Metalanguage Reflection in Fiction: From the Object of Reflection to the Typology of Reflexives

Meta-reflexivity is an interdisciplinary object of psychology, psycholinguistics, traditional linguistics, and communication studies. The authors classified reflexives sampled from contemporary Russian fiction based on the features of the object and the level of metalanguage reflection. They used the method of typologization, as well as the semantic and discursive analyses, to develop a multilevel typology of reflexives. Based on the object of reflection, the reflexives were divided into the statements about the sign form and the statements about its meaning. On the second tier of typology, the statements about the sign form were divided into reflexives of external and internal forms whereas the statements about the meaning were divided into reflexives of close and distant meaning. Another taxonomy was based on the metalanguage reflection process as superficial or deep. The superficial metalanguage reflection generated stating reflexives that recorded the observed characteristics of the sign. The deep metalanguage reflection yielded operational reflexives that reflected the comprehension results. The research opens up new prospects for further scientific interpretation of the ontology and epistemology of metalanguage reflection, as well as contributes to the autoreference studies. The results of metalanguage reflection in fiction proved to be heterogenic in content. The taxonomy depended on the features of the object and the peculiarities of the metalanguage reflection process.

1. Aleksandrov O. A. "Naive" folklore studies as a form of manifestation of ordinary metalanguage consciousness (based on the precedent texts of the Russian Germans). Liberal Arts in Russia, 2020, 9(5): 342–351. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15643/libartrus-2020.5.7

2. Andrusenko E. A. The functions of metatext in works of fiction (based on works by V. Astafiev). Sibirskii Filologicheskii Zhurnal, 2011, (1): 89–94. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/numvan

3. Arutiunova N. D. Naive reflections on the naive linguistic worldview. Language about the language, ed. Arutiunova N. D. Moscow: IaRK, 2000, 7–19. (In Russ.)

4. Babenko N. G., Koreshkova E. K. Functional analysis of linguistic reflection in Evgeny Vodolazkin's "Justification of the Island". Vestnik of Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University. Series: Philology, Pedagogy, Psychology, 2021, (4): 24–32. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/kyvpdk

5. Batulina A. V. To the problem of metalinguistic contexts in mass literature. RUDN Journal of Language Studies, Semiotics and Semantics, 2017, 8(4): 1041–1050. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2299-2017-8-4-1041-1050

6. Bulygina T. V., Shmelev A. D. People about language: metalanguage reflection in non-linguistic texts. Logical analysis of language: The image of human in culture and language, eds. Arutiunova N. D., Levontina I. B. Moscow: Indrik, 1999, 146–161. (In Russ.)

7. Vepreva I. T. Metalinguistic utterances as signals of the socio-psychological climate during the COVID-19 pandemic. Russian language in modern scientific and educational space: Proc. Intern. Sci. Conf., Moscow, 28–29 Oct 2020. Moscow: PFUR, 2020, 46–48. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/cbmoem

8. Vepreva I. T. Linguistic reflection in Post-Soviet period. Moscow: OLMA-Press, 2005, 384. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/qrvksr

9. Zalevskaya A. A. "Language reflection" and "language consciousness": Problems of terminology. Vestnik TvGU. Series: Philology, 2015, (4): 29–36. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/vkeukj

10. Zalevskaya A. A. To distinguishing linguistic and metalinguistic awareness. Language, consciousness, and communication, eds. Krasnykh V. V., Izotov A. I. Moscow: MAKS Press, 2016, iss. 53, 112–120. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/wjfxmx

11. Zolotova N. O. Reflexivity of everyday consciousness and natural metalanguage. Journal of Psycholinguistics, 2019, (4): 50–61. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30982/2077-5911-2019-42-4-52-63

12. Kashkin V. B. Mundane philosophy of language and linguistic contrasts. Theoretical and applied linguistics, ed. Kashkin V. B. Voronezh: VSTU, 2002, iss. 3, 4–34. (In Russ.)

13. Kravchenko M. A. Constructive vs destructive metatext in works of modern Russian prose. Bulletin of the South Ural State University. Ser. Linguistics, 2024, 21(1): 34–41. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.14529/ling240105

14. Kravchenko M. A. From the search for a word to the search for the meaning of life, or The facets of metalanguage reflection in R. Senchin’s Rain in Paris. Modern linguistics: From theory to practice: Proc. III Kazan Intern. Linguistic Summit, Kazan, 14–19 Nov 2022. Kazan: Kazan University, 2023a, vol. 2, 90–94. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/uuriro

15. Kravchenko M. A. Theory of mundane linguistics: Systematic review of the current research direction. Philology. Theory & Practice, 2023b, 16(3): 773–779. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30853/phil20230153

16. Kravchenko M. A., Kravchenko O. V. The absurd as a metalanguage code (based on the material of artistic texts of absurdist aesthetics). Kritika i Semiotika, 2022, (1): 400–421. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25205/2307-1737-2022-1-400-421

