"Proud Man" vs. "Peaceful Natives": Pushkin’s The Gypsies as Anticipation of the XIX Century
https://doi.org/10.21603/sibscript-2025-27-1-119-127
EDN: lieqtp
Abstract
In his poem The Gypsies (1824), Alexander Pushkin used various lexical means to polarize the system of characters: the proud Aleko is opposed to the peaceful Gypsies. The author clarifies the origin of the savage and peaceful types in Russian literature using the method of diachronic typological comparison. The proud man was a romantic hero in the Byronic context of the 1820s. In the traditional Russian Christian context, however, pride was a sin. As a result, Pushkin counterweighed the proud man by the meek personages, i.e., the Gypsies. This character system turned out to be paradigmatic for the Russian classics of the XIX century: its structure corresponded to the essential aspects explored in the nineteenth-century literature. Naturally, it was picked up by the most important literary texts of that epoch, which was widely recognized by the literary criticism of the 1850s, e.g., by Apollon Grigoriev and Pavel Annenkov, who made the greatest contribution to the preservation of Pushkin’s literary heritage. Pushkin’s model manifested itself in the classical texts by Ivan Turgenev, Ivan Goncharov, Alexander Ostrovsky, Fyodor Dostoevsky, and Leo Tolstoy. The model proved so effective it entered the Russian literature of the XX century.
References
1. Annenkov P. V. Critical essays. St. Petersburg: RCIH, 2000, 416. (In Russ.)
2. Annenkov P. V. Materials for the biography of A. S. Pushkin. Moscow: Sovremennik, 1984, 476. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/unmwwf
3. Annenkov P. V. Note to Section II. In: Pushkin A. S. The works of Pushkin, with appendices of materials for his biography, portrait, photographs of his handwriting, and his drawings, etc. St. Petersburg, 1855, vol. 3, 535–556. (In Russ.)
4. Belinskiy V. G. Collected works. Vol. 1. Articles, reviews, and notes: 1834–1836. Moscow: Khud. lit., 1976, 736. (In Russ.)
5. Vatsuro V. E. Commentator’s notes. St. Petersburg: Akad. proekt, 1994, 346. (In Russ.)
6. Vyazemskiy P. A. "The Prisoner of the Caucasus" by A. Pushkin. Pushkin in Lifetime Criticism: 1820–1827, ed. Vatsuro V. E. St. Petersburg: SPTC, 1996, 124–128. (In Russ.)
7. Grigoriev A. A. Literary criticism. Moscow: Khud. lit., 1967, 632. (In Russ.)
8. Gukovskiy G. A. Pushkin and Russian romantics. Moscow: Khud. lit., 1965, 356. (In Russ.)
9. Gurevich A. M. The dynamics of realism (in Russian literature of the 19th century). Moscow: GITIS, 1994, 88. (In Russ.)
10. Dobrolyubov N. A. Selected articles. Moscow: Det. lit., 1972, 320. (In Russ.)
11. Druzhinin A. V. Beautiful and eternal. Moscow: Sovremennik, 1988, 545. (In Russ.)
12. Egorov B. F. Apollon Grigoriev as a literary critic. In: Grigoriev A. A. Literary criticism. Moscow: Khud. lit., 1967, 3–39. (In Russ.)
13. Zhirmunskiy V. M. Byron and Pushkin. Leningrad: Nauka. Leningr. otd-nie, 1978, 425. (In Russ.)
14. Zhuravleva A. D. What does the contemporary Byronic hero look like? (Based on the series of novels about Harry Potter by J. K. Rowling). Gorizonty gumanitarnogo znaniia, 2022, (4): 15–24. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17805/ggz.2022.4.2
15. Kasatkina T. A. Dostoevsky’s characterology. A Typology of emotional and value orientations. Moscow: Nasledie, 1996, 336. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/ziwrbb
16. Kovtun N. V. Male heroes in search of wisdom (on the material of V. Rasputin’s prose). Siberian Philological Forum, 2022, (3): 4–18. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25146/2587-7844-2022-20-3-120
17. Kornilova E. N. The archetype "Byronic hero" in the literature of the 19th century. Problemy Istoricheskoy Poetiki, 2024, 22(1): 72–95. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15393/j9.art.2024.13362
18. Kornilova E. N. Gothic villain and Byronic hero. Problemy Istoricheskoy Poetiki, 2022, 20(4): 90–111. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15393/j9.art.2022.11662
19. Liang Z. Byronic motives in the image of Raskolnikov. Litera, 2023, (10): 189–198. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25136/2409-8698.2023.10.68858
20. Podosokorsky N. N. The religious element of the myth of Napoleon in the novel Crime and Punishment: The image of "Napoleon-prophet" and the mystic sects of Russian schismatics, worshippers of Napoleon. Dostoevsky and World Culture. Philological Journal, 2022, (2): 89–143. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22455/2619-0311-2022-2-89-143
21. Rassadin S. B. The playwright Pushkin: Poetics, ideas, and evolution. Moscow: Iskusstvo, 1977, 360. (In Russ.)
22. Skatov N. N. Nekrasov. Moscow: Molodaia gvardiia, 1994, 412. (In Russ.)
23. Tomashevskii B. V. Pushkin. Book 1 (1813–1824). Moscow-Leningrad: AS USSR, 1956, 743. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/iuetfa
24. Tyupa V. I. Artistic analytics. Moscow: Labirint, 2001, 192. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/qrpkdd
25. Uryupin I. S. Pushkin’s "The Gypsies": On a plot precedent in the stories of M. Gorky and I. A. Bunin. Sibirskii Filologicheskii Zhurnal, 2023, (2): 63–72. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17223/18137083/83/5
26. Chukovskiy K. I. Nekrasov’s skill. Moscow: Goslitizdat, 1962, 728. (In Russ.)
27. Shatin Yu. V. Russian literature in the mirror of semiotics. Moscow: IaSK, 2015, 344. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/vcegab
28. Eikhenbaum B. M. To prose. To poetry. Leningrad: Khud. lit. Leningr. otd-nie, 1986, 456. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Kuznetsov I.V. "Proud Man" vs. "Peaceful Natives": Pushkin’s The Gypsies as Anticipation of the XIX Century. SibScript. 2025;27(1):119-127. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21603/sibscript-2025-27-1-119-127. EDN: lieqtp