Verbal Means of Negative Assessment in Online Restaurant Reviews
https://doi.org/10.21603/sibscript-2025-27-1-12-20
EDN: yuabjh
Abstract
The article describes the verbal means of expressing a negative assessment in online reviews. The study included online reviews on the Shashlykoff restaurant in the Russian digital directory 2GIS. The author addressed the issue of virtual genres, e.g., online reviews, online comments, etc. Online reviews as a genre appeared to be secondary and dialogic in nature, linguistically unlimited, informative, and evaluative. Evaluativeness was the main genre-forming component. While objects of evaluation were diverse, the article concentrates on the means of expressing a negative assessment towards cuisine, which proved to be units of the lexical level, i.e., adjectives, adverbs, nouns, and idioms. Colloquial and slang words with a negative connotation proved especially popular. Adverbs of measure and degree intensified evaluation at the lexical level. The group of stylistic means included hyperbole, litany, irony, and pun. Vocabulary expressed the negative assessment explicitly, while grammar and graphics only enhanced the evaluative component. Exclamation points, interrogative sentences, and comparative phrases also helped to bring forward the negative assessment. Graphic means included excessive punctuation, capitalization, and emoji.
References
1. Arutiunova N. D. Types of language values. Assessment. Event. Fact. Moscow: Nauka, 1988, 341. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/ykbsrj
2. Birr-Tsurkan L. F. Ways of expressing evaluation in product reviews (based on "Test" magazine, Germany). Cultural industries in consumer society institutions: Proc. All-Russian Sci. Conf., Veliky Novgorod, 7–8 Apr 2020. Veliky Novgorod: NovSU, 2020, 6–15. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.34680/978-5-89896-672-0/2020.cultindustry.01
3. Boychuk E. I. Lexical and grammatical features of Internet reviews in the Russian and English languages. Verhnevolzhski philological bulletin, 2021, (3): 107–115. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20323/2499-9679-2021-3-26-107-115
4. Bondareva E. P., Chistyakova G. V. Universal value worldview: Analysis of virtual tourist reviews. Litera, 2021, (4): 18–32. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25136/2409-8698.2021.4.32610
5. Bylina E. E. Communicative-pragmatic aspects of the genre of Internet reviews. Baltic Humanitarian Journal, 2021, 10(4): 210–215. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/hxgemi
6. Vasilyeva E. V. Linguistic and creative activity of the authors of online reviews on perfumery. ISSC-2018. Linguistics: Proc. 56 Intern. Sci. Student Conf., Novosibirsk, 22–27 Apr 2018. Novosibirsk: NSU, 2018, 13–14. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/xvmnfb
7. Volf E. M. Functional semantics of evaluation. Moscow: Editorial URSS, 2002, 280. (In Russ.)
8. Vu N. L. Online reviews of Russian and Vietnamese tourists about Moscow: A comparative aspect. Slavic culture: Origins, traditions, interaction. XI Cyril and Methodius Readings: Proc. Intern. Sci.-Prac. Conf., Moscow, 26 May 2021. Moscow: Pushkin Institute, 2021, 83–90. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/drymbz
9. Govorunova L. Yu. Genre differentiation of the Internet references of Russian tourists. Grani poznaniia, 2014, (1): 9–12. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/rwcfiz
10. Govorunova L. Yu. Internet reviews of Russian and Italian tourists as object of assessment: Comparative aspect. Grani poznaniia, 2015, (1): 91–94. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/tsgufl
11. Dakhalaeva E. Ch. The Internet commentary and the Internet opinion: The parameters of the genres differentiation. Modern problems of science and education, 2014, (6). (In Russ.) URL: https://science-education.ru/ru/article/view?id=16222 (accessed 10 Oct 2024). https://elibrary.ru/ripgqy
12. Eremina M. A. Speech genre of feedback in Internet communicative space. Nauchnyi Dialog, 2016, (5): 34–45. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/waewin
13. Issers O. S. Dialogue with the consumer in the era of mediatization: Responses to reviews about medical services in the context of Internet communication. Current Issues in Philology and Pedagogical Linguistics, 2023a, (2): 43–54. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.29025/2079-6021-2023-2-43-54
14. Issers O. S. Speech genre of consumer reviews and its transformation in the digital age (based on reviews of doctors). Zanry Reci, 2023b, 18(4): 375–385. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18500/2311-0740-2023-18-4-40-375-385
15. Kosmarskaya I. V. Speech genre of customer online review (based on reviews of clothing items). Vestnik of Moscow State Linguistic University. Humanities, 2024, (5): 63–69. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/pnhtui
16. Kostenko A. K., Vystropova O. S. Linguistic specificity of the Internet-text reviews about infectious diseases doctors. Aktualnye problemy lingvistiki i lingvodidaktiki v sovremennom inoiazychnom obrazovanii, 2023, (1): 62–67. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/usxsvh
17. Krylova M. N. The dynamics of the category of evaluation in the Russian language (based on comparative constructions). Tyumen State University Herald. Humanities Research. Humanitatis, 2016, 2(2): 45–55. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21684/2411-197X-2016-2-2-45-55
18. Kurdakova D. K. Corporate image of the organization and its verbal components in online reviews on Alventa company. Socio-economic research, humanities, and jurisprudence: Theory and practice: Proc. XV Intern. Sci.-Prac. Conf., Novosibirsk, 8–20 Jun 2017. Novosibirsk: CDSC, 2017, 62–70. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/ytdbph
19. Long V. N. Means of expressing a positive assessment in the Internet reviews of tourists about Moscow. Humanities in the modern world: Proc. VII Intern. Sci.-Prac. Conf., Kaliningrad, 30 May – 1 Jun 2019. Kaliningrad: Western Branch of The Presidential Academy, RANEPA, 2019, 51–54. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/gzurol
20. Makeenkova T. V., Malinkina N. A. Linguodidactic potential of the Internet review in teaching Russian as a foreign language in a medical university. Smolenskii meditsinskii almanakh, 2022, (4): 52–55. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/duphsy
21. Marinchenko I. A., Vasil'eva E. V. Functions of language game in perfumery discourse. Philology. Theory & Practice, 2020, 13(7): 148–153. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30853/filnauki.2020.7.27
22. Mufazalova Yu. S. Syntactic means of expressing evaluation in the English-language media texts (based on The Guardian edition). Language and intercultural communication: Modern vectors of development: Proc. II Intern. Sci.-Prac. Conf, Pinsk, 26 Mar 2021. Pinsk: Polessky State University, 2021, 181–186. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/zkmskh
23. Pogorelova I. V. Linguo-semiotic aspect of Internet-commentary. Philology. Theory & Practice, 2017, (10-3): 149–152. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/zmypqr
24. Stopa A. V. Genre features of reviews and online reviews: Comparative analysis. Ratio et Natura, 2020, (2-2). (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/aalqgc
25. Terskikh M. V. The genre of the Internet review in the tourist discourse. New Media in Russia: Studies of language and communication processes, ed. Issers O. S. Omsk: OmSU, 2015, 154–177. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/vcrbzn
26. Tulupova E. N., Golovina E. V. Lexico-stylistic peculiarities of tourist's Internet commentary. Philology. Theory & Practice, 2019, 12(5): 257–261. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30853/filnauki.2019.5.55
Review
For citations:
Falomkina I.P. Verbal Means of Negative Assessment in Online Restaurant Reviews. SibScript. 2025;27(1):12-20. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21603/sibscript-2025-27-1-12-20. EDN: yuabjh