17. Kuznetsova A. V. Meta-text in fiction text: Pragmatics and functions. Philology. Theory & Practice, 2020, 13(9): 265–269. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30853/filnauki.2020.9.49

18. Kunshchikova M. O. Metalinguistic activity of wordplay creator in classroom bilingual dialogs. Nauchnyi Dialog, 2021, (12): 71–88. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2021-12-71-88

19. Labunets N. V., Kochneva N. S. Onomastic reflection in works of V. P. Krapivin. Tyumen State University Herald. Humanities Research. Humanitates, 2019, 5(2): 6–19. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21684/2411-197X-2019-5-2-6-19

20. Mechkovskaya N. B. Natural language and metalanguage reflection in the age of the Internet. Russkij jazyk v nauchnom osveshchenii, 2006, (2): 165–185. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/hyzsdh

21. Nikitina L. B., Geiko E. V. Cognitive nature and nominative mechanisms of intellectual play (on the example of crosswords). Review of Omsk State Pedagogical University. Humanitarian Research, 2021, (2): 117–122. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.36809/2309-9380-2021-31-117-122

22. Nikolina N. A. Metalanguage comments in I. Bunin’s prose. Bulletin of Moscow Region State University. Series: Russian Philology, 2020, (4): 35–42. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/tijjcq

23. Nikolina N. A. Metalanguage comments in the works of M. E. Saltykov-Shchedrin. Russian Language at School, 2016, (2): 40–45. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/vvwnkr

24. Ordinary metalinguistic consciousness and naive linguistics, ed. Rostova A. N. Kemerovo-Barnaul: ASU, 2008, 480. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/rmmctr

25. Ordinary metalinguistic consciousness: Ontological and epistemological aspects, ed. Golev N. D. Kemerovo-Barnaul: ASU, 2009, pt. I, 532. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/qmmqdp

26. Rodionova I. G. The metalanguage function of introductory sentences with the conjunction yesli (if) in the works of K. G. Paustovsky. Tula Scientific Bulletin. History. Linguistics, 2021, (2): 109–118. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22405/2712-8407-2021-2-109

27. Rostova A. N. Metatext as a form of explication of metalanguage consciousness in Russian dialects of Siberia. Tomsk: TSU, 2000, 193. (In Russ.)

28. Ryabtseva N. K. Language and natural intelligence. Moscow: Academia, 2005, 640. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/qrmsyh

29. Sizikova T. E. Meta-model of reflection whithin the framework of meta-ontology. Sibirskiy Psikhologicheskiy Zhurnal, 2018, (68): 6–31. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17223/17267080/68/1

30. Frolova O. E. Incorrect speech impact: Text and metatext. Philological Notes, 2021, 19(2): 63–76. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17072/1857-6060-2021-19-2-63-76

31. Chernyak V. D. A verbal portrait of the author and metalinguistic activities of characters (a study in the works by Alexandr Solzhenitsyn). Filologiya v XXI veke, 2019, (S1): 305–310. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/cuvcix

32. Chernyakov A. N. Two fragments of "poetic philology" of Russian avant-garde. Vestnik Baltiyskogo federalnogo universiteta im. I. Kanta, 2012, (8): 87–93. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/pclbbt

33. Shumarina M. R. "Whatever a sound, then a gift...": Metalinguistic comments in prose of N. V. Gogol (for the 210th birth anniversary). Russian Language at School, 2019, (2): 53–61. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30515/0131-6141-2019-80-2-53-61

34. Shumarina M. R. Language in the mirror of fiction: Metalanguage reflection in Russian prose. Moscow: Flinta; Nauka, 2011, 328. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/utwqlb

35. Language about the language, ed. Arutiunova N. D. Moscow: IaRK, 2000, 624. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/rtdqrr

36. Goddard C. Natural semantic metalanguage. The Routledge Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, eds. Xu W., Taylor J. R. NY: Routledge, 2021, 93–110.

37. Jakobson R. Metalanguage as a linguistic problem. In: Jakobson R. Selected writings. Vol. VII. Contributions to comparative mythology. Studies in Linguistics and Philology, 1972–1982. Berlin-Boston: De Gruyter Mouton, 1985, 113–121. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110855463.113

38. Jaworski A., Coupland N., Galasinski D. Metalanguge: Social and ideological perspectives. The Hague: Walter de Gruyter, 2004, 324.

39. Niedzielski N. A., Preston D. R. Folk linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 2003, 375.

40. Vepreva I., Kuprina T. Coronavirus and us: Metalinguistic portrait of Covid-19 pandemic. European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences (EpSBS). Vol. 115. The Russian Language in Modern Scientific and Educational Environment (RLMSEE-2020), ed. Shaklein V. M. European Publisher, 2021, 342–354. https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2021.09.38

41. Wierzbicka A. Metatekst w tekście. O spójności tekstu, ed. Mayenowa M. R. Wrocław, 1971, 105–121.