Socio-Psychological Structure of Legal Relations

   A state governed by the rule of law relies on legal principles recognized and accepted by its society. To determine the socio-psychological structure of legal relations, the author compared the concept of legal relations in Western and Russian legal and social psychology. While Western publications contain no such concept whatsoever and focus mostly on interracial relations, Russian authors barely touch upon legal relations. The article introduces the main socio-psychological structure of legal relations and the term of legal social capital as an indicator of the support of state legislation by society. In the empirical part of the study, a survey of 467 respondents yielded a legal social capital of 0.805 (max 1.0). The socio-psychological structure of legal relations includes trust in people and law enforcement agencies, attitude to goals and values, assertive behavior, compliance with legal norms, and attitude to law as readiness to comply with the rights of others based on the principles of justice and equality. A regression analysis revealed the following socio-psychological predictors of attitude to law: legal consciousness (legal realism), assertive behavior, protection of human rights by law enforcement officers, and compliance with the principles of interpersonal justice. Legal cynicism proved to have a negative impact on attitude to law.

1. Ananiev B. G. Issues of modern human knowledge. Moscow: Nauka, 1977, 381. (In Russ.)

2. Beznosov D. S. Method of Attitude to Law. Methods and methodology of socio-psychological research, eds. Pochebut L. G., Gurieva S. D., Chiker V. A. St. Petersburg: Piter, 2023a, 517–524. (In Russ.)

3. Beznosov D. S. Understanding justice in modern western psychology. Institute of psychology Russian Academy of Sciences. Social and economic psychology, 2024a, 9(1): 83–99. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/fopykl

4. Beznosov D. S. Legal social capital in modern society. Society: Sociology, Psychology, Pedagogics, 2024b, (4): 53–61. (In Russ.) doi: 10.24158/spp.2024.4.7

5. Beznosov D. S. Socio-psychological features of legal relations in the process of of justice. Institute of psychology Russian Academy of Sciences. Social and economic psychology, 2023b, 8, (3): 165–182. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/ufvcwx

6. Beznosov D. S. Theoretical approaches to the concept of legal relations. SibScript, 2024c, 26(2): 223–234. (In Russ.) doi: 10.21603/sibscript-2024-26-2-223-234

7. Beznosov D. S. Socio-psychological analysis of person’s attitude to law. Psikhologicheskii Zhurnal, 2013, 34(4): 36–46. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/qzhzoh

8. Dmitruk V. N. Theory of state and law. Irkutsk: Novoe znanie, 2002, 182. (In Russ.)

9. Komarov S. A. General theory of state and law. 9th ed. Moscow: Iurait, 2019, 506. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/pvrekb

10. Lazurskiy A. F. Classification of personalities. Moscow: Iurait, 2019, 274. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/nyarrl

11. Myasishchev V. N. Consciousness as a unity of reflection of reality and people’s attitude to it. Psychology of consciousness, comp. and ed. Kulikov L. V. St. Petersburg: Piter, 2001, 56–63. (In Russ.)

12. Nartova-Bochaver S. K., Astanina N. B. Theories and empirical research on justice in the foreign personality psychology. Psikhologicheskii Zhurnal, 2014, 35(1): 16–32. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/rxreyt

13. Nasledov A. D. IBM SPSS 20 Statistics i AMOS: Professional statistical data analysis. St. Petersburg: Piter, 2013, 416. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/tbmlgf

14. Pozdnyakov V. M. Psychological jurisprudence as an interdisciplinary science and the area of psychological practice. Psychology and Law, 2017, 7(1): 206–219. (In Russ.) doi: 10.17759/psylaw.2017070117

15. Polishchuk N. I. Evolution of the idea of law and legal relations: Issues of theory and practice. St. Petersburg: Legal Institute, 2005, 269. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/qxfgnl

16. Pochebut L. G., Sventsitskiy A. L., Mararitsa L. V., Kazantseva T. V., Kuznetsova I. V. Social capital of the personality. Moscow: INFRA-M, 2014, 250. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/ufhbqp

17. Rubinstein S. L. Existence and consciousness. St. Petersburg: Piter, 2012, 288. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/yxelkm

18. Ameri T., Burgason K. A., DeLisi M., Heirigs M. H., Hochstetle A., Vaughn M. G. Legal cynicism: Independent construct or downstream manifestation of antisocial constructs? New evidence. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 2019, 64: 211–218. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2019.04.008

19. Buchanan N. T., Perez M., Prinstein M. J., Thurston I. B. Upending racism in psychological science: Strategies to change how science is conducted, reported, reviewed, and disseminated. American Psychologist, 2021, 76(7): 1097–1112. doi: 10.1037/amp0000905

20. Del Mar M., Stern S. Cognitive legal humanities: An introduction. Critical Analysis of Law, 2023, 10(1). doi: 10.33137/cal.v10i1.41642

21. Garay M. M., Remedios J. D. A review of White-centering practices in multiracial research in social psychology. Social & Personality Psychology Compass, 2021, 15(10). doi: 10.1111/spc3.12642

22. Gifford F. E., Reisig M. D. A multidimensional model of legal cynicism. Law and Human Behavior, 2019, 43(4): 383–396. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000330

23. Gonzales R. M., Plaut V. C. A raceless legal psychology in a system marked by race. Journal of Society for the Psychological Study of Social Issues, 2024, (3): 80–99. doi: 10.1111/josi.12605

24. Hage J. Are the cognitive sciences relevant for law? Law and Mind. A Survey of Law the Cognitive, eds. Brożek В. B., Hage J., Vincent N. A. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021, 17–49. doi: 10.1017/9781108623056.002

25. Hauser C., Simonyan A., Werner A. Condoning corrupt behavior of work: What roles-do machiavellianism, on-the-job experience, and neutralization play? Business and Society, 2020, 60(6): 1468–1506. doi: 10.1177/0007650319898474

26. Jeffers J. L. Justice is not blind: Disproportionate incarceration rate of people of color. Social Work in Public Health, 2022, 34(1): 113–121. doi: 10.1080/19371918.2018.1562404

27. Najdowski C. J., Stevenson M. C. A call to dismantle systemic racism in criminal legal system. Law and Human Behavior, 2022, 46(6): 398–414. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000510

28. Reny T. T., Newman B. J. The opinion-mobilizing effect of social protest against police violence: Evidence from the 2020 George Floyd protest. American Political Science Review, 2021, 115(4): 1499–1507. doi: 10.1017/S0003055421000460

29. Smalarz L., Eerdmans R. E., Lawrence M. L., Kulak K., Salerno J. M. Counterintuitive race effects in legal and nonlegal contexts. Law and Human Behavior, 2023, 47(1): 119–136. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000515

30. Torrez B., Sa-Kiera T., Hudson S. T. J., Dupree C. H. Racial equity in social psychological science: A guide for scholars, institutions, and the field. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2023, 17(1). doi: 10.31234/osf.io/7eavc

31. Verkuyten M., Yogeeswaran K., Adelman L. The social psychology of intergroup tolerance and intolerance. European Review of Social Psychology, 2023, 34(1): 1–43. doi: 10.1080/10463283.2022.2091326

32. Wszalek D. A. Cognitive communication and law: A model of systemic risks and system interventions. Journal of Law and the Biosiences, 2021, 8(1). doi: 10.1093/jlb/lsab005

33. Yakubets M. Between legal philosophy and cognitive science: The problem of tension. Ratios Juris, 2022, 35(2): 223–239. doi: 10.1111/raju.12342