Preview

SibScript

Advanced search

The Concept of Uchitel / Uchenik (Teacher / Pupil): Motivating Signs

https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2021-23-3-847-854

Abstract

 The research was based on fifteen etymological and explanatory dictionaries of the Russian language and featured the motivating signs of the macroconcept uchitel / uchenik (teacher / pupil). Conceptual, descriptive, and interpretive analyses revealed 46 motivating signs, which indicates the long history of the macroconcept. The signs constituted thirteen blocks: 1. Results of cognitive activity (expertise, knowledge, skills, views, and experience). 2. The process and result of learning (teach, instruct, hold classes, inculcate, enrich, acquire, preach, train, study, memorize, learn). 3. Methods of teaching (instruction, teaching). 4. Method of memorization (repeat, get used to, get used, be adjusted to). 5. Participants of the educational process (teacher, student, lecturer, learner, mentor, educator), head of teaching, cleric, novice). 6. Mode of behavior (custom) 7. Commitment (admirer, fan, follower). 8. Violent ways of teaching (beat, punish, force). 9. Science (science, scientist, learning). 10. Educational institutions (school, college). 11. Effort (try). 12. Trust (trust). 13. Learning activity (learning, learning activity, studies, curricular, lesson, schooling, textbook). The signs grew less numerous with time: the contemporary Russian linguistic worldview contains only 41 out of the original 46. 

About the Author

M. G. Iurchenko
B. Yeltsin Kyrgyz-Russian Slavic University
Kyrgyzstan

Bishkek 



References

1. Arnautova O. A. The realization of the core of conceptual area "uchitel – uchenie – uchenik" in the Russian linguoculture. Izvestiya YuFU. Tekhnicheskie nauki, 2011, (10): 8–15. (In Russ.)

2. Aroutiounova N. D. Metaphor in the language of feelings. Language and the world of man, 2nd ed. Moscow: Iaz. rus. kultury, 1999, 385–399. (In Russ.)

3. Babushkin А. P. Types of concepts in the lexico-phraseological semantics of the language. Voronezh: VGU, 1996, 104. (In Russ.)

4. Vorkachev S. G. The concept of happiness: conceptual and figurative components. Izvestiia RAN. Seriia literatury i iazyka, 2001, 60(6): 47–58. (In Russ.)

5. Vorkachev S. G. Linguaculturology, linguistic personality, concept: the formation of an anthropocentric paradigm in linguistics. Philological Sciences, 2001, (1): 64–72. (In Russ.)

6. Karasik V. I. Language circle: personality, concepts, discourse. Volgograd: Peremena, 2002, 477. (In Russ.)

7. Kolesov V. V. Reflection of the Russian mentality in the word. Man in the mirror of sciences. Leningrad: Izd-vo Leningr. un-ta, 1989, 106–125. (In Russ.)

8. Kolesov V. V. Concepts of culture: image – concept – symboll. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Seriia 2. Istoriia, iazykoznanie, literaturovedenie, 1992, (3): 30–40. (In Russ.)

9. Kolesov V. V. Mental characteristics of the Russian word in the language and in philosophical intuition. Languages and ethnic mentality, ed. Tarlanov Z. K. Petrozavodsk: PGU, 1995, 13–24. (In Russ.)

10. Kolesov V. V. Philosophy of the Russian word. St. Petersburg: Iuna, 2002, 448. (In Russ.)

11. Maslova V. A. Cognitive linguistics. Minsk: TetraSystems, 2004, 256. (In Russ.)

12. Maslova V. A. Introduction to linguaculturology. Moscow: Nasledie, 1997, 207. (In Russ.)

13. Maslova V. A. Linguoculture. Moscow: Academiia, 2001, 202. (In Russ.)

14. Pimenova M. V. Conceptual research methodology. Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2002, (4): 100–105. (In Russ.)

15. Stepanov Yu. S. In the three-dimensional space of language: Semiotic problems of linguistics, philosophy, art. Moscow: Nauka, 1985, 335. (In Russ.)

16. Stepanov Yu. S. Concepts. Fragile framework of civilization. Moscow: Iazyki slavianskikh kultur, 2007, 248. (In Russ.)

17. Pimenova M. V. Conceptology at the present stage (methods of investigation of conceptual structures). Humanitarian Vector, 2017, 12(5): 13–22. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21209/1996-7853-2017-12-5-13-22

18. Maslova V. A., Pimenova M. V. Codes of linguoculture, 3rd ed. Moscow: Flinta; Nauka, 2018, 180. (In Russ.)

19. Pimenova M. V. Method of analysis and theoretical concerns of the Kemerovo school of conceptual studies. Naukovii visnik Khersonskogo derzhavnogo universitetu. Seriia "Lingvistika", 2013, (18): 50–59. (In Russ.)

20. Pimenova M. V. The types of concepts and the stages of conceptual structure analysis. Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2013, (2-2): 127–131. (In Russ.)

21. Pimenova M. V. Heart concept: image, concept, symbol. Kemerovo: KemGU, 2007, 500. (In Russ.)

22. Shpet G. G. The inner form of the word: Studies and variations on Humboldt’s themes, 4th ed. Moscow: URSS, 2009, 217. (In Russ.)

23. Kabachenko E. G. Concepts "teacher" and "pupil" in the minds of present-day teachers (figurative component). Lingvokulturologiia, 2009, (3): 83–91. (In Russ.)

24. Zarechneva E. N. Experiment research of the concept "teacher": linguistic-cultural aspect. Mir nauki, kultury, obrazovaniya, 2008, (3), 52–56. (In Russ.)

25. Isupov K. G. Cultural concept "teacher / student" against the background of Russian "truth". Dialogue in education: dedicated to Professor A. P. Valitskaya. St. Petersburg: Sankt-Peterburgskoe filosofskoe obshchestvo, 2002, 27–44. (In Russ.)


Review

For citations:


Iurchenko M.G. The Concept of Uchitel / Uchenik (Teacher / Pupil): Motivating Signs. The Bulletin of Kemerovo State University. 2021;23(3):847-854. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2021-23-3-847-854

Views: 372


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2949-2122 (Print)
ISSN 2949-2092 (Online)