Reality Framing in Russian, English, and Chinese Phraseological Units with Flowers

Floriography is part of many cultures and provides an effective characterization means for a particular linguistic culture. The frame analysis method is a popular tool in phraseology, but it has never been applied to phraseological units with the flowers component. The study examined phraseological units with the flowers component in Russian, English, and Chinese in order to define their role in the corresponding linguistic worldviews. The frame organization analysis made it possible to identify the way these languages categorize reality. Phraseological units with flowers are more typical of Chinese and English; they are less typical of the Russian linguistic culture as a result of the harsh climatic conditions and the farming traditions. In this research, the frame analysis hinted at similar cognitive processes in all the three linguistic cultures, which was manifested as common subframes at all levels. The main subframes included characteristics of the subject, action aimed at the subject, qualitative assessment of reality, and evaluative characteristics of the action. In addition, flower names described different human qualities, characterized an ongoing event, and evaluated actions performed by the subject. Differences were registered at the slot level as a partially overlapping list of qualities, assessments, characteristics, and actions, which reflected the specifics of each national worldview. The results can facilitate intercultural communication for Russian, English, and Chinese speakers. 

1. Abdullaeva F. E., Bulgakova O. A. Specifics of the frame organization of somatic phraseological units in Russian, Teleut, and Chinese. East – West: Intersection of Cultures: Proc. II World Congress, Kyoto, 2–6 Oct 2019. Kyoto: Tanaka Print, 2019, vol. I, 399–406. (In Russ.) https://www.elibrary.ru/izvihx

2. Alefirenko N. F. Phraseological value in the light of frame semantics. Uchenye zapiski Zabaikalskogo gosudarstvennogo gumanitarno-pedagogicheskogo universiteta im. N. G. Chernyshevskogo, 2011, (2): 11–17. (In Russ.) https://www.elibrary.ru/nrbpqr

3. Araeva L. A. Peace in phraseological units of the world. Word. Text. Time XII. Phraseology in ideolexy and the system of Slavic languages. To the 200th anniversary of Taras Shevchenko. Szczecin-Greifswald, 2014, 15–23. (In Russ.) https://www.elibrary.ru/uimzgn

4. Babushkin A. P. Common sense in the denotative meanings of phraseological units. Cognitive factors of interaction of phraseology with related disciplines: Proc. III Intern. Sci. Conf., Belgorod, 19–21 Mar 2013. Belgorod: ID "Belgorod", 2013, 40–42. (In Russ.) https://www.elibrary.ru/shgpcl

5. Baranov A. N., Dobrovolsky D. O. Conceptual model of the meaning of an idiom. Cognitive aspects of vocabulary: German language, ed. Rosen E. V. Tver: TverSU, 1991, 3–13. (In Russ.) https://www.elibrary.ru/uobdmp

6. Basko N. V. Phraseological units as a means of linguistic support for intercultural communication. National cultures in intercultural communication: Proc. I Intern. Sci.-Prac. Conf., Minsk, 14–15 Apr 2016. Minsk: Segment, 2016, pt. 2, 38–44. (In Russ.) https://www.elibrary.ru/ztdxzb

7. Boldyrev N. N. Conceptual space of cognitive linguistics. Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki, 2004, (1): 18–36. (In Russ.) https://www.elibrary.ru/opvzuj

8. Bratchikova N. S. Chromatic worldview as a fragment of the linguistic worldview in the Finnish language. Russia – West: Dialogue of cultures: Proc. XI Intern. Conf., Moscow, 28–30 Nov 2005. Moscow: MSU, 2005, 20–23. (In Russ.)

9. Bulgakova O. A. Linguistic worldview through the prism of zoological phraseological units in Teleut and Russian. Preserving and developing languages and cultures of indigenous peoples of Siberia: Proc. IV All-Russian Sci.-Prac. Conf., Abakan, 1–2 Oct 2020. Abakan: N. F. Katanov KSU, 2020, 79–82. (In Russ.) https://www.elibrary.ru/lnggkq

10. Bulgakova O. A., Kuznetsova A. A. The peculiarities of the frame-based organization of phraseological units that include words about food and names of dishes in the Russian, Chinese and Teleut languages. Ekologiia iazyka i kommunikativnaia praktika, 2017, (2): 54–65. (In Russ.) https://www.elibrary.ru/yusmov

11. Walter H. Old German background of new Russian phraseology. Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2012, (4-3): 94–98. (In Russ.) https://www.elibrary.ru/pyiyhl

12. Weisgerber L. Native language and the developing of the spirit. 2nd ed. Moscow: URSS, 2004, 232. (In Russ.) https://www.elibrary.ru/qwhamr

13. Vinogradov V. V. Selected works. Lexicology and lexicography. Moscow: Nauka, 1977, vol. 3, 317. (In Russ.) https://www.elibrary.ru/vtgrgz

14. Humboldt W. von. Selected works on linguistics. Moscow: Progress, 1984, 398. (In Russ.)

15. Guselnikova O. V. Different techniques of frame. Mir nauki, kul'tury, obrazovaniya, 2009a, (5): 29–32. (In Russ.) https://www.elibrary.ru/iurmax

