Russian Historical Science in the First Quarter of the 18th Century: Prince Dimitrie Cantemir
https://doi.org/10.21603/sibscript-2025-27-6-1053-1064
Abstract
Prince Dimitrie Cantemir contributed to the formation of Russian historical science in the first quarter of the 18th century. His works reflected the scientific thought typical of the Early Enlightenment. Prince Cantemir’s philosophical views relied on Orthodox Christianity rather than on the Medieval providentialism and supernaturalism. Providentialism manifested itself in his Theory of Four Monarchies, i.e., global history as a sequence of four superpowers. He believed Russia to be the fourth and last monarchy, the new center of world history. Prince Cantemir explained it with its geographical location, natural resources, socio-economic development, a complex motivation of individual stakeholders, and the divine influence acting through individuals. As a devoted supporter of absolutism, he described the rulers of Moldavia as powerful defenders from the imminent Ottoman threat. The autocratic power of a just monarch was for him the only possible prerequisite for national prosperity. Prince Dimitrie Cantemir’s legacy provides a good example of the early Russian historical science.
About the Authors
Mikhail Yu. Shlyakhov
Kozma Minin Nizhny Novgorod State Pedagogical University
Russian Federation
Competing Interests:
Russian Federation
Nizhny Novgorod
Scopus Author ID: 57188672186
Competing Interests:
The author declared no potential conflict of interests regarding the research, authorship, and / or publication of this article.
Nina V. Starikova
Kozma Minin Nizhny Novgorod State Pedagogical University
Russian Federation
Competing Interests:
Russian Federation
Nizhny Novgorod
Scopus Author ID: 58934042800
Competing Interests:
The author declared no potential conflict of interests regarding the research, authorship, and / or publication of this article.
References
1. Alpatov M. A. Russian historical thought and Western Europe in the 17th – early 18th century. Moscow: Nauka, 1976, 456. (In Russ.)
2. Babiy A. I. Dimitrie Cantemir. Moscow: Mysl, 1984, 173. (In Russ.)
3. Gusterin V. P. First Russian orientalist Dimitrie Cantemir. Moscow: Vostjchnaia kniga, 2008, 111. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/qpmzlz
4. Ermuratsky V. N. Socio-political views of Dimitrie Cantemir. Chisineu: Gosizdat Moldavii, 1956, 104. (In Russ.)
5. Cantemir D. Selected philosophical works. Chisineu: Cartea Moldovei, 2003, 360. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/qwhfpt
6. Cantemir D. Description of Moldavia: Facsimiles, Latin text, and Russian translation of the Sturdzov Manuscript. St. Petersburg: Nestor-Istoriia, 2011, 434. (In Russ.)
7. Kruglov A. N. The concept of enlightenment in Russian philosophy of the 18th century. Khristianskoye Chteniye, 2023, (1): 225–245. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.47132/1814-5574_2023_1_225
8. Peshtich S. L. Russian historiography of the 18th century. Leningrad: Leningrad University, 1961, pt. 1, 276. (In Russ.)
9. Rubinstein N. L. Russian historiography. St. Petersburg: SPbSU, 2008, 938. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/vmxtut
10. Ryzhenkov M. R. Dimitrie Cantemir and his documentary heritage in the Russian State Archive of Ancient Acts. Oriental Archive, 2012, (1): 6–13. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/paycrl
11. Savina L. V., Romanov A. I. The formation of scientific philosophy in Russia: The "scientific squad" of Peter the Great. Spiritual Arsenal, 2022, (2): 61–68. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/xarowv
12. Sakharov A. M. Historiography of the history of the USSR: Pre-Soviet period. Moscow: Vyssh. shk., 1978, 256. (In Russ.)
