Retardation in Nineteenth-Century Plays about Bureaucracy

Bureaucracy was an extremely popular theme in Russian drama in the 1850s. It seems to be a promising direction for modern historical and literary studies, as well as narratology. The article describes the functions of retardation in nineteenth-century plays that featured bureaucracy. It focuses on the artistic device of retardation, its place in the composition, its effect on the reader, its role in the speech of minor characters, etc. The research compared Vladimir Sollogub’s The Official (1856), Aleksei Potekhin’s Tinsel (1858), and Nikolai Lvov’s The World Is Not Without Good People (1857) against Alexander Ostrovsky’s iconic A Profitable Position (1856). The plays were subjected to the structural-semantic method, which made it possible to identify and describe their composition and characters with their ideological-conceptual impact on the story. The typological analysis of the plays was compared with that of Ostrovsky’s epic drama. In the minor plays, retardation helped to increase the tension before the denouement; in Ostrovsky’s comedy, it relieved the tension. Ostrovsky used the continuous retardation in the narratives of secondary characters to slow down the plot development and emphasize the semantic multifacetedness. In the epic drama, retardation blurred the boundaries of the dramatic situation to showcase its uncertainty, making the denouement nothing but a formal ending.

1. Barboi Yu. M. Theatrical form and a phenomenon of the drama action. Yaroslavl pedagogical bulletin, 2013, 1(4): 247–250. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/rzacdh

2. Barthes R. An introduction to the structural analysis of narrative. French semiotics: From structuralism to poststructuralism, comp., introduction, and tr. Kosikov G. K. Moscow: Progress, 2000, 196–234. (In Russ.)

3. Barthes R. Selected Works. Semiotics. Poetics. Moscow: Progress, 1989, 616. (In Russ.)

4. Bakhtin M. M. Questions of literature and aesthetics. Studies of various years. Moscow: Khud. lit., 1975, 504. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/wtjaln

5. Wijdan A. M. Role of narrator as key instance in dramatic events development in fiction text. Philology. Theory & Practice, 2022, 15(6): 1718–1724. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30853/phil20220346

6. Ermolaeva N. L. A. N. Ostrovsky, A. F. Pisemsky and A. A. Potekhin. Creative roll calls. Socio-cultural space of the Ivanovo region: Past, present, and future: Proc. Intern. Sci. Conf., Ivanovo, 6–9 Feb 2018. Ivanovo: IvSU, 2018, 42–53. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/ycfmwd

7. Genette G. Boundaries of the narrative. In: Genette G. Figures. Works on poetics. Moscow: Izd-vo im. Sabashnikova, 1998, vol. 1, 283–299. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/yqvbea

8. Zhilicheva G. A., Zhilichev P. E. Event retardation as the basis of the absurd discourse (a case study of the works of D. Danilov). Sibirskii Filologicheskii Zhurnal, 2023, (3): 182–196. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/hkjtcd

9. Zhuravleva A. I. Russian Drama and the Literary Process of the ХIХ Century. Moscow: MSU, 1988, 198. (In Russ.)

10. Kartavtseva I. V. Epic inclusions in the language of B. Brecht’s dramatic text. Humanities and law research, 2018, (3): 193–197. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.37494/2409-1030-2018-3-193-197

11. Lakshin V. Ya. Alexander Nikolaevich Ostrovsky. Moscow: Iskusstvo, 1976, 527. (In Russ.)

12. Lozinskaya E. V. Unnatural narratology: Abstract review. Sotsialnye i gumanitarnye nauki. Otechestvennaia i zarubezhnaia literatura. Seriia 7: Literaturovedenie, 2017, (1): 31–47. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/yleptl

13. Nikolina N. A. Means of the theatre code and their functions in plays by A. N. Ostrovskii. Russian Language at School, 2018, 79(4): 48–52. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30515/0131-6141-2018-79-4-48-52

14. Orlova O. S. Euphemisms and riddles about birth and death in Russian and English-speaking cultures. The principle of indirect nomination: Cognitive and cultural research. Moscow: LENAND, 2022, 240. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/ocnwwv

15. Romanov D. A. Comedy of communicative patterns: A. N. Ostrovsky "Handy Man". Teoriia iazyka i mezhkulturnaia kommunikatsiia, 2023, (2): 300–313. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/iakzuu

16. Seregin I. N. A Forgotten Article about the Plays by Leskov, Potekhin, and Others. Literaturnoe nasledstvo, 1963, 71: 133–144. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/xxhvol

17. Smolenskaya M. A. Unreliable narration and unreliable focalization in works of non-classical Russian literature. Bulletin of the South Ural State University. Ser. Social Sciences and the Humanities, 2024, 24(1): 78–86. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.14529/ssh240110

18. Stakhorsky S. Narratives of drama and its on-screen reflection (diegesis and ecphrasis). Voprosy teatra, 2019, (3-4): 412–435. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/glqols

19. Tikhomirov V. V. Comedy "The Forest" by Alexander Ostrovsky: Holding out for a hero. Experience of a comment. Vestnik of Kostroma State University, 2019, 25(3): 84–88. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/ntpped

20. Tyupa V. I. Horizons of historical narratology. St. Petersburg: Aleteiia, 2021, 270. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/fjyceo

21. Tyupa V. I. Narrative. Poetics: A dictionary of current terms and concepts, ed. Tamarchenko N. D. Moscow: Izd-vo Kulaginoi; Intrada, 2008, 134–135. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/rwxdln

22. Tyutelova L. G. The problem of spatial point of view in drama. Kul'tura i tekst, 2019, (4): 41–53. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/rxigkx

23. Tyutelova L. G. Epic in Russian drama of the XIXth century (exemplified by A. N. Ostrovsky’s plays). Sphere of culture, 2023, (3): 35–42. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/rneytq

24. Habermas J. Moral consciousness and communicative action. 2nd ed. St. Petersburg: Nauka, 2006, 377. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/qwnvpr

25. Khalizev V. E. Drama as an art phenomenon. Moscow: Iskusstvo, 1978, 240. (In Russ.)

26. Kholodov E. G. Ostrovsky’s mastery. Moscow: Iskusstvo, 1963, 542. (In Russ.)

27. Chapelain J. The French Academy on the tragicomedy The Cid. Literary manifestos of Western European classicists, comp. and ed. Kozlova N. P. Moscow: MSU, 1980, 273–298. (In Russ.)

28. Shklovsky V. B. The theory of prose. Moscow: Federation, 1929, 266. (In Russ.)

29. Fludernik M. Towards a "natural" narratology. L.-NY: Routledge, 1996, XVI+454.