16. Guselnikova O. V. Cognitive aspect of the study of phraseology. Aktualnye voprosy sovremennoi nauki, 2009b, (5): 155–162. (In Russ.) https://www.elibrary.ru/rciujd

17. Guselnikova O. V. New tendencies in phraseography. Mir nauki, kul'tury, obrazovaniya, 2011, (5): 297–299. (In Russ.) https://www.elibrary.ru/okaoav

18. Danilenko V. P. Language world concept in L. Weisgerber’s theory. Filologiya i chelovek, 2009, (1): 7–17. (In Russ.) https://www.elibrary.ru/ndvnaj

19. Dashieva S. Ts. D., Dampilon N. B. Spatial concepts ‘heaven’ and ‘earth’ in the Russian, Buryat and Chinese phraseological picture of the world. Mir nauki, kul'tury, obrazovaniya, 2022, (2): 444–447. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24412/1991-5497-2022-293-444-446

20. Dobrydneva E. A. Modern Russian phraseology: categorical features and communicative properties. Volgograd: Peremena, 1988, 88. (In Russ.)

21. Zalevskaya A. A. "Image of the world" vs. "Linguistic worldview". Worldview and its representation, eds. Grishaeva L. I., Popova M. K. Voronezh: VSU, 2003, iss. 2, 41–47. (In Russ.) https://www.elibrary.ru/qrxfan

22. Karasik V. I. Language circle: personality, concepts, discourse. Volgograd: Peremena, 2002, 477. (In Russ.) https://www.elibrary.ru/ugqamp

23. Kopytin A. I. Flowers and humans: cultural, ecopsychological and therapeutic aspects. Ecopoiesis: Eco-Human Theory and Practice, 2022, 3(2): 36–50. (In Russ.) https://www.elibrary.ru/uqaxpo

24. Kunin A. V. Modern English phraseology. Dubna: Feniks+, 2005, 479. (In Russ.) https://www.elibrary.ru/qrsdhn

25. Lesina G. S. Analysis of Chinese phraseological units Chengyu. Molodoi uchenyi, 2020, (23): 701–703. (In Russ.) https://www.elibrary.ru/tuqnfg

26. Liu A. Problems of phraseological units in intercultural communication (based on the phraseological units of Russian and Chinese languages). Mir nauki, kul'tury, obrazovaniya, 2020, (4): 327–329. (In Russ.) https://www.elibrary.ru/okopgt

27. Maslova Zh. N. Brief description of the main points of a poetic text cognitive research. Izvestiia Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta, 2011, (2): 38–42. (In Russ.) https://www.elibrary.ru/mkflos

28. Mokienko V. M. The life of the Russian phraseology in the contemporary speech. Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2012, (4-4): 59–62. (In Russ.) https://www.elibrary.ru/pzdrep

29. Mokienko V. M. Slavic phraseology. 2nd ed. Moscow: Vyssh. shk., 1989. 286. (In Russ.)

30. Molotkov A. I. Fundamentals of phraseology of the Russian language. Leningrad: Nauka, 1977. 283. (In Russ.)

31. Nikitin M. V. Derived notions of the concept. Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki, 2004, (1): 53–64. (In Russ.) https://www.elibrary.ru/opvzvd

32. Ostrovaya Yu. S. Russian language picture of the world and its specificity (nature – culture – cognition). Vestnik Udmurtskogo universiteta. Seriya Istoriya i filologiya, 2022, (3): 654–661. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.35634/2412-9534-2022-32-3-654-661

33. Teliya V. N. Russian phraseology: semantic, pragmatic and linguocultural aspects. Moscow: IaRK, 1996, 288. (In Russ.) https://www.elibrary.ru/sumhnj

34. Ternovaya L. O. Flowers and people. Moscow: Knorus, 2018, 188. (In Russ.)

35. Tolmacheva U. K. Flower symbolism in the everyday and festive culture of China. Analitika kulturologii, 2011, (2): 236–240. (In Russ.) https://www.elibrary.ru/qzcrhr

36. Trafimenkova T. A. The nominations of wild blooming plants as a fragment of the Russian linguistic picture of the world. Uchenye zapiski Orlovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriia: Gumanitarnye i sotsialnye nauki, 2011, (6): 260–267. (In Russ.) https://www.elibrary.ru/oulwxj

37. Shanskii N. M. Phraseology of the modern Russian language. 6th ed. Moscow: URSS, 2011, 265. (In Russ.) https://www.elibrary.ru/qwssyv

38. Shkatova V. V. Phraseological picture of the world as an object of linguistic studies. Vestnik Leningradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta imeni A. S. Pushkina, 2012, 7(1): 208–215. (In Russ.) https://www.elibrary.ru/pjtdsp

39. Shumbasova S. S. Flowers: The language of the English art or the art of the English language? RUDN Journal of language Studies, Semiotics and Semantics, 2016, (1): 52–58. (In Russ.) https://www.elibrary.ru/vpbczp

40. Yakovlev A. A. Language worldview as a linguistic notion: Review of recent Russian works. Vestniuk NSU. Series: Linguistics and Intercultural Communication, 2017, 15(2): 5–20. (In Russ.) https://www.elibrary.ru/yuabnl