Archaeological Heritage Sites: State Cadastral Registration and State Protection
https://doi.org/10.21603/sibscript-2024-26-3-323-334
Abstract
Archaeological heritage sites are a special object of real estate; they have a particular legal status and state protection issues. This article describes the state cadastral registration of archaeological monuments and sites, as well as the function of the state cadaster in their protection by the state. The registration procedure for state protection includes a number of measures. For instance, land plots that contain an archeological monument in their boundaries are subject to encumbrance or restriction of ownership rights. Certain information about cultural heritage sites cannot be published openly if the site enters the Unified State Register of Cultural Heritage of the Nations of the Russian Federation. The author how the Kemerovo Region and other regions register their archaeological monuments and sites in the Russian State Register (Rosreestr), the State Land Registry (Roskadastr), and the Unified State Register of Real Estate. The current procedure for state cadastral registration needs some improvements in relation to archaeological heritage sites. Under the modern conditions, the ban on publishing the location of archaeological sites is ineffective.
About the Author
Yu. Yu. GizeyRussian Federation
Yulia Yu. Gizey.
Kemerovo
Competing Interests:
The author declared no potential conflict of interests regarding the research, authorship, and / or publication of this article.
References
1. Akimova S. V. Archaeological heritage register as a preservation factor. Proceedings of the IV (XX) All-Russian Archaeological Congress in Kazan, Kazan, 20–25 Oct 2014. Kazan: Otechestvo, 2014, vol. 4, 379–380. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/wfkryb
2. Bogomyakov I. Ownership of land plots occupied by objects of archaeological heritage. Khoziaistvo i pravo, 2011, (4): 118–121. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/umqrep
3. Burinchik A. S., Lisetskii F. N. Features of protection and state registration of objects of archaeological heritage in the Belgorod region. Regional Geosystems, 2020, 44(4): 375–387. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18413/2712-7443-2020-44-4-375-387
4. Vasilyev S. A. Problems of legal support of preservation of archaeological heritage sites. Kultura: upravlenie, ekonomika, pravo, 2023, (3): 19–23. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18572/2070-2159-2023-3-19-23
5. Vasyutin S. A., Marochkin A. G., German P. V., Sizyov A. S., Gorlyshkin N. E. Key challenges to the archaeological heritage preservation in Kuzbass. Part I: "Archaeological treasure hunting". Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2020, 22(2): 307–317. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2020-22-2-307-317
6. Volkodav N. V., Davydenko G. G. Prevention of unauthorized excavation in Kuban region: Issues of individual aspects. Preservation of archaeological heritage: Issues and prospects: Proc. Conf. "Prevention of illegal archeology activities", Moscow, 9–10 Dec 2013. Moscow: IA RAS, 2015, 52–61. (In Russ.)
7. Gizey Yu. Yu., Onishchenko S. S., Sokolov P. G. Preservation of archaeological heritage sites in the Kemerovo region – Kuzbass: some aspects of regional specifics. Proceedings VI (XXII) All-Russian Archaeological Congress in Samara, Samara, 1–2 Oct 2020. Samara: SSSPU, 2020, vol. III, 187–189. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/rkyuqe
8. Grishchenko V. A., Grishchenko Yu. V. Procedures for the protection of archaeological heritage objects in the Sakhalin region. Proceedings of the III (XIX) All-Russian Archaeological Congress, Veliky Novgorod – Staraya Russa, 24–29 Oct 2011. St. Petersburg: IHMS RAS, 2011, vol. II, 284–285. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/swhsgx
9. Danilenko E. P., Burinchik A. S. Formation of territories of archaeological heritage sites in the Belgorod Region. Vector of Geosciences, 2019, 2(1): 33–43. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24411/2619-0761-2019-10005
10. Dvornikov A. S., Zabotin N. A. Unauthorized excavation in Tver region and prevention issues. Preservation of archaeological heritage: Issues and prospects: Proc. Conf. "Prevention of illegal archeology activities", Moscow, 9–10 Dec 2013. Moscow: IA RAS, 2015, 62–67. (In Russ.)
