Axiology of Translational Discourse: Criteria System of Translation Quality Assessment
https://doi.org/10.21603/sibscript-2026-28-4-604-616
EDN: HZLYFQ
Abstract
The paper explores the epistemological aspects of text/discourse generation, focusing on ontological, methodological, and axiological dimensions. Translation discourse is examined from the perspective of the translation episteme and the translation environment. The translation episteme is represented by cognition (ontology), synergy (methodology), and harmony (axiology). The axiological component of translation discourse has a systemic nature, which requires a wider range of quality assessment criteria. The theoretical framework is illustrated by excerpts from Lewis Carroll’s Alice in Wonderland and their Russian and French translations produced in different historical periods, from Carroll’s contemporaries to the modern day. To estimate translation quality, the authors employ both traditional axiological criteria, such as adequacy and equivalence, and their own proposed criteria, such as harmony/disharmony and ecological / unecological. They represent a translation quality assessment framework centered on communication participants. The harmony / disharmony criterion evaluates the translation from the perspective of the translator, while the ecological / unecological criterion assesses it from the standpoint of the recipient belonging to a foreign language and culture. Each translation version satisfies specific criteria, which signifies the importance of their differentiation and systematization in expanding the research field of translation axiology.
About the Authors
Liydmila V. KushninaRussian Federation
Scopus Author ID 57188668542
Competing Interests:
The author declared no potential conflict of interests regarding the research, authorship, and / or publication of this article.
Anna I. Krivoruchko
Russian Federation
Scopus Author ID 57193132855
Competing Interests:
The author declared no potential conflict of interests regarding the research, authorship, and / or publication of this article.
References
1. Alekseeva L. M., Shutemova N. V. Typology of translation. Perm: PSNRU, 2012, 198. (In Russ.)
2. Alikina E. V., Georgieva N. Yu., Enbaeva L. V. et al. Translation theory in the classical and modern research paradigm: Ontology, methodology, and axiology. Moscow: Flinta, 2020, 336. (In Russ.)
3. Alikina E. V., Kushnina L. V., Moshchanskaya E. Yu., Shvetsova Yu. O., Alekseeva L. M., Mamonova E. Yu., Plastinina N. A. Theoretical foundations of the methodology of teaching translation. Moscow: Flinta, 2023, 140. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/lxvfbt
4. Aristov A. Yu. Precedent phenomenon of the fairy tale by C. Dodgson (L. Carroll) "Alice in Wonderland". Izvestia: Herzen University Journal of Humanities & Sciences, 2008, (70-1): 44–49. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/kuvqgb
5. Garbovsky N. K. Theory of translation. Moscow: MSU, 2004, 544. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/qqvian
6. Drozhaschikh N. V. Ecology of language and culture: Recurrence of meaning. The Ecology of Language at the Crossroads of Sciences: Intern. Sci. Conf., Tyumen, 11–13 Nov 2010. Tyumen: TyumSU, 2011, pt. 1, 29–35. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/rtqzbv
7. Kalashnikova E. In Russian with love. Interviews with translators. Moscow: NLO, 2008, 608. (In Russ.)
8. Knyazheva E. A. Aspects of translation quality problem. Lomonosov Translation Studies Journal, 2024, 17(1): 98–118. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.55959/MSU2074-6636-22-2024-17-1-98-118
9. Knyazheva E. A. Translation quality assessment: History, theory, and practice. 2nd ed. Moscow: Flinta, 2023, 348. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/ldiwlf
10. Kotyurova M. P., Bazhenova E. A. Culture of scientific speech: Text and its editing. 2nd ed. Perm: ZUIEP, 2007, 281. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/jdgryn
11. Kotyurova M. P., Bazhenova E. A., Kushnina L. V., Solovyova N. V., Tikhomirova L. S. Discursive foundations of speech production: Scientific text – new knowledge – translation. Moscow: Flinta, 2024, 300. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/cqfgpp
12. Kushnina L. V., Plyusnina E. M. Ecology of translation: Prerequisites for its origin and paths of development. Perm: PSNRU, 2016. (In Russ.)
13. Kushnina L. V., Fomenko E. A. Axiology factors: Translation harmony vs ecotranslation. Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State University, 2024, (8): 183–191. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.47475/1994-2796-2024-490-8-183-191
14. Pesina S. A. Translation studies in theory. Moscow: Flinta, 2023, 300. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/bpkypu
15. Pym E. Exploring translation theories. St. Petersburg: SPbSU, 2018, 255. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/ohlyhf
16. Proshina Z. G. Ecotranslatology as a model of translation. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Series 9. Philology. Oriental Studies. Journalism, 2016, (4): 100–109. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu09.2016.408
17. Rubinstein S. L. The principles of general psychology. St. Petersburg: Piter, 2009, 713. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/yxemdw
18. Sdobnikov V. V. Translation and communicative situation. Moscow: Flinta, Nauka, 2015, 464. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/qdxtbl
19. Skryabina A. M. Ideas of the English Enlightenment in the Lewis Carroll’s fairy tale "Alice in Wonderland". Vestnik of North-Eastern Federal University, 2018, (6): 118–123. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/ysqlgp
20. Fomenko E. A. Features of text perception by a foreign recipient: Modeling ecological reception of translation. Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State University, 2025, (9): 173–180. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.47475/1994-2796-2025-503-9-173-180
21. Khomutova T. N., Orekhova E. V., Silkina O. M. et al. Integral Linguistics. Chelyabinsk: SUSU, 2023, 267. (In Russ.)
22. Chistova E. V. Ecocognitive approach to the methodology and didactics of translation: A management case. Translation, Translation Studies, and Translation Didactics: The East and Northeast of Russia, ed. Gavrilenko N. N. Moscow: Flinta, 2025, 186–209. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/dhapnn
23. Chistova E. V. Eco-cognitive model of translation activity: Methodological boundaries and perspectives. Synergy of Languages & Cultures 2021: Interdisciplinary Studies. St. Petersburg: SPbSU, 2022, 116–128. https://elibrary.ru/iddjbu
24. Hu G. Eco-Translatology. Towards an eco-paradigm springer of translation studies. Singapor, 2020, 312. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-2260-4
25. Lederer M. La traduction d’auhourd’hui: le modèle interprétatif. Paris: Hachette, 1994, 224.
26. Sandron E. Alice et les merveilles françaises. TransLittérature, 2003–2004, (26): 12–17.
27. Snell-Hornby M. Translation studies. An integrated approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamin Publishing Company, 1988, 172.
Review
For citations:
Kushnina L.V., Krivoruchko A.I. Axiology of Translational Discourse: Criteria System of Translation Quality Assessment. SibScript. 2026;28(4):604-616. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21603/sibscript-2026-28-4-604-616. EDN: HZLYFQ
JATS XML
































