Reconstructing Linguistic Worldview from Lexical-Semantic Noun Groups in Russian Textbook Exercises

Worldview linguistics extracts lexical-semantic vocabulary from a limited corpus of texts. Such studies were especially popular at the beginning of the 21st century. This approach relied on the presumption that the linguistic worldview is formed primarily by the vocabulary, which is a system of interconnected topics. This research featured lexical-semantic groups of nouns used in exercises from Russian textbooks. It offers a new perspective on the cultural code, where codes are based on texts rather than dictionary entries or phraseological units. The research relied on the anthropological paradigm, consistent with systemic-structural linguistics. For the first time, exercises in Russian textbooks were examined in terms of their axiological potential. The exercises came from three of the most popular modern Russian textbooks for high schools. The author extracted 10,373 word forms, which corresponded to 4,455 lexical-semantic variants of meaning. The lexical-semantic forms, not words, were chosen as research units because the meanings of a polysemantic word can be attributed to various lexical-semantic groups. Based on the quantitative analysis, a lexical-semantic group is an important fragment of the linguistic worldview. Such fragments can be reconstructed from text corpora if the elements of the lexicalsemantic group possess axiological potential, provide synonymous series, and represent cultural codes. In this research, the linguistic worldview reconstructed from Russian textbook consisted of lexical-semantic groups that reflected verbal, temporal, anthropic, and bodily codes of culture. 

1. Annushkin V. I. Language-speech-word concepts in Russian philology: History and modernity. Lingvoritoricheskaia paradigma: teoreticheskie i prikladnye aspekty, 2021, (26-1): 7–21. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/vgutqv

2. Boldyrev N. N. Knowledge representation in the system of language. Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki, 2007, (4): 7–27. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/iiqypd

3. Wierzbicka A. Understanding cultures through their key words. Moscow: IaSK, 2001, 288. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/sumhvv

4. Gromenko M. V. On the implementation of the concepts of "glaz" (eve) and "brov" (eyebrow) in Russian folklore. Mezhdunarodnyi nauchno-issledovatelskii zhurnal, 2021, (11-4): 149–152. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/nzstaa

5. Gudkov D. B. Russian cultural codes: Problems of description. Mir russkogo slova, 2005, (1-2): 25–30. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/jlbxdq

6. Humboldt W. von. On the difference in the structure of human languages and its influence on the spiritual development of the human race: Extracts. In: Zvegintsev V. A. History of linguistics of the XIX–XX centuries in essays and extracts. Moscow: Prosveshchenie, 1964, pt. 1, 85–105. (In Russ.)

7. Dymarsky M. Ya. Problems of text formation and the literary text in the Russian prose of the 19th–20th centuries. St. Petersburg: SPbSU, 1999, 281. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/sixjlf

8. Zamanova I. V. 'Heart' as a universal mental concept (a case study of Chinese and Russian language worldviews). Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Rossiyskaya i zarubezhnaya filologiya, 2024, 16(1): 13–24. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17072/2073-6681-2024-1-13-24

9. Ivanov V. V., Lotman Yu. M., Pyatigorskiy A. M., Toporov V. N., Uspenskiy B. A. Theses of the semiotic study of cultures (as applied to Slavic texts). In: Lotman Yu. M. Semiosphere. St. Petersburg: Iskusstvo-SPB, 2000, 504–524. (In Russ.)

10. Lotman Yu. M. Metalanguage of typological descriptions of culture. In: Lotman Yu. M. Semiosphere. St. Petersburg: Iskusstvo-SPB, 2000, 462–484. (In Russ.)

11. Karasik V. I. Language circle: Personality, concepts, discourse. Moscow: Gnozis, 2004, 389. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/qqwtkl

12. Kishlakova N. M. Language as an ethnonational value in the global world. Problems of language in the global world, eds. Ganina E. V., Chumakov A. N. Moscow: Prospekt, 2017, 158–168. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/uckddk

13. Koltzova O. V. Lexical-semantic group as descriptive unit in the language world picture. Izvestiya of Saratov University. Sociology. Politology, 2010, 10(1): 66–72. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/lmckat

14. Kornilov O. A. Language pictures of the world as derivatives of national mentalities. 2nd ed. Moscow: CheRo, 2003, 349. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/qqnydr

15. Krasnykh V. V. Dictionary and grammar of linguistic culture: Fundamentals of psycholinguistic culturology. Moscow: Gnozis, 2016, 496. (In Russ.)

16. Maslova V. A. Language code as a space for culture realization. Communicative strategies: Proc. 11th Intern. Sci. Conf., Minsk, 24 Nov 2021. Minsk: MSLU, 2022, 99–102. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/kbopqw

17. Myaksheva O. V. "Augmentation" or creation of the meaning in the text (on the material of pronouns functioning in texts of the same author). Ekologiia iazyka i kommunikativnaia praktika, 2015, (2): 287–302. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/vehwqt

18. Myaksheva O. V. Spatial semantics: Implementing language resources in different spheres and media of communication. Saratov: SarSU, 2007, 355. (In Russ.)

19. Myaksheva O. V., Surkova M. V. The image of Russia in Russian language textbooks. Zanry Reci, 2023, 18(3): 245–251. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18500/2311-0740-2023-18-3-39-245-251

20. Prikhoda E. A. The concept of "time" in polychronous linguoculture. Language and culture: A young look: Proc. IV Intern. Sci. Student Conf., Moscow, 26 May 2021. Moscow: Pushkin Institute, 2021, 414–419. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/twbice

21. Sarkisova A. Yu. Synonymic opposition as a means of axiological actualization of nationally significant concepts of the Russian language picture of the world. Vestnik of the Mari State University, 2020, 14(2): 209–215. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30914/2072-6783-2020-14-2-209-215

22. Simbirtseva N. A. "Culture code" as a category of culturology. Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie, 2016, (1): 157–167. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17805/zpu.2016.1.12

23. Stepanov Yu. S. Constants: Dictionary of Russian culture. 2nd ed. Moscow: Akad. proekt, 2001, 990. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/qofiub

24. Teliya V. N. Priority tasks and methodological problems of researching the phraseological composition of language in the context of culture. Phraseology in the context of culture, ed. Teliya V. N. Moscow: IaRK, 1999, 13–24. (In Russ.)

25. Filin F. P. Lexical-semantic groups of words. Linguistic study in honor of academician St. Mladenov. Sofia: Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 1957, 537–538. (In Russ.)

26. Tsivileva A. V. Functions of lexical semantic groups’ components as a means of world’s language map reconstruction. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 2. Yazykoznanie, 2008, (2): 52–57. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/kuvtpj

27. Chernyak V. D. The dynamic of synonymic groups: Going down. Vestnik Novosibirskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta, 2015, (5): 47–55. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15293/2226-3365.1505.04

28. Sharafutdinova L. F. As to the problem of the metalanguage describing substantial language and culture units. Vestnik Rossiyskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta im. I. Kanta, 2010, (2): 84–87. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/ldepbp

29. Shmelev A. D. Russian language model of the world: Materials for the dictionary. Moscow: IaSK, 2002, 224. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/qskolp