Combined Tactics of Communication Strategy: Discrediting Biden’s Administration in Tucker Carlson Tonight

The speech-behavioral strategy of discrediting is a manipulative form of information aggression exerted on the consciousness of the mass audience. Since it is inherent in modern media, it affects politics and society and thus needs to be resisted. The article introduces an analysis of combined discrediting tactics that implement the communication strategy of discrediting against the President Biden’s administration. The corpus came from the Tucker Carlson Tonight show and included 563 contexts of combined discrediting tactics. Standard, statistical, and linguistic methods made it possible to classify the discrediting tactics into accusations, insults, negative predictions, deceived expectations, irony, polarization, and comparison. The resulting classification of combined tactics of discrediting included five quantitative groups and 51 content subgroups. The accusation tactics proved to be the most popular combined tactic (260 cases; 60 % of the corpus). Two-component tactics were the most representative (337; 60 %) whereas the subgroup of irony + insult was the most frequent in other subgroups (45; 8 %). Combined tactics had a more significant discrediting effect and a more intensive impact on the target audience.

1. Agrba L. A. Tactical and strategic repertoire of Vladislav Ardzinba. Political Linguistics, 2020, (5): 183–192. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26170/pl20-05-16

2. Vereshchagin E. M., Kostomarov V. G. Language and culture. Three linguistic and cultural concepts: Lexical background, speech-behavioral tactics, and sapienthemes. Moscow: Indrik, 2005, 1037. (In Russ.) https://www.elibrary.ru/sdwuyh

3. Gnezdilova L. B. Tactics of generalization as a way of a communicant’s evading a direct answer. Koncept, 2013, (12): 61–65. (In Russ.) https://www.elibrary.ru/rqqstd

4. Golovash L. B. Evading direct answer as a speech norm. Russian education in the 21st century: problems and prospects: All-Russian Sci.-Prac. Conf., Tomsk, 9–10 Nov 2006. Tomsk: TSU, 2006, 88–93. (In Russ.) https://www.elibrary.ru/sddkhn

5. Gunkova D. E. Discrediting strategy as a dominant of the discursive personality of an American political radio commentator. Discourse, 2020, 6(6): 113–125. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32603/2412-8562-2020-6-6-113-125

6. Dmitrieva M. I., Dubrovskaya V. V., Kolosova T. Yu. Manipulative strategies in political debates (based on J. Biden and D. Trump’s final presidential debates). Strategies and tactics in various registers of communication in modern Indo-European languages: Proc. II Intern. Sci. Conf., Nizhny Novgorod, 21–22 Dec 2021. Nizhny Novgorod: NSLU, 2022, 99–105. (In Russ.) https://www.elibrary.ru/rggsnu

7. Egorova E. N. The verbal aggression and the strategy of discrediting (analysis of newspaper publications). Language and Text, 2015, 2(3): 69–75. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17759/langt.2015020309

8. Issers O. S. Communicative strategies and tactics of Russian speech. 4th ed. Moscow: KomKniga, 2006, 284. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/ufgtvn

9. Kobenko Yu. V. Theoretical foundations of functional stylistics. Tomsk: TPU, 2019, 296. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/chvujo

10. Kraynova A. S. Systematization of experience in scientific describing of communicative strategies and communicative tactics in modern linguistic science. Uchenye zapiski Orlovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriia: Gumanitarnye i sotsialnye nauki, 2013, (1): 254–258. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/qjfkfj

11. Kultysheva I. V., Vishnyakova P. V. Information warfare against modern Russia (based on the articles about Russian swimmers published in American mass media). Speech influence in political discourse: Proc. Intern. Sci. Conf., Ekaterinburg, 1–3 Dec 2016. Ekaterinburg: USPU, 2016, 80–83. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/ykqhcf

12. Lisiutkina I. S. Some aspects of the discrediting strategy in Soviet media discourse (based on newspaper articles of the 1960–1979). Izvestiya of Saratov University. Philology. Journalism, 2019a, 19(2): 237–241. (In Russ.) https://www.elibrary.ru/elskwo

13. Lisyutkina I. S. Discrediting strategy in media political discourse: The national aspect. Proceedings of Voronezh State University. Series: Linguistics and Intercultural Communication, 2019b, (2): 20–27. (In Russ.) https://www.elibrary.ru/tvjgao

14. Ozyumenko V. I. Media discourse in an atmosphere of information warfare: From manipulation to aggression. Vestnik RUDN. Seriia: Lingvistika, 2017, 21(1): 203–220. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22363/2312-9182-2017-21-1-203-220

15. Parshina O. N. Strategies and tactics of speech behavior of the modern political elite of Russia. Astrakhan: ASTU, 2004, 195. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/qodpsn

16. Rogozhnikova T. P. Political texts of the early ХХ century: communicative-discursive features. Nauchnyi Dialog, 2019, (11): 61–71. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2019-11-61-71

17. Ruzhentseva N. B. Discrediting tactics and techniques in Russian political discourse. Ekaterinburg: USPU, 2004, 294. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/qcnxaz

18. Skovorodnikov A. P., Korolkova E. A. Speech tactics and language means of political information-psychological warfare in Russia: Ethical-pragmatic aspect (based on the material of the "Novaya Gazeta"). Political Linguistics, 2015, (3): 160–172. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/unfgyl

19. Tikhonova S. A., Perova E. A. Discreditation strategy as a means of creation of a negative image of Russia in British mass media discourse about the Tokyo Olympic Games. Political Linguistics, 2021, (5): 168–174. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26170/1999-2629_2021_05_19

20. Tretyakova V. S. Speech conflict and its research aspects. Legal Linguistics, 2004, (5): 112–120. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/vqhdwp

21. Khabekirova Z. S. Discredit strategy and ways of its realization in a political discourse of democratic opposition. Bulletin of Adyghe State University, Ser. 2: Philology and Art Criticisms, 2011, (2): 138–144. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/ococjx

22. Shiryaev N. S. Communicative strategies of self-identification of the Northern Irish (as presented in regional analytical blogs and news websites). Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State University, 2016, (7): 175–180. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/wlwsbz

23. Larina T., Ozyumenko V., Ponton M. D. Persuasion strategies in media discourse about Russia: Linguistic ambiguity and uncertainty. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics, 2020, 15(1): 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1515/lpp-2019-0002

24. Media effects: Advances in theory and research, eds. Jennings B., Zillman D., Oliver M. B. 2nd ed. NY: Routledge, 2002, 648. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410602428