Preview

SibScript

Advanced search

Attitude to Personal Security during Identity Formation in University Students

https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2022-24-1-83-91

Abstract

The research featured the relationship between the indicators of identity and the characteristics of the attitude to personal security in university students. The study relied on M. Kuhn and T. McPartland’s Who am I questionnaire, M. Berzonski’s Questionnaire of Identity Styles adapted by E. P. Belinskaya et al., J. Chik and L. Tropp’s Aspects of Identity, A. A. Ozerina’s Professional Identity, and E. L. Soldatova’s Ego-Identity SEI-test. The attitude to personal safety was investigated by the methods developed by the author. The study involved 238 students of 1–5 year that were majoring in humanities. The cluster and regression analyses of the data obtained by the cross-sectional method identified the related characteristics of identity and attitudes to personal security, as well as their differences at different stages of training. The author revealed some general tendencies in the phenomena that occurred in students during the period of university study. Positive dynamics included the following trends. The professional position became more active (I as a subject of relations). The assessments of threat of losing one’s reputation and connections decreased. Senior students preferred a personal security strategy, i.e. they relied on themselves. Positive dynamics included the following trends. Superficial identity increased, while the autonomy in the awareness of one's own values and emotional component decreased. The assessment of psychological risks and that of criminal organizations increased, while common preventive efforts mostly decreased. Security strategies in terms of the macro environment also changed: senior students preferred adapting strategy (living in an authoritarian society) to individualizing (living in a humane and tolerant society). The article introduces some conclusions about the correlation of identity and attitude to personal security, as well as the complexity and multidirectional nature of their development in university students. 

About the Author

M. S. Ivanov
Kemerovo State University
Russian Federation

Kemerovo



References

1. Belinskaya E. P. Modern identity studies: from structural certainty to procedural incompleteness. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Psychology and Education, 2018, 8(1): 6–15. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu16.2018.101

2. Belinskaya E. P. The variability of self: an identity crisis or a crisis of knowledge about it? Psikhologicheskie Issledovaniya, 2015, 8(40). Available at: http://psystudy.ru/index.php/num/2015v8n43/1192-seryi43.html (accessed 10 Nov 2019). (In Russ.)

3. Belinskaya E. P. The problem of identity in modern social psychology. Cultural-historical approach: from L. S. Vygotsky to the XXI century, eds. Martsinkovskaya T. D., Orestova V. R., Gavrichenko O. V., Kiseleva E. A. Moscow: MPSU, 2018, 76–84. (In Russ.)

4. Asmolov A. G. Psychology of modernity: the challenges of uncertainty, complexity and diversity. Psikhologicheskie Issledovaniya, 2015, 8(40). Available at: http://psystudy.ru/index.php/num/2015v8n40/1109-asmolov40.html (accessed 2 Dec 2017). (In Russ.)

5. Leontiev D. A. The challenge of uncertainty as the key issue of the psychology of personality. Psikhologicheskie Issledovaniya, 2015, 8(40). Available at: http://psystudy.ru/index.php/num/2015v8n40/1110-leontiev40.html (accessed 2 Dec 2017). (In Russ.)

6. Bamberg M., De Fina A., Schiffrin D. Discourse and identity construction. Handbook of identity theory and research, eds. Schwartz S. J., Luyckx K., Vignoles V. L. N. Y.: Springer, 2011, 177–199. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7988-9_8

7. Martsinkovskaya T. D. Methodology of modern psychology: a change of paradigms?! Psikhologicheskie Issledovaniya, 2014, 7(36). Available at: http://psystudy.ru/index.php/num/2014v7n36/1012-martsinkovskaya36.html (accessed 2 Dec 2017). (In Russ.)

8. Benson C. The unthinkable boundaries of self: the role of negative emotional boundaries for the formation, maintenance, and transformation of identities. The self and others: positioning individuals and groups in personal, political, and cultural contexts, eds. Harré R., Moghaddam F. Westport: Praeger, 2003, 61–84.

9. Oyserman D., Destin M., Novin S. The context-sensitive future self: possible selves motivate in context, not otherwise. Self and Identity, 2014, 14(2): 173–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298868.2014.965733

10. Zaytseva Yu. E. Self-narrative as an instrument of identity construction: existential-narrative approach. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Series 16. Psychology. Pedagogy, 2016, (1): 118–136. (In Russ.)

11. McAdams D. P. Narrative identity. Handbook of identity theory and research, eds. Schwartz S. J., Luyckx K., Vignoles V. L. N. Y.: Springer, 2011, 99–115. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7988-9_5

12. Muravyeva O. I., Litvina S. A., Kruzhkova O. V., Bogomaz S. A. Russian young city-dwellers: structural features of urban identity. Vestnik Novosibirskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta, 2017, 7(1): 63–80. https://doi.org/10.15293/2226-3365.1701.05

13. Ivanov M. S. Identity threats in the system of attitudes to personal security. Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2019, 21(4): 974–981. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2019-21-4-974-981

14. Ivanov M. S. Assumptions of self-worth with a different attitudes to personal security threats. Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2020, 22(4): 992–999. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2020-22-4-992-999

15. Kimberg A. N. Psychology of personal safety: subject and problems in the perspective of the subjective approach. Chelovek. Soobshhestvo. Upravlenie, 2010, (1): 72–82. (In Russ.)

16. Baeva I. A. Psychological safety in education. St. Petersburg: Soiuz, 2002, 270. (In Russ.)

17. Dontsov A. I., Perelygina E. B., Zotova O. Yu., Mostikov S. V. Trust as a factor of psychological security in interethnic interaction. Social Psychology and Society, 2018, 9(2): 21–34. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17759/sps.2018090202

18. Krasnyanskaya T. M. Psychology of self-security. Pyatigorsk: PSLU, 2009, 279. (In Russ.)

19. Krasnyanskaya T. M., Tylets V. G. Fractal approach to the interpretation of psychological safety of the person. European Journal of Psychological Studies, 2015, (2): 48–57. https://doi.org/10.13187/ejps.2015.6.48

20. Fomenko G. Yu. Psychology of personal security: theoretical and methodological foundations of institutionalization. Chelovek. Soobshhestvo. Upravlenie, 2010, (1): 83–99. (In Russ.)

21. Ivanov M. S., Seryy A. V., Yanitskiy M. S. Mobility as strategy of providing personal security in postmodern society. The European Proceedings of Social & Behavioural Sciences: Intern. Conf. on research paradigms transformation in social sciences, Tomsk, 18–21 May 2017. Future Academy, 2018. Vol. 35. P. 1187–1196. https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2018.02.140

22. Ivanov M. S., Yanitskiy M. S. Attitude to personal security: concept, structure, value variation. Psychology of relations in the post-non-classical paradigm: Proc. Intern. Sci.-Prac. Conf., Belovo, 1–7 Jun 2015. Belovo: KuzSTU, 2015, 54–68. (In Russ.)

23. Ivanov M. S. Ensuring personal safety as a problem of psychology of the way of life, self-realization and personal identity. Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2015, (3-3): 128–133. (In Russ.)


Review

For citations:


Ivanov M.S. Attitude to Personal Security during Identity Formation in University Students. The Bulletin of Kemerovo State University. 2022;24(1):83-91. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2022-24-1-83-91

Views: 343


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2949-2122 (Print)
ISSN 2949-2092 (Online)