Влияние типа цифрового устройства на продуктивность и стратегии решения творческих задач: систематический обзор исследований

В условиях цифровой трансформации образовательной и профессиональной среды тип используемого цифрового устройства становится значимым фактором, влияющим на продуктивность и стратегии решения творческих задач. Несмотря на активное развитие эмпирических исследований в области цифровой креативности, данные о дифференцированном влиянии различных типов устройств на творческую деятельность остаются фрагментарными и требуют систематизации в рамках психо­ логопедагогического подхода. Цель – провести систематический анализ современных эмпирических данных о влиянии типа цифрового устройства на продуктивность и стратегии решения творческих задач, а также выявить закономерности между характеристиками устройств и продуктивностью решения творческих задач. Методологическую основу работы составляет систематический обзор отечественных и зарубежных публикаций, охватывающих период 2000–2025 гг. В анализ включены исследования, посвященные использованию мобильных телефонов, планшетных компьютеров, стационарных компьютеров и ноутбуков, устройств виртуальной и дополненной реальности. Продуктивность творческой деятельности в рамках данной статьи рассматривается как комплексный показатель, включающий количественные характеристики результативности, качественные параметры творческого продукта и показатели когнитивной устойчивости. Результаты анализа позволили установить, что различные типы цифровых устройств формируют специфические условия когнитивной деятельности и по-разному конфигурируют стратегии решения творческих задач. Сделан вывод о контекстно зависимом характере влияния цифровых устройств и необходимости разработки интегративных психолого-педагогических моделей взаимодействия пользователь – устройство – творческая задача.

1. Al-Rqaibat S., Al-Nusair S., Bataineh R. Enhancing architectural education through hybrid digital tools: Investigating the impact on design creativity and cognitive processes. Smart Learning Environments, 2025, 12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-025-00370-9

2. Amabile T. M. Creativity in context: Update to the social psychology of creativity. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1996, 317.

3. Amabile T. M. The social psychology of creativity. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1983, 245.

4. Andrews K., Endert A., North C. Space to think: Large high-resolution displays for sensemaking. CHI '10: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Atlanta, Georgia, 10–15 Apr 2010. New York: Association for Computing Machinery, 2010, 55–64. https://doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753336

5. Antonczak L., Burger-Helmchen T. Creativity on the move: Nexus of technology, slack and social complexities. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 2022, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc8020064

6. Araiza-Alba P., Keane T., Chen W. S., Kaufman J. Immersive virtual reality as a tool to learn problem-solving skills. Computers & Education, 2020, 164: 1–33. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/q857x

7. Arifin A. H., Fitriyani F., Matriadi F., Nurainun N. The influence of creative self-efficacy on employee performance through innovative work behavior as mediating and digital literacy as moderating. International Journal of Social Science and Human Research, 2024, 07(01). https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v7-i01-04

8. Aru J., Rozgonjuk D. The effect of smartphone use on mental effort, learning, and creativity. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2022, 26(10): 821–823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2022.07.002

9. Barreda-Coaquira A., Chata-Condori S., Malaga-Pinto G. L., Flores M. M. M., Sanga G. L. L. Integración de aplicaciones digitales y suefecto en la expresión creativa enestudiantes de artes visuales. Revista Minerva, 2025, 6(17): 82–92. https://doi.org/10.47460/minerva.v6i17.197

10. Behnamnia N., Kamsin A., Akmar M., Ismail B., Hayati A. The effective components of creativity in digital game-based learning among young children: A case study. Children and Youth Services Review, 2020, 116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105227

11. Benedek M., Beaty R., Jauk E., Koschutnig K., Fink A., Silvia P. J., Dunst B., Neubauer A. C. Creating metaphors: The neural basis of figurative language production. NeuroImage, 2014, 90(100): 99–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.12.046

12. Bereczki E. O., Kárpáti A. Technology-enhanced creativity: A multiple case study of digital technology-integration expert teachers' beliefs and practices. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 2021, 39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100791

13. Bitu F., Galinon-Mélénec B., Molina M. Modifying sensory afferences on tablet changes originality in drawings. Frontiers in Psychology, 2022, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.806093

14. Bonnardel N., Zenasni F. The impact of technology on creativity in design: An enhancement? Creativity and Innovation Management, 2010, 19(2): 180–191. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2010.00560.x

15. Bourgeois-Bougrine S., Bonnardel N., Burkhardt J.-M., Thornhill-Miller B., Pahlavan F., Buisine S., Guegan J., Pichot N., Lubart T. Immersive virtual environments' impact on individual and collective creativity. European Psychologist, 2022, 27(4). https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000481

16. Bunjak A., Černe M., Popovič A. Absorbed in technology but digitally overloaded: Interplay effects on gig workers' burnout and creativity. Information & Management, 2021, 58(8). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2021.103533

17. Carr N. G. The shallows: What the Internet is doing to our brains. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 2010, 158.

