Preview

SibScript

Advanced search

Epistolary Discourse of Prisoners of War: An Axiological Aspect of Czech POWs’ Personal Letters (1916–1918)

https://doi.org/10.21603/sibscript-2026-28-4-591-603

EDN: BDFTNR

Abstract

Humanitarian anthropology includes such a relevant topic as imprisonment. This study models the axiological worldview of World War I prisoners of war (POWs) based on the correspondence written by Austro-Hungarian Czechs between 1916 and 1918. The linguistic analysis of this epistolary discourse makes it possible to identify several value dominants. POW epistolary discourse strongly depends on extralinguistic factors, including the communicative space of the communicants. Presented in speech activity as natural written speech, it constitutes a discursive practice. Despite censorship filters, the natural written speech of POWs remains a significant and objective source for identifying the value dominants within the discursive reflection of this social community. The epistolary discourse of Czech POWs is determined by historical, cultural, political, national, psychological, group, individual, and genre-related factors. The axiological context of this epistolary discourse is represented by a specific set of high-frequency linguistic units with axiological semantics.

About the Author

Evgeniy V. Evpak
Kemerovo State University, Russia, Kemerovo
Russian Federation

Scopus Author ID 57210107984


Competing Interests:

The author declared no potential conflict of interests regarding the research, authorship, and / or publication of this article.



References

1. Abdrashitov E. E. Letters from prisoners of war of World War I as a channel of communication. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Istoriya, 2012, (3): 30–35. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/pesvpb

2. Arutiunova N. D. Language and human world. 2nd ed. Moscow: IaRK, 1999, 896. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/ylawar

3. Bazanov S. N. Slavic prisoners of war in Russia during the World War I. Trudy Instituta rossiiskoi istorii, 2013, (11): 171–184. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/sdziol

4. Belunova N. I. Friendly letters from the creative intelligentsia of the late 19th – early 20th centuries (genre and text of the letter). St. Petersburg: SPbSU, 2004, 140. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/ttjfkr

5. Benko J. Repatriation of prisoners of war from Russia to the Habsburg Monarchy in the context of manifestations of social radicalism in the last year of the First World War. Social consequences of the wars and conflicts of the 20th century: Historical memory, ed. Serepionova E. P. Moscow-St. Petersburg: Nestor-Istoriia, 2014, 75–91. (In Russ.)

6. Borisyonok Yu. A., Doronov M. Yu. Slavic reciprocity of the Skopinsky District: Prisoners of war and migrants of the First World War in the Russian outback. Slavic Almanac, 2023, (1-2): 69–79. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31168/2073-5731.2023.1-2.1.04

7. Bocharova Z. S., Golubeva M. I. The situation of Russian combatants in France after the First World War (based on materials from soldiers letters). Modern History of Russia, 2025, 15(4): 792–807. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/aobrpu

8. Gagkuev R. G. General M. Janin and his diaries and memoirs about Russia. In: Janen M. With a mission and a warring Russia. 1916–1917. My mission is in Siberia. 1918–1920. Memoirs, diaries, articles. Moscow: Kuchkovo Pole Museum; Voevoda, 2023, 9–62. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/xevhie

9. Golev N. D. Linguistic-personological hypothesis of linguistic consistency. General theoretical and typological problems of linguistics, ed. Trofimova U. M. Biysk: V. M. Shukshin AltSAE, 2014, iss. 3, 6–12. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/tciwdp

10. Demchenko L. V. Prisoners of World War I in Omsk. Izvestiia Omskogo gosudarstvennogo istoriko-kraevedcheskogo muzeia, 1999, (7): 386–388. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/ybmndn

11. Dudekova G. Social consequences of World War I: Impulses and results of the latest research. Social consequences of the wars and conflicts of the 20th century: Historical memory, ed. Serepionova E. P. Moscow-St. Petersburg: Nestor-Istoriia, 2014, 19–32. (In Russ.)

12. Dulatov B. K. World War One prisoners of war of Slavic origin in Simbirsk governorate (on the materials of the State Archive of Ulyanovsk oblast). Slavyanovedenie, 2018, (4): 81–90. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31857/S0869544X0000468-7

13. Dulatov B. K. Postal correspondence of Austro-Hungarian and German prisoners of war of the Omsk military district as a source for studying the conditions of their detention in captivity. Rusin, 2020, (60): 97–119. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17223/18572685/60/6

14. Evpak E. V. Letters of Czech prisoners of war (1916–1918): Value dominants. Slavic languages in the context of modern challenges: Theses of XI Intern. Sci. Conf., Tomsk, 13–14 May 2025. Program. Tomsk: TSU, 2025, 17. (In Russ.)

