Preview

SibScript

Advanced search

Duality in Language and Culture: Values and Meta-Concepts

https://doi.org/10.21603/sibscript-2024-26-1-37-48

Abstract

Texts of language and culture have a dual organization. The conceptual core contains the values experienced by a culture bearer while the periphery contains meta-concepts that belong to an outside observer. Such duality produces paired concepts of faith – religion, justice – law, hope – prospects, life – existence, etc. This article introduces a new interpretation of duality – not as a binary opposition, but as a semantically close chain of terms and meta-terms. The authors classified texts as those based on value-concepts, meta-concepts, and a mix of the experiences that belong to the culture bearer and the meta-concepts that belong to the observer. The resulting semiotic historical-genetic method makes it possible to detect cultural phenomena and build thematic semantic networks of language and culture that update the values. This leads to permitted and prohibited term usage. For instance, a Russian speaker cannot say I'm goggling because the action described by predicate can be evaluated only by an outside observer. However, one can say he's goggling because this cognitive scenario presupposes an outside observer. Such taboos are associated with terms and meta-terms.

About the Authors

Sergey G. Proskurin
Novosibirsk National Research State University; Novosibirsk State Technical University
Russian Federation

Scopus Author ID: 36864449900

Novosibirsk


Competing Interests:

The authors declared no potential conflict of interests regarding the research, authorship, and / or publication of this article.



Anna V. Proskurina
Novosibirsk State Technical University
Russian Federation

Scopus Author ID: 57204811594

Novosibirsk


Competing Interests:

The authors declared no potential conflict of interests regarding the research, authorship, and / or publication of this article.



References

1. Descartes R. Reasoning about the method. St. Petersburg: Azbuka-Attikus, 2022, 320. (In Russ.)

2. Ivanov V. V., Toporov V. N. Research in the field of Slavic antiquities: Lexical and phraseological issues of text reconstruction. Moscow: Nauka, 1974, 342. (In Russ.) https://www.elibrary.ru/uftqfj

3. Kazakov G. A. Lexical aspects of Russian Bible translations. Nauchnyi Dialog, 2021, (6): 59–77. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2021-6-59-77

4. Kazakov G. A. Religion and language in post-Soviet Russia: A view from the other side of the ocean. Lomonosov Linguistics and Intercultural Communication Journal, 2013, (4): 172–175. (In Russ.) https://www.elibrary.ru/rpxzlx

5. Kirsberg I. V. Phenomenology in Religious Studies: What Can It Be? A study of religion as mere consciousness. Moscow: Progress-Traditsiia, 2016, 304. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/zuwvwj

6. Kolesov I. Yu. Problems of conceptualization and linguistic representation of visual perception. Barnaul: AltSPU, 2008, 354. (In Russ.) https://www.elibrary.ru/qufkvr

7. Krasukhin K. G. The relations between synchrony and diachrony by Ferdinand de Saussure. Kritika i Semiotika, 2017, (1): 69–80. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/zqkunz

8. Kuße H. Cultural linguistics. Moscow: Gnozis, 2022, 536. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/uxiezn

9. Lèvi-Strauss C. Structural anthropology. Moscow: Nauka, 1985, 536 (In Russ.)

10. Lèvi-Strauss C. Totemism today. Untamed Thought. Moscow: Akad. proekt, 2008. 520. (In Russ.)

11. Leach E. Culture and communication: The logic by which symbols are connected. An introduction to the use of structuralist analysis in social anthropology. Moscow: Vost. lit., 2001, 142. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/rjkszy

12. Popper K. All life is problem solving: knowledge, history and politics. Part 1. Questions of knowledge of nature. Moscow: URSS; LENAND, 2019, 200. (In Russ.)

13. Proskurin S. G. Thematic Network of Language and Culture. Kritika i Semiotika, 2010, (14): 335–353. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/towqax

14. Proskurina A. V. The concept of body and soul in the Old English tradition. Kritika i Semiotika, 2020, (2): 237–255. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25205/2307-1737-2020-2-237-255

15. Radbil T. B., Akhmetzhanova G. A., Zhumagulova Zh. Zh., Seralieva A. E., Seralieva G. E. DUSHA ("SOUL") and TELO ("BODY") in the aspect of contrastive analysis of cultural concepts: Materials for the linguo-cultorological phraseological dictionary of Russian-Kazakh correlations. Nauchnyi Dialog, 2020, (3): 127–150. (In Russ) https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2020-3-127-150

16. Radbil T. B., Saygin V. V. The concept "Grekh" ("Sin") in the context of the lexicographic description of key concepts of Russian culture. Voprosy Leksikografii, 2019, (15): 36–59. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17223/22274200/15/3

17. Semenov Yu. I. Introduction to the science of philosophy. Book 3. Marxist breakthrough in philosophy. Moscow: Lenand; URSS, 2017, 232. (In Russ.)

18. Semenov Yu. I. How did humanity originate. 2nd ed. Moscow: GPIB, 2002, 790. (In Russ.)

19. Semenov Yu. I. The origin and development of religion, mythology, theology, and religious philosophy: A brief theoretical essay. Moscow: LENAND, 2022, 200. (In Russ.)

20. Stepanov Yu. S. Words, Concepts, and Things. Towards a new synthesis in the science of culture. In: Benveniste É. Dictionary of Indo-European social terms. Moscow: Progress-Univers, 1995, 5–26. (In Russ.)

21. Stepanov Yu. S., Proskurin S. G. Constants of world culture. Alphabet and alphabetic texts in the period of dual faith. Moscow: Nauka, 1993, 158. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/tsthfl

22. Tolstoy N. I. Binary oppositions right – left, male – female. Cultural languages and problems of translatability, ed. Uspensky B. A. Moscow: Nauka, 1987, 169–183. (In Russ.) https://www.elibrary.ru/wlotvr

23. Toporov V. N. Mythopoetic world model. Myths of the world, ed. Tokarev S. A. 2nd ed. Moscow: Sov. Entsikl., 1988, 161–164. (In Russ.)

24. Heidegger M. Works and thoughts of different years. Moscow: Gnozis, 1993, 464. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/xgmrqz

25. Austin J. L. How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1962, 174.

26. Grimm J. Deutsche Mythologie. Göttingen: Dieterich, 1844, 1246.

27. Traditional India: Strukture and change, ed. Singer M. Philadelphia: American Folklore Society, 1959, 332.

28. Wierzbicka A. Semantics, culture and cognition. Universal human concepts in culture-specific configurations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992, 487.

29. Wulf C. Anthropology. A continental perspective. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 2013, 408.


Review

For citations:


Proskurin S.G., Proskurina A.V. Duality in Language and Culture: Values and Meta-Concepts. SibScript. 2024;26(1):37-48. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21603/sibscript-2024-26-1-37-48

Views: 388


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2949-2122 (Print)
ISSN 2949-2092 (Online)