18. Chang Y.-S., Kao J.-Y., Wang Y.-Y. Influences of virtual reality on design creativity and design thinking. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 2022, 46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101127

19. Chen S.-J., Chen C.-Q., Shan X.-F. The effects of an immersive virtual-reality-based 3D modeling approach on the creativity and problem-solving tendency of elementary school students. Sustainability, 2024, 16(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/su16104092

20. Chen Y., Ding Z. Effects of digitalization in preschool education on the creative and cognitive development of children. Education and Information Technologies, 2024, 29: 21567–21591. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12730-y

21. Chen Y.-C., Chang Y.-S., Chuang M.-J. Virtual reality application influences cognitive load-mediated creativity components and creative performance in engineering design. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 2022, 38(1): 6–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12588

22. Cheng L., Xie H. Smartphone addiction and creativity in Chinese undergraduates: A moderated mediation model analysis. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 2025, 16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1570547

23. Choi S., Lee O.-K. D., Suh W., Lim K. H. Unveiling the underlying cognitive processes of creative idea generation using mobile collaboration platforms. Information & Management, 2023, 60(8). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2023.103874

24. Clark A. Supersizing the mind: Embodiment, action, and cognitive extension. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008, 317.

25. Cristia J., Ibarrarán P., Cueto S., Santiago A., Severín E. Technology and child development: Evidence from the one laptop per child program. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 2017, 9(3): 295–320. https://doi.org/10.1257/app.20150385

26. Csikszentmihalyi M. Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York: HarperCollins, 1996, 456.

27. Czerwinski M., Smith G., Regan T., Meyers B., Robertson G. G., Starkweather G. Toward characterizing the productivity benefits of very large displays. Human-Computer Interaction INTERACT '03: IFIP TC13 International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, Zurich, 1–5 Sep 2003. IOS Press, 2003, 9–16. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/221054378_Toward_Characterizing_the_Productivity_Benefits_of_Very_Large_Displays (accessed 1 Dec 2025).

28. Das M., Meza J., Xu C., Yang M. C. Concept chaining patterns during ideation using digital tablets. Journal of Mechanical Design, 2025, 148(3): 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4068983

29. Domanchin M., Silseth K., Arnseth H. C., Steier R. Collaborative learning with tablets: Analysing students' meaning making of 3D body models in upper secondary education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 2025, 57(2): 482–507. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.70019

30. Dourish P. The stuff of bits: An essay on the materialities of information. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2017, 256. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/10999.001.0001

31. Dourish P. Where the action is: The foundations of embodied interaction. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2001, 233. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/7221.001.0001

32. Duke É., Montag C. Smartphone addiction, daily interruptions and self-reported productivity. Addictive Behaviors Reports, 2017, 6: 90–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.abrep.2017.07.002

33. Dzikri A. S., Sa'diyah S., Afriani G. Fostering creativity through technology-enhanced learning environments. Global Education Journal, 2025, 3(2): 455–462. https://elibrary.ru/zbtagy

34. Evans M., Aldoy N. Digital design sketching using the tablet PC. The Design Journal, 2016, 19(5): 763–787. https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2016.1196091

35. Fadillah M. A., Siregar F. A. Augmented and virtual reality in computational thinking: A systematic review of their individual impacts, advantages, challenges, and future directions. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 2025, 22(3): 160–174. https://doi.org/10.34190/ejel.22.3.3992

36. Fielding K., Murcia K. Research linking digital technologies to young children’s creativity: An interpretive framework and systematic review. Issues in Educational Research, 2022, 32(1): 105–125. URL: https://www.iier.org.au/iier32/fielding.pdf (accessed 1 Dec 2025).

