Economy and International Relations, 2020, 64(6): 51–65. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2020-64-6-51-65
12. Arbatova N. K., Andreeva T. N., Vasiliev V. I., Voronov K. V., Zueva K. P., Kokeev A. M., Sokolova P. S., Timofeev P. P., Khorolskaya M. V., Cherkasova E. G., Shumitskaya E. V. A Global Strategy for European Union's foreign and security policy 2016. Moscow: IMEMO, 2017, 33. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20542/978-5-9535-0505-5
13. Danilov D. A. Formation of new instruments and mechanisms of the CSDP. European Union: facts and comments, 2018, (93): 74–78. (In Russ.)
14. Barrie D., Barry B., Boyd H., Childs N., Giegerich B. Europe’s defence requires offence. Survival, 2021, 63(1): 19–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/00396338.2021.1881249
15. Henke M. E. Networked cooperation: how the European Union mobilizes peacekeeping forces to project power abroad. Security Studies, 2019, 28(5): 901–934. https://doi.org/10.1080/09636412.2019.1662480
16. Novikova O. O. European Union in the system of international security: new instruments of crisis settlement. Polis. Political Studies, 2008, (4): 174–185. (In Russ.)
17. Shcherbak I. N. US's crisis response strategy in light of global challenges. Sovremennaya Yevropa, 2021, (4): 151–160. (In Russ.) http://dx.doi.org/10.15211/soveurope42021151160
18. Schimmel F. EU civilian crisis management in 2030: a test-run of scenario-based planning. Berlin: Forschungsinstitut der Deutschen Gesellschaſt für Auswärtige Politik, 2021, 10.
19. Pirozzi N. The EU’s comprehensive approach to crisis management. Brussels, 2013, 27.
20. Chivvis C. S. EU civilian crisis management. The record so far. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 2010, XIII+52.
21. Pond E. The EU’s test in Kosovo. The Washington Quarterly, 2008, 31(4): 97–112. https://doi.org/10.1162/wash.2008.31.4.97
22. Pirozzi N. The European Union and civilian crisis management aſter Lisbon. European Foreign Affairs Review, 2015, 20(2): 287–306.
23. Haber E. Primat der Stabilität. Der Pragmatismus aller Beteiligten ebnete den Weg für den Aufbau rechtsstaatlicher Strukturen im Kosovo. Internationale Politik, 2009, 64(7-8): 83–89.
24. Europe deploys towards a civil-military strategy for CSDP. Egmont Paper 49, eds. Biscop S., Coelmont J. Academia Press, 2011, 23.
25. Major C., Mölling C. Towards an EU Peacebuilding Strategy? European Parliament, 2010. URL: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/meetdocs/2009_2014/documents/sede/dv/sede260410peacebuildingstrategy_/sede260410peacebuildingstrategy_en.pdf (accessed 31 Mar 2022).
26. Zupančič R., Pejič N., Grilj B., Rodt A. P. The European Union rule of law mission in Kosovo: an effective conflict prevention and peace-building mission? Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies, 2018, 20(6): 599–617. https://doi.org/10.1080/19448953.2017.1407539
27. Mölling C., Schimmel F. Upgrading Europe’s civilian crisis management – a strategic planning process in ten steps. DGAP Policy Brief, (28). Berlin: Forschungsinstitut der Deutschen Gesellschaſt für Auswärtige Politik, 2020. URL: https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-71287-8 (accessed 31 Mar 2022).
28. Muehlmann T. Police restructuring in Bosnia-Herzegovina: problems of internationally-led security sector reform. Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding, 2008, 2(1): 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/17502970701810856
29. Fernandes S. ESDP and Russia: a decade of unfulfilled promise. Advances in military sociology: essays in honor of Charles C. Moskos (Contributions to Conflict Management, Peace Economics and Development, vol. 12, pt. 1), ed. Caforio G. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 2009, 233–258. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1572-8323(2009)000012A018
30. Danilov D. A. Russia-EU political relations: evolution and prospects. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. International Relations, 14(2): 121–138. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu06.2021.201
Review
For citations:
Semenov O.Yu. Genesis of the Crisis Response Civil Component in the European Union: Parameters, Problems, and Interaction with Russia. The Bulletin of Kemerovo State University. 2022;24(3):359-367. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2022-24-3-359-367