13. Skopa V. A. Russian enlightenment and orthodox culture: Dialectics of interaction (based on the materials of the 18th century). Sovremennaia nauka: aktualnye problemy teorii i praktiki. Seriia: Gumanitarnye nauki, 2025, (1): 80–83. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/vqozns
14. Khvataeva N. P. Development "sacredness-morality" concept in Russian pedagogical education of the last century. Vestnik of Minin University, 2024, 12(2): 3–23. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26795/2307-1281-2024-12-2-3
15. Tsvirkun V. I. Dimitrie Cantemir: Pages of life in letters and documents. St. Petersburg: Nestor, 2010, 411. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/qprmyf
16. Tsvirkun V. I. Moldavian ruler Dimitrie Cantemir: State and social activities in the Russian Empire. State and law: evolution, current state, development prospects (to the 300th anniversary of the Russian Empire): Proc. XVIII Intern. Sci. Conf., St. Petersburg, 29–30 Apr 2021. St. Petersburg: St.-Petersburg university of the MIA of Russia, 2021a, pt. 1, 316–328. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/ehllag
17. Tsvirkun V. I. Dimitrie Cantemir and Peter the Great. Evolution of relationships. Stratum Plus. Archaeology and Cultural Anthropology, 2023, (6): 15–26. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.55086/sp2361526
18. Tsvirkun V. I. Political and governmental activities of Dimitrie Cantemir in Russia. Stratum Plus. Archaeology and Cultural Anthropology, 2021b, (5): 423–434. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.55086/sp215423434
19. Zvirkun V. I. Epistolary heritage of Dimitrie Cantemir. Life and fate in letters and papers. Chisineu: Stiinta, 2008, 358. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/qpruzl
20. Cherepnin L. V. Russian historiography before the XIX century. Moscow: MSU, 1957, 306. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/twujek
21. Shapiro A. L. Russian historiography from ancient times to 1917. 2nd ed. Moscow: Kultura, 1993, 761. (In Russ.)
22. Elezovich D. M. The role of Dmitry Cantemir's writings for the Western educational historiography (a case study of the manuscript "The history of Turkey" of the 18th century). Rusin, 2021, (63): 34–42. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17223/18572685/63/3
23. Apostolache I. Orthodoxy and culture, tradition and Romanian spirit over the centuries. Apologetics ideas in the thought of Dmitri Cantemir. Teologia i Czlowiek, 2017, (4): 263–276.
24. Bădărău D. Filozofia lui Dimitrie Cantemir. Bucureşti, 1964, 410.
25. Chiriac А., Celac V. Historical Pre-Modernism and the Entangled Networks of the Enlightenment. Dimitrie Cantemir’s Descriptio Moldaviae During the Long 18th Century and the Beginning of the 19th Century. Philobiblon, 2023, 28(2): 235–248. https://doi.org/10.26424/philobib.2023.28.2.04
26. Dimitrie Cantemir: Fürst der Moldau, Gelehrter, Akteur der europäischen Kulturgeschichte, Hrsg. Bochmann K., Dumbrava V. Leipzig: Leipziger Universitätsverlag, 2008, 312.
27. Esanu S., Еsаnu V. Descrierea Moldovei de Dimitrie Cantemir în cultura europeană. Chisinau, 2004, 595.
28. Feodorov I., Petrova Yu. I., Cândea V. Dimitrie Cantemir, salvation of the sage and ruin of the sinful world. Toronto: Brill, 2016, 516.
29. Joita M. Timp și istorie în opera lui Cantemir: Surse, resurse, ecouri: Un eseu de istoria mentalităților. Craiova: Scrisul Românesc, 2004, 212.
30. Kenny A. The rise of modern philosophy: A new history of Western philosophy. Vol. 3. Great Britain. OUP Oxford, 2006, 376.
31. Leezenberg M. The oriental origins of orientalism: The case of Dimitrie Cantemir. The making of the humanities. Vol. II: From Early Modern to modern disciplines, eds. Bod R., Maat J., Weststeijn T. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 2012, 243–263. https://doi.org/10.26530/OAPEN_429447
32. Panaitescu P. P. Dimitrie Cantemir. Viata si opera. Bucuresti: Academiei, 1958, 707.
33. Popescu-Judetz E. Dimitrie Cantemir. Cartea stiintei muzicii. Bucureşti: Editura muzicală, 1973, 408.
34. Sorohan E. Cantemir în cartea hieroglifelor. Bucuredti: Minerva, 1978, 285.
35. Tarălungă Е. Dimitrie Cantemir. Contribuții documentare lа un portret. Bucuresti, 1989, 423.
Review
For citations:
Shlyakhov M.Yu., Starikova N.V. Russian Historical Science in the First Quarter of the 18th Century: Prince Dimitrie Cantemir. SibScript. 2025;27(6):1053-1064. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21603/sibscript-2025-27-6-1053-1064
Views:
59
Email this article 