37. Frich J., Biskjaer M. M., Vermeulen L. M., Remy C., Dalsgaard P. Strategies in creative professionals’ use of digital tools across domains. C&C '19: Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Creativity and Cognition, San Diego, CA, USA, 23–26 Jun 2019. New York: Association for Computing Machinery, 2019, 210–221. https://doi.org/10.1145/3325480.3325494

38. Gerlich M. AI Tools in society: Impacts on cognitive offloading and the future of critical thinking. Societies, 2025, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/soc15010006

39. Glăveanu V. P., Kaufman J. C. The creativity matrix: Spotlights and blind spots in our understanding of the phenomenon. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 2020, 54(4): 884–896. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.417

40. Gong Z., Gonçalves M., Nanjappan V., Georgiev G. V. Priming uncertainty avoidance values: Influence of virtual reality stimuli on design creativity in ideation. Computers in Human Behavior, 2024, 158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2024.108257

41. Grech A., Mehnen J., Wodehouse A. An extended AI-Experience: Industry 5.0 in creative product innovation. Sensors, 2023, 23(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/s23063009

42. Guan J., Yang Y., Ma W., Li G., Liu C. The relationship between mobile phone use and creative ideation among college students: The roles of critical thinking and creative self-efficacy. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000695

43. Guilford J. P. The structure of intellect. Psychological Bulletin, 1956, 53(4): 267–293. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040755

44. Guo J., Song X., Li G., Wen G. The impact of smartphone addiction on creativity among college students: A moderated mediation model of negative emotion and perceived social support. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 2025, 16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1567285

45. Hoober S., Berkman E. Designing mobile interfaces: Patterns for interaction design. Sebastopol: O'Reilly Media, 2011, 584.

46. Huang H.-T., Chang Y.-S. Effects of virtual reality on creative performance and emotions: A study of brainwaves. Computers in Human Behavior, 2023, 146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2023.107815

47. Huovinen E., Rautanen H. Interaction affordances in traditional instruments and tablet computers: A study of children's musical group creativity. Research Studies in Music Education, 2020, 42(1): 94–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/1321103X18809510

48. Hutchins E. Cognition in the wild. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1995, 381.

49. Ichimura K. Effects of virtual reality's viewing medium and the environment's spatial openness on divergent thinking. PLOS ONE, 2023, 18(3). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0283632

50. Jung R. E., Mead B. S., Carrasco J., Flores R. A. The structure of creative cognition in the human brain. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 2013, 7: 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00330

51. Kahneman D. Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1973, 246.

52. Kaplan O., Kara M., Kaçar T. The effect of digital technology integration on students’ creative thinking skills: PISA evidence using propensity score matching. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 2025, 83(3): 403–423. https://doi.org/10.33225/pec/25.83.403

53. Kim H. J., Park J. H., Yoo S., Kim H. Fostering creativity in tablet-based interactive classrooms. Educational Technology & Society, 2016, 19(3): 207–220. URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.19.3.207 (accessed 1 Dec 2025).

54. Kim H.-S., Kim H., Yoon I., Jung C.-H., Lee Y. H. User performance differences between graphics tablet and mouse in graphic applications: Focus on controllability and accuracy. International Journal of Multimedia and Ubiquitous Engineering, 2015, 10(9): 167–174. https://doi.org/10.14257/ijmue.2015.10.9.18

55. Kühnel J., Vahle-Hinz T., de Bloom J., Syrek C. J. Staying in touch while at work: Relationships between personal social media use at work, work-nonwork balance and creativity. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 2020, 31(10): 1235–1261. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2017.1396551

56. Kyobe R., Roodt S., Mulaji S. M. The impact of smartphones on student creativity at a south African university. International Conference on Intelligent and Innovative Computing Applications, 2022, 200–212. https://doi.org/10.59200/iconic.2022.022

57. Li W., Liu J., Liu X., Ge Y., Wang Y., Zhang A. The association between smartphone addiction and creativity in Chinese college students: The chain mediating effects of depression and executive function. BMC Psychiatry, 2025, 25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-025-07378-y

58. Li X., Li Y., Wang X., Hu W. Reduced brain activity and functional connectivity during creative idea generation in individuals with smartphone addiction. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 2022, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsac052

59. Liebherr M., Schubert P., Antons S., Montag C., Brand M. Smartphones and attention, curse or blessing? – A review on the effects of smartphone usage on attention, inhibition, and working memory. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 2020, 1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2020.100005

