Mythology of Myth as the Foundation of Postmodern Culture
https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2022-24-1-42-49
Abstract
The article questions the appropriateness of using the concept of myth in relation to the XX century culture. The term originated in the German Romantic philosophy and philology. The current use of the concept of myth is mostly connected with the irrational side of reality. The concept of neo-mythologism can be applied to the epoch of Modernism because it preserved a substantial understanding of the myth. Post Modernism, however, understood the myth in a formal way, as an expressive means. This understanding was adopted by semiology and structural anthropology. In the contemporary society, the so-called quasi-myths have become an effective tool of controlling mass consciousness. Unsubstantial quasimyths tend to merge into a simulacrum of the mythology of myth. The article describes this simulacrum and reveals that neo-mythologism as a substance-oriented mentality is not peculiar to Post Modernism. Philologically speaking, today’s myth concerns the key issue of historical poetics, i.e. the relationship between tradition and creativity, where individual creativity is a statement of tradition and national myth. This article was originally published in English as a monograph chapter: Kuznetsov I. V. Mythology of Myth in Twentieth-Century Culture. Philological sciences: Modern scholarly discussions. LvivToruń: Liha-Pres, 2019. P. 64–78.
References
1. Grimm J. Deutsche Mythologie. Göttingen: Dieterich, 1835, XXX+710+CLXXVII.
2. Wundt W. Myth and religion. Moscow: Brokgaus-Efron, [1913], 416. (In Russ.)
3. Lotman Yu. M., Mints Z. G., Meletinsky E. M. Literature and myths. Myths of the peoples of the world, ed. Tokarev S. A. Moscow: Sov. entsikl., 1982, vol. 2, 58–65. (In Russ.)
4. Mints Z. G. About some neo-mythological texts in the works of Russian symbolists. Acta et commentationes universitatis Tartuensis, 1979, (459: A. Blok's work and Russian culture of the XX century: Blok's collection III): 76–120. (In Russ.)
5. Broytman S. N. Poetics of B. Pasternak’s poetic cycle Life is My Sister. Moscow: Progress-Traditsiia, 2007, 608. (In Russ.)
6. Losev A. F. Dialectics of myth. Myth – Number – Essence. Moscow: Mysl, 1994, 5–216. (In Russ.)
7. Barthes R. Myth today. Selected works: Semiotics. Poetics. Moscow: Progress; Univers, 1994, 72–130. (In Russ.)
8. Levi-Strauss C. Structural antropology. Moscow: Nauka, 1983, 535. (In Russ.)
9. Mead M. Culture and the world of childhood. Moscow: Nauka, 1988, 429. (In Russ.)
10. Baudrillard J. The consumer society: myths and structures. Moscow: Kulturnaia revoliutsiia; Respublika, 2006, 272. (In Russ.)
11. Pjatigorsky A. M. Mythological thinking: lectures on the phenomenology of myth. Moscow: Iazyki rus. kultury, 1996, 280. (In Russ.)
12. Horujy S. Gender or pre-gender? Notes on the ontology of the virtual. Voprosy Filosofii, 1997, (6): 53–69. (In Russ.)
13. Rudnev V. P. Myth. Dictionary of the ХХ century culture. Moscow: Agraf, 1997, 169–172. (In Russ.)
14. Khlebnikov V. Inventors' Union. Creations. Moscow: Sov. pisatel, 1986, 615–616. (In Russ.)
15. Veselovsky A. N. The poetics of plots. Historical poetics. Moscow: Vyssh. shk., 1989, 300–306. (In Russ.)
16. Kuznetsov I. V. The books of Ancient Russia (XI–XVII). Novosibirsk: NSTI, 2013, 140. (In Russ.)
17. Putilov B. N. Folklore and folk culture; In memoriam. St. Petersburg: Peterb. vostokovedenie, 2003, 457. (In Russ.)
18. Aksakov K. S. Some words about Gogol’s poem: Chichikov's Adventures, or Dead Souls. In: Aksakov K. S. Aksakov I. S. Literary criticism. Moscow: Sovremennik, 1981, 141–150. (In Russ.)
19. Meletinsky E. M. The poetics of myth. Moscow: Nauka, 1976, 408. (In Russ.)
20. Tyupa V. I. Discourse formations: essays on comparative rhetoric. Moscow: Iazyki slavianskoi kultury, 2010, 320. (In Russ.)
21. Shreider Y. M. Text, author, and semantics. Semiotika i informatika, 1976, (7): 153–169. (In Russ.)
22. Kuznetsov I. V. Adequacy and meaning-setting: two research models. Understanding: multidisciplinary research experience, eds. Brudny A. A., Utkin A. V., Yatsuta E. I. Moscow: Smysl, 2006, 69–74. (In Russ.)
23. Epstein M. N. The Russian language in the light of creative philology of research. Znamia, 2006, (1): 192–207. (In Russ.)
24. Epstein M. N. Constructive potential of the humanistics: can they change what research? Filosofskie nauki, 2008, (12): 34–55. (In Russ.)
25. Epstein M. N. The projective dictionary of the humanities. Moscow: NLO, 2017, 612. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Kuznetsov I.V. Mythology of Myth as the Foundation of Postmodern Culture. The Bulletin of Kemerovo State University. 2022;24(1):42-49. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2022-24-1-42-49
Views:
393
Email this article 