15. Evpak E. V. The value dominants of the epistolary of prisoners of war: Personal letters from Czech (1916–1918) and Serbian prisoners of war (1941). Slavic languages in the context of modern challenges: Theses of XII Intern. Sci. Conf., Tomsk, 16–17 Mar 2026. Tomsk: TSU, 2026, 26. (In Russ.)

16. Efremova A. Yu., Kosheleva A. I. Prisoners of war in the Penza province during the First World War. Man and society in conditions of wars and revolutions: Proc. All-Russian Sci. Conf., Samara, 11 Dec 2014. Samara: SamSTU, 2014, iss. 1, 108–112. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/tkzeth

17. Ispovednikov D. Yu., Starodubtsev G. S. Prisoners of the World War I in Siberia and Russian Far East in the focus of international humanitarian law. Socio-Political Sciences, 2021, 11(3): 103–111. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33693/2223-0092-2021-11-3-103-111

18. Karasik V. I. Linguistic semiotic modeling of values. Political Linguistics, 2012, (1): 43–50. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/owuzrl

19. Karasik V. I. Values as culturally significant guidelines for behavior. Humanitarian technologies in the modern world: Proc. VII Intern. Sci.-Prac. Conf., Kaliningrad, 30 May – 1 Jun 2019. Kaliningrad: Western Branch of RANEPA, 2019, 22–25. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/upnvym

20. Karasik V. I. Worldview as an object of axiological linguistics. Languages, literatures and cultures of the peoples of Russia in modern academic science: Proc. Intern. Sci.-Prac. Conf., Kazan, 9–10 Oct 2024. Kazan: AS RT, 2024, 183–188. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/qopxeq

21. Kishkin L. N. According to the opinion of the Russian emigration in Prague: Cultural life (1920–1930s). Slavyanovedenie, 1995, (4): 17–26. (In Russ.)

22. Kryuchkov I. V. Czech and Slovak prisoners of war in the Central Caucasus in 1914–1917. Social consequences of the wars and conflicts of the 20th century: Historical memory, ed. Serepionova E. P. Moscow-St. Petersburg: Nestor-Istoriia, 2014, 91–102. (In Russ.)

23. Kubryakova E. S. Discourse and the structure of knowledge behind it. Language. Personalities. Text, ed. Toporov V. N. Moscow: IaSK, 2005, 23–33. (In Russ.)

24. Kuznetsov S. I. World War I prisoners of War in Japan, 1914–1918. Vestnik Buryatskogo nauchnogo centra SO RAN, 2024, (2): 41–46. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31554/2222-9175-2024-54-41-46

25. Kurjanovich A. V. Epistolary picture of the world: To question the notion of defining the specifics. Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2014, (2): 16–20. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/rwtyod

26. Lebedeva N. B., Koryukina E. A. Genre writing and speech personality: Typology and portraiture. In: Golev N. D., Melnik N. V., Kim L. G. et al. Linguistic personality: Modeling, typology, and portraiture. Siberian linguistic personology. Moscow: LENAND, 2014, pt. 1, 291–308. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/rmwhpz

27. Lebedeva N. B., Rabenko T. G. Texts of natural written speech as a manifestation of the value dominants of an ordinary native speaker (based on the material of parent’s letters). Kul'tura i tekst, 2020, (3): 112–125. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.37386/2305-4077-2020-3-112-125

28. Lossky N. O. Value and Being: God and the Kingdom of God as the basis of values. Kharkov: Folio; Moscow: AST, 2000, 864. (In Russ.)