60. Lin Y.-J., Wang H. Using virtual reality to facilitate learners' creative self-efficacy and intrinsic motivation in an EFL classroom. Education and Information Technologies, 2021, 26: 4487–4505. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10472-9

61. Linares C., Sellier A.-L. How bad is the mere presence of a phone? A replication of Przybylski and Weinstein (2013) and an extension to creativity. PLOS ONE, 2021, 16(6). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0251451

62. Liu J., Riesch S., Tien J., Lipman T., Pinto-Martin J., O’Sullivan A. Screen media overuse and associated physical, cognitive, and emotional / behavioral outcomes in children and adolescents: An integrative review. Journal of Pediatric Health Care, 2021, 36(2): 99–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedhc.2021.06.003

63. Liu M., Pang W., Guo J., Zhang Y. A meta-analysis of the effect of multimedia technology on creative performance. Education and Information Technologies, 2022, 27: 8603–8630. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-10981-1

64. Lu J., Luo T., Zhang M., Shen Y., Zhao P., Cai N., Yang X., Pan Z., Stephens M. Examining the impact of VR and MR on future teachers' creativity performance and influencing factors by scene expansion in instruction designs. Virtual Reality, 2022, 26: 1615–1636. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-022-00652-4

65. Mueller P. A., Oppenheimer D. M. The pen is mightier than the keyboard: Advantages of longhand over laptop note taking. Psychological Science, 2014, 25(6): 1159–1168. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614524581

66. Müller M., Montag C. Disentangling the link between creativity and technology use: Individual differences in smartphone and social media (over)use. Journal of Creativity, 2024, 34(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yjoc.2024.100081

67. Nguyen M.-H., Jin R., Hoang G., Nguyen M.-H. T., Nguyen P.-L., Le T.-T., La V.-P., Vuong Q.-H. Examining contributors to Vietnamese high school students’ digital creativity under the serendipity-mindsponge-3D knowledge management framework. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 2023, 49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101350

68. Nielsen J., Budiu R. Mobile usability. Berkeley, CA: New Riders, 2012, 216.

69. Norman D. A. The design of everyday things. Revised and expanded edition. New York: Basic Books, 2013, 368.

70. O’Byrne W. I., Radakovic N., Hunter-Doniger T., Fox M., Kern R., Parnell S. Designing spaces for creativity and divergent thinking: Pre-service teachers creating stop motion animation on tablets. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology (IJEMST), 2018, 6(2): 182–199. https://doi.org/10.18404/ijemst.408942

71. Obeid S., Demirkan H. The influence of virtual reality on design process creativity in basic design studios. Interactive Learning Environments, 2020, 31(4): 1841–1859. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1858116

72. Oldham G. R., Silva N. D. The impact of digital technology on the generation and implementation of creative ideas in the workplace. Computers in Human Behavior, 2015, 42: 5–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.10.041

73. Olson J. A., Sandra D. A., Langer E. J., Raz A., Veissière S. P. L. Creativity and smartphone use: Three correlational studies. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 2022, 39(14): 2920–2925. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2022.2088451

74. Oulasvirta A. The fragmentation of attention in mobile interaction, and what to do with it. Interactions, 2005, 12(6): 16–18. https://doi.org/10.1145/1096554.1096555

75. Oulasvirta A., Rattenbury T., Ma L., Raita E. Habits make smartphone use more pervasive. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 2012, 16(1): 105–114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-011-0412-2

76. Papanastasiou G., Drigas A., Skianis C., Lytras M., Papanastasiou E. Virtual and augmented reality effects on K-12, higher and tertiary education students' twenty-first century skills. Virtual Reality, 2018, 23: 425–436. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-018-0363-2

77. Parasuraman A. Technology Readiness Index (TRI): A multiple-item scale to measure readiness to embrace new technologies. Journal of Service Research, 2000, 2(4): 307–320. https://doi.org/10.1177/109467050024001

78. Peng Q., Ma Y., Zhang L., Zhou R. The impact of brain science literacy on creative thinking: A meta-analytic study. Frontiers in Education, 2025, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1637506

79. Plaisant C., Shneiderman B., Cohen M., Jacobs S. Designing the user interface: Strategies for effective human-computer interaction. 6th ed. Harlow: Pearson, 2016, 616.