11. Doroshenko P. V., Ipeeva A. A. Issues of state protection of archaeological heritage objects: Accounting, inventory, control and supervision activities and state historical and cultural expertise. City fit for life: Proc. V Intern. Sci.-Prac. Conf., Krasnoyarsk, 10–11 Nov 2022. Krasnoyarsk: SFU, 2023, 488–492. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/rqivdg
12. Zubenko Yu. S. Land plots with objects of archaeological heritage in the Russian Federation: Legal problems. Scientific Bulletin of the Gorno-Altaisk State University, ed. Sukhova M. G. Gorno-Altaisk: GASU, 2020, vol. 15, 166–171. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/qkebdw
13. Isaev M. Yu. Features and prospects of development of legal protection of archaeological heritage sites. Alleia nauki, 2019, 1(11): 733–739. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/satlgb
14. Kalinin G. I. Protection of public interests: Compensation for damage caused to archaeological heritage. Khoziaistvo i pravo, 2023, (4): 110–121. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18572/0134-2398-2023-4-110-121
15. Karetnikov A. L. Illegal excavation near the Marya Svyataya tract as a factor of destruction of archaeological sites. Ecology and Culture: From the past to the future: Proc. IV sci.-Pract. Conf., Karabikha, 2–3 Dec 2010. Karabikha-Yaroslavl: N. A. Nekrasov State Literary and Memorial Museum-Reserve "Karabikha", 2010, 32–37. (In Russ.)
16. Kenig A. V. GIS and remote sensing tools for monitoring the territories of archaeological heritage sites. Proceedings of the IV (XX) All-Russian Archaeological Congress in Kazan, Kazan, 20–25 Oct 2014. Kazan: Otechestvo, 2014, vol. 4, 406–407. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/wfksbn
17. Kirillov A. N. The protection of archaeological sites of the Udmurt Republic from unauthorized excavations. Glazov: Glazov State Pedagogical Institute named after V. G. Korolenko, 2011, 63. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/qpswtj
18. Klebanov L. R. Crimes against archaeological heritage: Conception, features, forms, peculiarities of qualification (ending). Biznes v zakone. Ekonomiko-iuridicheskii zhurnal, 2013, (4): 34–37. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/phvzdp
19. Kondrashev L. V. Archaeological heritage sites: A historical source or a real estate object? V (XXI) All-Russian Archaeological Congress, Barnaul, 2–7 Oct 2017. Barnaul: ASU, 2017, 508–509. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/zgmjyd
20. Lazarev A. S., Fetkulin A. V., Chernis Ia. S. Objects of cultural heritage on the Kostroma region territory which were subjected to unauthorized excavations and destruction as a result of the activities of "black diggers" in 2011–2013. Preservation of archaeological heritage: Issues and prospects: Proc. Conf. "Prevention of illegal archeology activities", Moscow, 9–10 Dec 2013. Moscow: IA RAS, 2015, 141–151. (In Russ.)
21. Makarov N. A. Predatory excavation as a factor in the destruction of archaeological heritage of Russia. Preservation of archaeological heritage of Russia: Proc. round table in the Council of Federation, 19 Mar 2004. Moscow: Council of Federation, 2004, 13–24. (In Russ.)
22. Makarov N. A., Belyaev L. A., Engovatova A. V. Archeology and modernity: Russian realia. Rossijskaja Arheologija, 2015, (2): 5–15. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/udzbnr
23. Mikhalchenko A. P. Cadastral registration as a means of archaeological heritage preservation in Primorye. Russia and the Pacific, 2018, (4): 190–204. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24411/1026-8804-2018-10059
24. Panfilov A. N. The legal concept of archaeological heritage sites in Russian legislation and its legal certainty. Gosudarstvo i Pravo, 2018, (1): 72–81. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/qynilv
25. Papkov I. A., Kukharuk N. S. Contradictions in legislative acts related to lands occupied by objects of archaeological heritage. Tendentsii razvitiia nauki i obrazovaniia, 2015, (6): 25–27. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/unvxgl
26. Piotrovskii M. B. Preservation issues of cultural heritage. Preservation of archaeological heritage of Russia: Proc. round table in the Council of Federation, 19 Mar 2004. Moscow: Council of Federation, 2004, 8–9. (In Russ.)
27. Polevodov A. V., Grachev M. A. Protection of cultural (archaeological) heritage sites in Western Siberia: Legal and practical aspects. V (XXI) All-Russian Archaeological Congress, Barnaul, 2–7 Oct 2017. Barnaul: ASU, 2017, 833–834. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/wsvqow
28. Sanzharov S. N. Concept and forms of predatory excavations of objects of archaeological heritage. Issues of law: theory and practice, 2021, (53): 244–250. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/ryrzlg
29. Sukharukova V. S. Cadastral registration as a measure to ensure the conservation objects of archaeological heritage in territory of the Altai Region. Vestnik molodezhnoi nauki Altaiskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta, 2021, (1): 353–356. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/agvasj
30. Engovatova A. V. The preservation of the archaeological heritage in Russia. Present situation. Vestnik NSU. Series: History and Philology, 2013, 12(3): 32–47. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/qzdriz
Review
For citations:
Gizey Yu.Yu. Archaeological Heritage Sites: State Cadastral Registration and State Protection. SibScript. 2024;26(3):323-334. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21603/sibscript-2024-26-3-323-334