The concept of White Man’s Burden: From Fiction to Political Discourse

The white man’s burden is a linguacultural concept subject to diachronic dynamics and semantic transformation. Originating in Rudyard Kipling’s 1899 poem, it immediately developed a system of stable subframes (the missionary, the traveler, and the master) in the literature of that period. Subsequently, it underwent a complete dynamic cycle, from its detailed artistic development in literature at the turn of the 20th century, through the stage of ideological instrumentalization in colonial political discourse (W. Churchill, T. Roosevelt), to its contemporary critical reinterpretation. Combining diachronic linguacultural studies (E.V. Budaev, O.N. Kondratieva, E.A. Nakhimova, A.P. Chudinov) and discursive-cognitive analysis (A.P. Minyar-Belorucheva), the authors identified the mechanisms and results of this radical semantic inversion. In the modern political and media environments, the geopolitical frame of the white man’s burden has shifted from the opposition of metropolis vs. colony to the conflict between the Global North and the Global South. The axiological aspect has inverted from the rhetoric of a "civilizing mission" to the critique of neocolonialism. Visual and media representations have turned from the straightforward caricatures of the 19th century to today’s complex and ironic imagery. The derivative concept of "dead white men" marks a culturological expansion that shifts the critique into the plane of deconstructing the Western cultural canon. As a linguacultural concept, the white man’s burden serves as a representative model for studying how historical ideologemes surface with reversed semantic valence to interpret current conflicts.

1. Askoldov S. A. Concept and word. Russian literature: From the theory of literature to structure, ed. Neroznak V. P. Moscow. Academia, 1997, 267–280. (In Russ.)

2. Budaev E. V., Kondratyeva O. N., Nakhimova E. A., Chudinov A. P. Methods of diachronic analysis of political metaphors. Political Linguistics, 2016, (6): 18–31. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/xqzqln

3. Gavrilova M. V. Political discourse as object of linguistic analysis. Polis. Political studies, 2004, (3): 127–139. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2004.03.13

4. Dibas O. A., Boichuk S. S. The conflict of imperatives in creating an empire and national traditions in English society during the second half of the 19th – early 20th centuries. History magazine – Researches, 2019, (3): 29–37. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.7256/2454-0609.2019.3.29851

5. Dumov A. V., Kudashov V. I., Lichargin D. V. "Information" vs. "relationship": Collisions and Solutions. Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriia: Gumanitarnye i obshchestvennye nauki, 2019, 3(4): 348–354. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21603/2542-1840-2019-3-4-348-354

6. Ibraev E. E. Evolution of the concept of "white man’s burden" in the British cinema in 20th century. Vestnik MGIMO-Universiteta, 2016, (4): 26–36. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/wxokff

7. Ivanenko V. The white man’s burden: Chasing a mirage. Russia in Global Affairs, 2024, (3): 30–46. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31278/1810-6439-2024-22-3-30-46

8. Karasik V. I., Slyshkin G. G. Lingvocultural concept as an element of linguistic consciousness. Methodology of modern psycholinguistics, ed. Pichshalnikova V. A. Moscow: IL RAS, 2003, 50–56. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/wenxyn

9. Karasik V. I. Language circle: Personality, concepts, discourse. Volgograd: Peremena, 2002, 477. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/ugqamp

10. Kovalev N. A. Developing the "Cold War" concept in political discourse (by the material of the American mass media). Philology. Theory & Practice, 2017, (7-1): 98–102. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/yqeefl

11. Kravchenko M. A. Metalanguage reflection in fiction: From the object of reflection to the typology of reflexives. SibScript, 2025, 27(1): 85–96. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21603/sibscript-2025-27-1-85-96

12. Creolized text: Semantic perception, ed. Vashunina I. V. Moscow: IL RAS, 2020, 206. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/lyuymp

13. Kubryakova E. S. On the status of cognitive linguistics among other cognitive sciences and its role in the research of world categorization and conceptualization processes. Cognitive studies of language, 2010, (7): 13–18. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/pngwhv

14. Minyar-Beloroucheva A. Paradigm-dependent political discourse metaphors as a subject of interdisciplinary research. MAGIA INNO: Integrative tendencies in linguistics and linguistic didactics, ed. Novikov D. N. Moscow: MGIMO, 2019, vol. 1, 170–176. (In Russ.)

15. Proskurin S. G., Proskurina A. V. Duality in language and culture: Values and meta-concepts. SibScript, 2024, 26(1): 37–48. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21603/sibscript-2024-26-1-37-48

16. Said E. Orientalism. Western conceptions of the orient. 2nd ed. St. Petersburg: Russkii Mir, 2016, 671. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/wlbush

17. Strueva Yu. V. The evolution of images of R. Kipling’s imperial myth in 20th-century cinema. Issues of Russian and foreign history, political science, sociology, and education: Proc. Intern. Conf., Yaroslavl, 5–6 Mar 2020. Yaroslavl: YSPU, 2020, pt. 2, 88–97. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/lrzbfv

18. Fedotov A. A. "The White Man’s Burden" and "The Last Prayer". Na puti k grazhdanskomu obshchestvu, 2020, (1): 3–6. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/nhihvx

19. Cherkashina T. N. The "special relationship" of the UK and the USA: The test of time. The Power of History – the History of Power, 2024, 10(5): 47–57. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/einggb

20. Chugunov D. A. "The white man’s burden" in light of intercultural hermeneutics. The New Past, 2022, (3): 24–36. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18522/2500-3224-2022-3-24-37

21. Chudinov A. P. Political linguistics. Moscow: Flinta; Nauka, 2006, 256. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/sdqkxt

22. Buzan B. A new cold war? The case for a general concept. International Politics, 2024, 61(2): 239–257. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41311-024-00559-8

23. Cannadine D. Ornamentalism: How the British saw their empire. Penguin Books, 2002, 263.

24. Kress G., Van Leeuwen T. Reading images: The grammar of visual design. New York: Routledge, 1996, 288.

25. Mahoney J. The Cold War as a label, meaning, and referent. Social Science History, 2025, 49(4): 1007–1024. https://doi.org/10.1017/ssh.2024.41

26. Shalhope R. E. Resurrecting Dead White Males. Reviews in American History, 2005, 33(2): 162–168.

27. Toye R. Churchill’s Empire: The world that made him and the world he made. Henry Holt and Co., 2010, 464.

28. Watts С. P. ‘Pax Britannica’. Encyclopedia of the Age of Imperialism, 1800–1914, ed. Hodge C. C. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 2007, vol. II, 547–550.

29. Wintle M. J. Eurocentrism: History, identity, white man’s burden. London-New York: Routledge, 2021, 291.

30. Zamani Alavijeh H. Racial ideologies and imperial discourses: A new historicist reading of Kipling’s "The White Man’s Burden". Journal of Critical Studies in Language and Literature, 2024, 5(3): 7–13. https://doi.org/10.46809/jcsll.v5i3.263