29. Nachtigall R. Prisoners of war in Russia during World War I. Quaestio Rossica, 2014, (1): 142–156. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/seyxmx

30. Makarov M. L. Fundamentals of discourse theory. Moscow: Gnozis, 2003, 280. (In Russ.)

31. Melentyev A. V. Prisoners of war camps on the Kyshtym Land. Archives in Society and Society in Archives: Proc. 8 All-Russian Sci.-Prac. Conf., Chelyabinsk, 19 Sep 2025. Chelyabinsk, 2025, 207–212. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/ncqqvk

32. Melnikov A. V. Russia through the eyes of Czech prisoners of war. Nauchnyi lider, 2022, (52): 17–19. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/mxkmyc

33. Ostroukhov A. I. The position of Czechs and Slovaks in Russian captivity in the period of the First World War (on materials of the Prague archives). Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta. Seriia: Istoriia i politicheskie nauki, 2009, (1): 85–92. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/puznmt

34. Ostroukhov A. I. The position of Czechs and Slovaks in Russian captivity in the period of the First World War (on the materials of the Russian archives). Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta. Seriia: Istoriia i politicheskie nauki, 2010, (4-5): 58–63. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/ncwgkl

35. Pudovkin S. I. Foreign prisoners of war in the Urals during the First World War. Gorokhov Readings: Proc. fifth Regional Museum Conf., Chelyabinsk, 7 Nov 2014. Chelyabinsk: Chelyabinsk State Museum of Local Lore, 2014, 164–168. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/tlhbnd

36. Rabenko T. G. Axiological dominants of the diary genre (based on the material of personal diaries). Sibirskii Filologicheskii Zhurnal, 2020, (2): 302–313. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17223/18137083/71/25

37. Rabenko T. G., Denisova E. S., Chardyntseva A. D. Communicative-pragmatic properties of addressing in virtual pedagogical discourse: Insights from school chats. Nauchnyi Dialog, 2024, 13(9): 149–168. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2024-13-9-149-168

38. Rokina G. V. Austro-Hungarian prisoners of war in World War Mari Territiry. Social consequences of the wars and conflicts of the 20th century: Historical memory, ed. Serepionova E. P. Moscow-St. Petersburg: Nestor-Istoriia, 2014, 102–113. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/sboxdf

39. Rokina G. V. Austro-Hungarian prisoners in the First World War in the district towns of Kazan Province (Gubernia). Vestnik of the Mari State University. Chapter "History. Law", 2017, 3(1): 12–22. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/ymzgjn

40. Samovich A. L. Content of letters from the Russian captivity during World War I. Istoricheskie, filosofskie, politicheskie i iuridicheskiye nauki, kulturologiia i iskusstvovedenie. Voprosy teorii i praktiki, 2013, (4-2): 160–163. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/pwgfvf

41. Serapionova E. P. The policy of the Czechoslovak authorities in relation to legionnaires, prisoners of war, and emigrants who returned from Russia. Social consequences of the wars and conflicts of the 20th century: Historical memory, ed. Serepionova E. P. Moscow-St. Petersburg: Nestor-Istoriia, 2014, 113–128. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/actqxm

42. Stepanova L. I. Essays on Czech phraseology history. St. Petersburg: SPbSU, 2003, 206. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/qrdcyh

43. Sulyak S. G. Rusins in the memoirs of the participants of the Great War. Rusin, 2016, (2): 73–92. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17223/18572685/44/6

44. Sushko A. V., Petin D. I. Conversion of the Czechs to orthodoxy in Omsk: Spirituality, ideology, everyday life. 1916–19. Herald of an Archivist, 2022, (2): 597–610. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-0101-2022-2-597-610

45. Tkachenko S. B. Forms of postcards for correspondence of prisoners of World War I (1914–1918). Postage stamp and postcard: Creators, publishers, and collectors: Proc. IX Sci.-Prac. seminar, St. Petersburg, 9 Oct 2018. St. Petersburg, 2018, 320–328. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/uryfzp

46. Tolstaya S. M. Evaluation category in language and text. Evaluation category and value system in language and culture, eds. Belova O. V., Gura A. V. Moscow: Indrik, 2015, 11–32. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/xdarqz

47. Shirokova A. G., Vasilyeva V. F., Jedlicka A. Czech language. Moscow: MSU, 1990, 342. (In Russ.)

48. Michl Jan. Legionáři a Československo. Praha: Naše vojsko, 2009, 332.


Review

For citations:


Evpak E.V. Epistolary Discourse of Prisoners of War: An Axiological Aspect of Czech POWs’ Personal Letters (1916–1918). SibScript. 2026;28(4):591-603. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21603/sibscript-2026-28-4-591-603. EDN: BDFTNR

Views: 131

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2949-2122 (Print)
ISSN 2949-2092 (Online)