80. Puente-Díaz R. Creative self-efficacy: An exploration of its antecedents, consequences, and applied implications. The Journal of Psychology, 2016, 150(2): 175–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.2015.1051498

81. Rhodes M. An analysis of creativity. The Phi Delta Kappan, 1961, 42(7): 305–310. URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/20342603 (accessed 1 Dec 2025).

82. Rodríguez F. M. M., Lozano J. M. G., Mingorance P. L., Pérez-Mármol J. M. Influence of smartphone use on emotional, cognitive and educational dimensions in university students. Sustainability, 2020, 12(16). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12166646

83. Rong Q., Lian Q., Tang T. Research on the Influence of AI and VR technology for students' concentration and creativity. Frontiers in Psychology, 2022, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.767689

84. Runco M. A. A hierarchical framework for the study of creativity. New Horizons in Education, 2007, 55(3): 1–9. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228643794_A_hierarchical_framework_for_the_study_of_creativity (accessed 1 Dec 2025).

85. Said-Metwaly S., Van den Noortgate W., Kyndt E. Approaches to measuring creativity: A systematic literature review. Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 2017, 4(2): 238–275. https://doi.org/10.1515/ctra-2017-0013

86. Sakr M. Young children drawing together on the iPad versus paper: How collaborative creativity is shaped by different semiotic resources. International Journal of Education and the Arts, 2019, 20(20): 1–26. http://doi.org/10.26209/ijea20n20

87. Samper-Márquez J. J., Oropesa-Ruiz N. F. Scoping review on digital creativity: Definition, approaches, and current trends. Education Sciences, 2025, 15(2). http://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15020202

88. Santoso H., Elidjen E., Abdinagoro S. B., Arief M. The role of creative self-efficacy, transformational leadership, and digital literacy in supporting performance through innovative work behavior: Evidence from telecommunications industry. Management Science Letters, 2019, 9: 2305–2314. http://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2019.7.024

89. Schäfer J., Reuter T., Leuchter M., Karbach J. Validation of new tablet-based problem-solving tasks in primary school students. PLOS ONE, 2024, 19(8). http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0309718

90. Shao Z., Li X., Wang Q. From ambidextrous learning to digital creativity: An integrative theoretical framework. Information Systems Journal, 2021, 32(3): 544–572. http://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12361

91. Sidiq A., Sa'diyah D., Afriani G. Fostering creativity through technology-enhanced learning environments. Global Education Journal, 2025, 3(2): 455–462. URL: https://www.rstjournal.com/?mdocs-file=2732 (accessed 1 Dec 2025).

92. Sookkaew J., Chaikaew N., Chaikaew N. A comprehensive analysis of smartphones and tablets in graphic design and digital art. Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, 2025, 40(1): 146–155. http://doi.org/10.11591/ijeecs.v40.i1.pp146-155

93. Sternberg R. J., Karami S. An 8P theoretical framework for understanding creativity and theories of creativity. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 2022, 56(1): 55–78. http://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.516

94. Sun M., Wang M., Wegerif R. Using computer-based cognitive mapping to improve students' divergent thinking for creativity development. British Journal of Educational Technology, 2019, 50(5): 2217–2233. http://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12825

95. Sun T. Y., Yoon M. K. The impact of digital transformation on faculty performance in higher education: The mediating role of digital self-efficacy and the moderating role of task-technology fit. Frontiers in Psychology, 2025, 16. http://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1693375

96. Tan Ai Lin D., Ganapathy M., Kaur M. Kahoot! It: Gamification in higher education. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 2018, 26(1): 565–582. URL: http://www.pertanika.upm.edu.my/resources/files/Pertanika%20PAPERS/JSSH%20Vol.%2026%20(1)%20Mar.%202018/34%20JSSH-2477-2017-3rdProof.pdf (accessed 1 Dec 2025).

97. Tang C., Mao S., Naumann S. E., Xing Z. Improving student creativity through digital technology products: A literature review. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 2022, 44. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101032

98. Tang K.-S., Murcia K., Brown J., Cross E., Mennell S., Seitz J., Phillips S. R. P., Sabatino D. Exploring the multimodal affordances of digital coding devices in fostering creative thinking in early childhood education. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 2024, 53. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101602

99. Tao R., Zhang H., Geng L., Li Y., Qiu J. The influence of trait and state creative self-efficacy on creative behavior: An Experimental study using false feedback. Behavioral Sciences, 2025, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15010018

100. Tierney P., Farmer S. M. Creative self-efficacy: Its potential antecedents and relationship to creative performance. Academy of Management Journal, 2002, 45(6): 1137–1148. URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/3069429 (accessed 1 Dec 2025).

