Variability of Uncertainty in Mental Reconstruction of Danger and Safety

Subjective images of danger and security depend on the context of uncertainty. This article introduces a mental reconstruction of danger and safety for different types of uncertainty. The authors used the methods of associative experiment, subjective ranking, and semantic differential. The empirical data were processed by averaging, ranking, factor analysis, and the Mann-Whitney criterion. The survey involved students from several Russian metropolitan and provincial universities (19–20 y.o.; n = 105; 74 females). Danger demonstrated a less complex mental structure than safety. The mental reconstruction of danger / safety included three types of uncertainty. Temporal uncertainty included period, time, and frequency of danger / safety. Objective uncertainty was connected with the place, environment, and source of danger / safety. Subjective uncertainty covered controllability, scale, and cause of danger / safety. Uncertainty proved more important for danger than for safety. The subjective level of danger grew together with objective uncertainty, especially when the source of danger was unclear, and went down with temporal uncertainty. The subjective level of security increased with temporal and subjective uncertainty and decreased with objective uncertainty. When the subjective significance of danger and safety went up, the differentiation of uncertainty in their assessment became less significant. The study identified the effect of variability of uncertainty on the mental reconstruction made by the subjects of danger / security, as well as identified some understudied areas.

1. Adilov S. G. The ability to anticiperate and the phenomenon of uncertainty. Natsionalnoe zdorovie, 2019, (3): 81–83. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/uvywmz

2. Valeeva G. V., Khoteeva R. I., Malinichev D. M., Arpentieva M. R. Maintaining psychological safety of a person in higher education. Psychopedagogy in Law Enforcement, 2023, 28(2): 186–194. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24412/1999-6241-2023-293-186-194

3. Dzhembek Yu. I. The phenomenon of uncertainty and the level of tolerance to uncertainty in youth students. Informatsiia i obrazovanie: granitsy kommunikatsii, 2022, (14): 282–283. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/hxbnar

4. Zhanguzhinova O. Yu. Personal safety as an interdisciplinary concept. Current issues of social and psychological sciences: Theory, methodology, and practice: Proc. Symposium XVIII (L) Intern. Sci. Conf., Kemerovo, 24–29 Apr 2023. Kemerovo: KemSU, 2023, 30–32. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/xafspp

5. Zhyliakova E. V. Uncertainty of the external environment as integral part of the formation of an anti-crisis strategy. Aktualnye nauchnye issledovaniia v sovremennom mire, 2017, (5-6): 35–40. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/yrecmp

6. Kozlov A. V., Potanin S. P. Students being trained to actions in the state of professional environment uncertainty. Aktualnye problemy fizicheskoi i spetsialnoi podgotovki silovykh struktur, 2016, (1): 139–143. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/vodjfh

7. Krasnianskaya T. M., Tylets V. G., Iokhvidov V. V. Attribution of situations of uncertainty in hazard / safety parameters by carriers of basic chronobiotypes. The Humanities (Yalta), 2022, (2): 133–141. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/wsphyg

8. Krasnianskaya T. M., Tylets V. G., Lyakhov A. V. Scenario design of security by students with different levels of tolerance to uncertainty. World of Science. Pedagogy and psychology, 2020, 8(4). (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15862/58PSMN420

9. Krasheninnikova A. S. Man in conditions of uncertainty and instability. Nauchnyi vestnik Omskogo gosudarstvennogo meditsinskogo universiteta, 2022, 2(3): 51–54. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/ceagej

10. Kuksova M. A., Maksinyaeva M. R. On the issue of personal security of the subject as an integral formation. FLS. Fundamentals of Life Safety, 2023, (2): 19–22. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/zzspnz

11. Melnichenko N. F., Burykin A. D. Uncertainty classification. Vestnik nauchnykh konferentsii, 2017, (1-5): 116–117. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/xxhkmj

12. Pavlova E. M. Model of connections between self-esteem of creativity and intelligence, tolerance of uncertainty and creativity. Psychology. Journal of the Higher School of Economics, 2018, 15(1): 69–78. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17323/1813-8918-2018-1-69-78

13. Sandomirsky M. E. Uncertainty as a socio-psychological phenomenon of the information society. Chelovecheskii faktor: Sotsialnyi psikholog, 2017, (2): 230–234. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/xcxgve

14. Selivanov A. I. Methodological problems of the protection of objects that are in a state of uncertainty. Microeconomics, 2012, (4): 140–143. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/pduaal

15. Serykh A. B., Anzuta A. N., Buksha L. F., Bugaeva A. S. Theoretical foundations of the influence of personal anxiety on psychological safety of a student. Globalnyi nauchnyi potentsial, 2023, (6): 134–136. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/rccogk

16. Sonin A. A. Personality as a subject of information and psychological security. Molodezh i nauka: aktualnye problemy pedagogiki i psikhologii, 2022, (7): 114–120. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/kndjkl

17. Tihonov A. A. Subject of knowledge and uncertainty. Moscow: Labirint, 2004, 264. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/qwhocn

18. Tylets V. G., Krasnianskaya T. M. Organizational challenges to corporate security psychology under conditions of uncertainty. Social psychology: Issues of theory and practice: Proc. VI Intern. Sci.-Prac. Conf., Moscow, 12–13 May 2021. Moscow: MSUPE, 2021, 558–560. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/woetpx

19. Tylets V. G., Krasnianskaya T. M. Psycholinguistic meaning of the concepts "danger" and "safety" in the language consciousness of students. Journal of Psycholinguistics, 2020, (1): 84–97. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30982/2077-5911-2020-43-1-84-97

20. Tylets V. G., Krasnianskaya T. M., Iokhvidov V. V. Temporal components of the personal security concept of subjects with different levels of tolerance to uncertainty. Gumanizatsiia obrazovaniia, 2022, (1): 129–144. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/nhburl

21. Tylets V. G., Krasnianskaya T. M., Lyakhov A. V. Correlates of safety time in subjects with different levels of tolerance to uncertainty. Gumanizatsiia obrazovaniia, 2020, (5): 29–42. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/lejjoo

22. Tylets V. G., Krasnianskaya T. M., Lyakhov A. V. Representation of safety practices by young people with different levels of tolerance to uncertainty. International journal of medicine and psychology, 2023, 6(1): 18–24. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/oagutt

23. Chirkova T. I., Kochneva E. M., Simanova A. A. Uncertainty as a subject of psychological research. Nižegorodskij psihologičeskij almanah, 2020, 1(2): 101–114. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/kgovse

24. Shamolin R. V. Uncertainty and time. Vestnik Novosibirskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriia: Psikhologiia, 2007, 1(1): 66–69. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/iixnjx

25. Frazier M. L., Fainshmidt S., Klinger R. L., Pezeshkan A., Vracheva V. Psychological safety: A meta-analytic review and extension. Personnel Psychology, 2017, 70(1): 113–165. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12183

26. O’Donovan R., Van Dun D., McAuliffe E. Measuring psychological safety in healthcare teams: Developing an observational measure to complement survey methods. BMC Medical Re-search Methodology, 2020, (20). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-020-01066-z