Verbal Aggression of Sports Fans as a Response to Provocative Journalistic Texts about Figure Skating

 Linguistic conflictology is a branch of pragmatics that focuses on aggressive speech behavior patterns. This research featured provocative reports about figure skating and online comments as response. This conflictogenic area provides an iconic case study that makes it possible to trace a conflict through all its stages, i.e., origin, course, and escalation. To profile the aggressive online verbal behavior of sports fans, the authors classified their comments by the provocative stimulus and then graded the stimuli by the efficiency of provocation. To establish the speech means and stylistic devices of negative response, they applied multimodal discourse, contextual, and content analyses, as well as the methods of classification and statistics. The resulting classification of aggressive comments depending on the stimulus and its degree of provocativeness was supplemented with a list of linguistic means of negative emotional response. The list of text elements bound to evoke negative comments included: structural components (headlines, leads, images, etc.); semantic blocks about skaters and coaches provided with the author’s subjective assessments; linguistic techniques (generalization, negative intensification, escalation, belittling, etc.); names of the journalist(s) and the media responsible for the publication. 

1. Apresjan V. Yu. Implicit aggression in language. Computational linguistics and intellectual technologies: Proc. Intern. Conf. Dialogue 2003, Protvino, 11–16 Jun 2003. Moscow: Nauka, 2003, 32–35. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/rsnxet

2. Barchenkova Ya. V., Sheiko E. V. Verbal aggressiveness as language phenomenon hindering learning process. Philology. Theory & Practice, 2020, 13(5): 122–125. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30853/filnauki.2020.5.22

3. Basovskaya E. N. Creators of black and white reality: Verbal aggression in mass media. Critique & Semiotics, 2004, (7): 257–263. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/xomcmp

4. Belyutin R. V. Communicative behaviour of German and Russian football fans: Similarities and differences. Proceedings of Voronezh State University. Series: Linguistics and Intercultural Communication, 2013, (1): 196–199. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/qyuliz

5. Volkova Ia. A. Destructive texts in mass media: Identification and parameterization issues. Journal of Siberian Federal University – Humanities and Social Sciences, 2024, 17(5): 938–949. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/odfqeo

6. Vol'skaya N. N. The clickbait as a means of making false information in the Internet communication. Mediascope, 2018, (2). (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30547/mediascope.2.2018.12

7. Vorontsova T. A. Trolling and flaming: Speech aggression in the Internet communication. Vestnik Udmurtskogo universiteta. Seriya: Istoriya i filologiya, 2016, 26(2): 109–116. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/vywtnf

8. Dzyaloshinsky I. M. Manipulative technologies in mass media. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 10. Zhurnalistika, 2005, (1): 29–54. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/jxdhcp

9. Evseeva I. V., Belousova M. V. Conflict discourse behavior in Russian figure skating media text: A double case analysis. Virtual Communication and Social Networks, 2025, 4(1): 71–80. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21603/2782-4799-2025-4-1-71-80

10. Zelianskaia N. L., Belousov K. I., Sychov O. A., Galinskaia T. N. Semantic structure of clickbait headlines and Internet user activities. Medialingvistika, 2023, 10(1): 66–86. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu22.2023.104

11. Issers O. S. Speech influence. Moscow: FLINTA, 2009, 224. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/uurvqp

12. Jorgensen M. V., Phillips L. J. Discourse analysis as theory and method. 2nd ed. Kharkiv: GTs, 2008, 352. (In Russ.)

13. Karaban N. A., Dikareva A. V. Verbal aggression in Internet communication. Philology: Scientific researches, 2018, (2): 1–8. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.7256/2454-0749.2018.2.25581

14. Kateneva I. G. Manipulations in mass media texts as an effective tool of political impact and social control (based on the material of the election campaign of 2011). Vestnik Novosibirskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta, Seriya: Istoriya, Filologiya, 2012, 11(6): 89–94. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/ozejzr

15. Kopylova Yu. V, Lyapun S. V., Shkhumishkhova A. R. Author's category and media style in the sport analytical journalism. Sovremennyi uchenyi, 2021, (6): 88–92. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/bqddmb

16. Lutsenko T. S. Vulgarization of speech as a negative tendency in sports media (based on the materials of the sports media ‘Sovetskiy Sport’ and ‘Sport-Express’). Mediaissledovaniia, 2017, (4-2): 167–171. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/zezimf

17. Malysheva E. G., Rogaleva O. S. Communicative dominants of the sports Internet discourse on figure skating. Philology. Theory & Practice, 2024, 17(9): 3071–3078. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30853/phil20240435

18. Malysheva E. G., Rogaleva O. S. New genres and formats in modern sports Internet-discourse on figure skating. Communication studies, 2021, 8(2): 351–367. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24147/2413-6182.2021.8(2).351-367

19. Malysheva E. G., Rogaleva O. S. Russian sports Internet discourse about figure skating: Specifics of dialogic communication (on the example of user comments about figure skating at Sports.ru). Mediascope, 2022, (1). (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30547/mediascope.1.2022.5

20. Nagaeva U. A. Destructive communicative practices as an element of sports discourse in the digital media. Innovative technologies in sports and physical education of the young generation: Proc. XII Sci.-Prac. Conf., Moscow, 22 Apr 2022. Moscow: HASK Media group, 2022, 164–168. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/buflga

21. Osetrova E. V. Rumors in the paradigm of linguistic genristics. Zanry Reci, 2015, (2): 80–89. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/thnaet

22. Polyakova L. S. The notion "speech behavior": Theoretical aspects. Current Issues in Philology and Pedagogical Linguistics, 2012, (14): 44–47. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/pqgahf

23. Skovorodnikov A. P. On the extreme speech aggression and its modal antipode. Political Linguistics, 2019, (3): 12–21. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26170/pl19-03-01

24. Taktarova A. V. Destructive verbal behavior of journalists in the social and political journal Ogonek. Nauka i sovremennost, 2014, (28): 219–223. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/rzgbpf

25. Trosheva T. B. Verbal aggression. Stylistic encyclopedic dictionary of Russian language, ed. Kozhina M. N. 2nd ed. Moscow: FLINTA, 2006, 340–343. (In Russ.)

26. Shcherbinina Yu. V. Russian language. Speech aggression and ways to overcome it. Moscow: FLINTA, 2018, 224. (In Russ.)

27. Shchitov A. G. Supporters and fans as sports discourse phenomenon. Philology. Theory & Practice, 2013, (8-1): 212–215. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/qixycb