101. Torrance E. P. Torrance tests of creative thinking. Directions manual and scoring guide. Figural tests, booklet A and B. Bensenville, IL: Scholastic Testing Service, 1974, 48.

102. Torrance E. P. Torrance tests of creative thinking: Norms technical manual. Princeton, NJ: Personnel Press, 1966, 95.

103. Tu Y., Wang S., Lu L. Dual pathways from the use of digital technologies to employee creativity: The moderating role of mindfulness. Frontiers in Psychology, 2025, 16. http://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1678376

104. Turkle S. Alone together: Why we expect more from technology and less from each other. New York: Basic Books, 2011, 384.

105. Upshaw J. D., Davis W. M., Zabelina D. L. iCreate: Social media use, divergent thinking, and real-life creative achievement. Translational Issues in Psychological Science, 2022, 8(1): 125–136. http://doi.org/10.1037/tps0000306

106. Van Diemen T., Craig A., Van Nes I. J. W., Stolwijk-Swuste J. M., Geertzen J. H. B., Middleton J., Post M. W. M. Enhancing our conceptual understanding of state and trait self-efficacy by correlational analysis of four self-efficacy scales in people with spinal cord injury. BMC Psychology, 2020, 8. http://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-020-00474-6

107. Viviani L., Liso A., Craighero L. Mobile typing as a window into sensorimotor and cognitive function. Brain Sciences, 2025, 15(10). http://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci15101084

108. Wang B., Li P. Digital creativity in STEM education: The impact of digital tools and pedagogical learning models on the students’ creative thinking skills development. Interactive Learning Environments, 2024, 32(6): 2633–2646. http://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2155839

109. Wang Q., Xiao H., Yin H., Wei J., Li S., Shi B. The different relationships between mobile phone dependence and adolescents' scientific and artistic creativity: Self esteem and creative identity as mediators. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 2025, 59(2): 1–18. http://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.70024

110. Wang Y.-Y., Weng T.-H., Tsai I.-F., Kao J.-Y., Chang Y.-S. Effects of virtual reality on creativity performance and perceived immersion: A study of brain waves. British Journal of Educational Technology, 2022, 54(2): 581–602. http://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13264

111. Ward A. F., Duke K., Gneezy A., Bos M. W. Brain Drain: The mere presence of one’s own smartphone reduces available cognitive capacity. Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, 2017, 2(2). http://doi.org/10.1086/691462

112. Yang M., Talha M., Zhang S., Zhang Y. Exploring the mechanisms linking digital leadership to employee creativity: A moderated mediation model. Behavioral Sciences, 2025, 15(8). http://doi.org/10.3390/bs15081024

113. Yang X., Lin L., Cheng P.-Y., Yang X., Ren Y., Huang Y.-M. Examining creativity through a virtual reality support system. Educational Technology Research and Development, 2018, 66: 1231–1254. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-018-9604-z

114. Yang Y., Dwyer T., Swiecki Z., Lee B., Wybrow M., Cordeil M., Wulandari T., Thomas B. H., Billinghurst M. Desktop versus VR for collaborative sensemaking. Frontiers in Virtual Reality, 2025, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/frvir.2025.1570383

115. Yu H., Wang J. Enhancing college students' creativity through virtual reality technology: A systematic literature review. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 2025, 12(1). http://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-05044-y

116. Yusuf O. M., Lawal B. I., Oyewusi M. B. Effectiveness of using mobile technologies in teaching and learning. Promoting active learning through the integration of mobile and ubiquitous technologies, ed. Keengwe J. Hershey, Pennsylvania, 2015, 155–166. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-6343-5.ch009

117. Zaremohzzabieh Z., Ahrari S., Abdullah R., Abdullah H. Effects of educational technology intervention on creative thinking in educational settings: A meta-analysis. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 2025, 22(2): 235–265. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-11-2023-0224

118. Zhou F., Mou J., Wang W., Wu Y. J. Social media usage and employee creativity: Is relational energy a missing link? Online Information Review, 2022, 46(6): 1034–1053. http://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-02-2021-0119