Preview

SibScript

Advanced search

Effect of Egoism on Economic Consciousness

https://doi.org/10.21603/sibscript-2026-28-2-279-292

EDN: FMNXLB

Abstract

Economy and morality are two basic areas of human life whose correlation remains underestimated. Russia is undergoing profound socio-economic transformations, shifting from the free market to the state capitalism. The article describes the effect of personal egoism on attitudes toward state economy, market economy, state capitalism, state regulation and state planning of the economy, economic inequality, progressive taxation, private entrepreneurship, competition, and money. The sample included 287 respondents aged 18–52 (M = 25.1; SD = 7.9; 44% male). The following research instruments were employed: Dispositional Egoism Scale (K. Muzdybaev); Questionnaire of Attitude toward State Involvement in the Economy (I. V. Nekhorosheva); Procedure for Studying Economic and Psychological Personality Traits (A. L. Zhuravlev, N. A. Zhuravleva); Subjective Economic WellBeing Questionnaire (V. A. Khaschenko); Attitude toward Competition Questionnaire (K3) (N. A. Akhadova). Respondents with a higher level of egoism demonstrated higher economic aspirations (p < 0.01), attached much more importance to money (p < 0.001), and were more favorable towards competition (p < 0.001), market economy (p < 0.001), and private capital (p < 0.01). They usually agreed with the principle that "when in business, profit is more important than morality" (p < 0.001). Respondents with a lower level of egoism preferred a planned distribution economy (p < 0.01) and state capitalism (p < 0.001). They were more concerned about the economic stratification of society (p < 0.001), less favorable to competition and competitive struggle (p < 0.001), and more negative to the so-called "Law of the Jungle" (p < 0.001). However, both groups positively assessed the impact of small businesses on the national economy and demonstrated a favorable attitude toward entrepreneurship, as well as supported progressive taxation and enhanced state economic planning.

About the Authors

Inna V. Nekhorosheva
State University of Education
Russian Federation

Moscow

Scopus Author ID: 35222205000


Competing Interests:

The authors declared no potential conflict of interests regarding the research, authorship, and / or publication of this article.



Natalia S. Kramarenko
State University of Education
Russian Federation

Moscow


Competing Interests:

The authors declared no potential conflict of interests regarding the research, authorship, and / or publication of this article.



References

1. Akhadova N. A. Features of the attitude towards competition in the spheres of politics and entrepreneurship in modern Russia: Cand. Psychol. Sci. Diss. St. Petersburg, 2004, 209. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/nnbqkb

2. Baleva M. V., Kornienko D. S., Yachmeneva N. P. The role of the Dark triad and materialistic orientation in evaluating an ethically unfounded economic decision. RUDN Journal of Psychology and Pedagogics, 2023, 20(1): 24–40. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-1683-2023-20-1-24-40

3. Bogomolov O. T. Economy and social environment. Economy and social environment: Insufficiently realized mutual influence. Scientific notes and essays, ed. Bogomolov O. T. Moscow: InES, 2008, 8–26. (In Russ.)

4. Glaziev S. Yu. Galbraith: Return, ed. S. D. Bodrunov. Moscow: Cultural Revolution, 2017. 424 p. Revieved by S. Yu. Glaziev. Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniya, 2017, (10): 165–169. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.7868/S0132162517100208

5. Glaziev S. Yu. Moral principles in economic behavior and development: the most important resource for Russia's revival. Economy and social environment: Insufficiently realized mutual influence. Scientific notes and essays, ed. Bogomolov O. T. Moscow: InES, 2008, 406–421. (In Russ.)

6. Gorshkov M. K., Tikhonova N. E. Sociocultural factors of consolidation of Russian society. Informatsionno-analiticheskii biulleten Instituta sotsiologii Rossiiskoi akademii nauk, 2013, (1): 1–54. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/puvqpr

7. Guseva A. S. About deformation the moral sphere of convicts for corruption crimes. Applied Legal Psychology, 2023, (4): 127–133. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/voqwez

8. Deyneka O. S., Zabelina E. V., Vinogradov Yu. V. The attitude of Russians to monetary policy before the COVID-19 crisis and on its background. Institute of Psychology Russian Academy of Sciences. Social and Economic Psychology, 2020, 5(2): 189–220. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.38098/ipran.sep.2020.18.2.006

9. Zhuravlev A. L., Kupreychenko A. B. Economic self-determination: Theory and empirical research. Moscow: IP RAS, 2007, 480. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/qctfdj

10. Zhuravlev A. L., Poznyakov V. P. Social psychology and economic reforms in Russia. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal, 2018, 39(1): 15–25. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.7868/S0205959218010026

11. Zhuravleva N. A. Main trends in the dynamics of economic consciousness of Russian entrepreneurs. Science, education, and youth: Development horizons: Proc. II Nation. Sci.-Pract. Conf., Kerch, 19 Mar 2022. Kerch: KSMTU, 2022, 240–246. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/jjwudd

12. Kupreichenko A. B. Moral determination of economic self-determination. Moscow: IP RAS, 2014, 463. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/slajkb

13. Muzdybaev K. Egoism of personality. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal, 2000, 21(2): 27–39. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/mpgecf

14. Nekhorosheva I. V. Features of worldview, happiness and education of a moral person. Human capital, 2024, (6): 127–140. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/jzybgj

15. Non-economic aspects of the economy: Unknown mutual influence: Scientific and journalistic notes of social scientists, ed. Bogomolov O. T. Moscow: InES, 2010, 796. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/rcclbb

16. Rubinshtein S. L. Existence and consciousness. St. Petersburg: Piter, 2012, 287. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/yxelkm

17. Semin A. N., Tretyakov A. P. Trends in the economic policy of modern Russia. Theory and Practice of The World Science, 2020, (8): 2–15. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/unhdln

18. Smirnova N. P., Khashchenko V. A., Khashchenko N. N. Value determinants of personality materialism. Penza Psychological Newsletter, 2022, (2): 3–28. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17689/psy-2022.2.1

19. Strizhov E. Yu. Moral and legal reliability of personality: Socio-psychological aspects. Tambov: Derzhavin TSU, 2009, 527. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/qxzwej

20. Sychev O. A., Belousov K. I., Protasova I. N. Values and moral foundations as a basis for the socio-political views of youth. Sibirskiy Psikhologicheskiy Zhurnal, 2019, (73): 60–77. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17223/17267080/73/4

21. Sychev O. A., Nestik T. A. Moral foundations as factors of socio-economic expectations of Russians. Social Psychology and Society, 2023, 14(4): 135–155. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17759/sps.2023140409

22. Khashchenko V. A. Subjective economic well-being and its measurement: Constructing and validating a questionnaire. Experimental Psychology (Russia), 2011, 4(1): 106–127. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/ndgdkt

23. Khubiev K. A. Trends and prospects of contemporary economic development: An integrative trend? Galbraith: Return, ed. Bodrunov S. D. Moscow: Kulturnaia revolutsiia, 2017, 114–156. (In Russ.)

24. Tsagolov G. N. Galbraith’s revolution and the development of convergence theory. Galbraith: Return, ed. Bodrunov S. D. Moscow: Kulturnaia revolutsiia, 2017, 82–113. (In Russ.)

25. Economy and social environment: Insufficiently realized mutual influence. Scientific notes and essays, ed. Bogomolov O. T. Moscow: InES, 2008, 440. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/supymf

26. Yurevich A. V. "Asocial socialization" as the basis for the moral degradation of society. Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 2011, 81(1): 1–7. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/nuifip

27. Yurevich A. V. Empirical estimates of modern Russian society's morals. Yaroslavl Pedagogical Bulletin, 2018, (4): 168–179. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24411/1813-145X-2018-10111

28. Elbæk C. T., Mitkidis P., Aarøe L., Otterbring T. Subjective socioeconomic status and income inequality are associated with self-reported morality across 67 countries. Nature Communications, 2023, 14. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-41007-0

29. Huang F., Li S., Ding H., Han N., Zhu T. Does more moral equal less corruption? The different mediation of moral foundations between economic growth and corruption in China. Current Psychology, 2023, 42: 26125–26137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-03735-2

30. Kirkland K., Crimston C. R., Jetten J., Amiot C., Baguma P., Barry O. et al. Moral expansiveness around the world: The role of societal factors across 36 countries. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2023, 14(3): 305–318. https://hal.science/hal-03846941v1

31. Kirkland K., Van Lange P. A. M., Gorenz D., Blake K., Amiot C. E., Ausmees L. et al. High economic inequality is linked to greater moralization. PNAS Nexus, 2024, 3(7). https://doi.org/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae221

32. Scatolon A., Paladino M. P. Reducing economic inequality is ‘just right’: Moral conviction predicts support for redistributive government policies. British Journal of Social Psychology, 2023, 62(2): 1076–1096. https://elibrary.ru/tkgzhc

33. Sychev O. A., Protasova I. N. The relationships between moral foundations, social beliefs and attitudes towards economic inequality among Russian youth: A case study of Altai Krai. RUDN Journal of Psychology and Pedagogic, 2020, 17(4): 705–718. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-1683-2020-17-4-705-718

34. Changhao Huang. A review of the impact of social class and economic inequality on prosocial behavior. Advances in Psychology, 2023, 13(2): 540–544. (In Chin.) https://doi.org/10.12677/ap.2023.132067


Review

For citations:


Nekhorosheva I.V., Kramarenko N.S. Effect of Egoism on Economic Consciousness. SibScript. 2026;28(2):279-292. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21603/sibscript-2026-28-2-279-292. EDN: FMNXLB

Views: 127

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2949-2122 (Print)
ISSN 2949-2092 (Online)