Neolithic Liner Dagger from Ust-Narym in the Irtysh River Valley
https://doi.org/10.21603/sibscript-2023-25-6-735-748
Abstract
The present research featured a slotted, or liner, bone dagger from the Neolithic layer of the Ust-Narym settlement on the Irtysh River. Its design, material processing technology, and functional purpose make it a rare, as well as the most ancient example of hand-to-hand combat weapons found in Kazakhstan. This composite object was carved from the posterior left metatarsal bone of a wild auroch with the help of several tools. It includes thin and sharp flint inserts, which were attached into the grooves on the side faces of the dagger frame with a special adhesive substance. An additional nozzle for a short handle made it possible to use this piercing-cutting weapon in battle. It is decorated with dots and circles connected by straight lines, which probably means it was a socialized object of ritual use associated with sacrifice. Typologically, the dagger from Ust-Narym is similar to artifacts found in the Late Paleolithic and Mesolithic sites in the south of Western Siberia, in the Urals, in the Baikal region, and in Eastern Europe. The dagger marks a milestone in the technical and technological development of ancient Eurasian peoples. It also illustrates the ethno-social and cultural processes across the vast territory of Eurasia.
About the Author
Zainolla S. Samashev
A.Kh. Margulan Institute of Archaeology; Almaty Al Farabi Kazakh National University
Kazakhstan
Competing Interests:
Kazakhstan
Scopus Author ID: 57110326000
Almaty
Competing Interests:
The author declared no potential conflict of interests regarding the research, authorship, and / or publication of this article.
References
1. Akimova E. V., Vdovin A. S., Makarov N. P. Liner tools of the Krasnoyarsk archaeological region. Ancient Artifacts from The Yenissei River Valley in Siberia, ed. Vdovin A. S. Krasnoyarsk: KSU, 1996, iss. 1, 62–82. (In Russ.) https://www.elibrary.ru/wfwlrr
2. Borodkin Yu. M. Neolithic burial at the village of Vaskovo. Materials from a Neolithic burial near the village Vaskovo. News of the laboratory of archaeological research, ed. Martynov A. I. Kemerovo: Kem. kn. izd-vo, 1967, iss. 1, 101–107. (In Russ.) https://www.elibrary.ru/zeycbn
3. Vasiliev I. B., Sinyuk A. T. Eneolithic East-European forest-steppe: origin and periodization of cultures. Kuibyshev: KSPI, 1985, 118. (In Russ.)
4. Volkov V. V. Burial ground in Norovlin Uula (Mongolia). Archaeology of North and Central Asia, eds. Okladnikov A. P., Derevyanko A. P. Novosibirsk: Nauka. Sib. otd-ie, 1975, 76–79. (In Russ.) https://www.elibrary.ru/yvcmef
5. Ginzburg V. V. Anthropological characteristic of the population of Kazakhstan in the Bronze Age. Proceedings of the Institute of History, Archaeology, and Ethnography. Vol. 1. Archaeology. Alma-Ata: AS Kazakh SSR, 1956, 159–171. (In Russ.)
6. Grebenyukov V. I. Archaeological studies of the Neolithic and Chalcolithic age in Eastern and Central Kazakhstan (50s–60s of the 20th century). Bulletin of Nizhnevartovsk State University, 2015, (4): 60–66. (In Russ.) https://www.elibrary.ru/unjofd
7. Gurina N. N. Oleneostrovsky burial ground. Moscow-Leningrad: Nauka, 1956, 432. (In Russ.)
8. Dubyagin P. S., Chikrizov F. D., Churinov V. A., Vasiliev I. B., Vybornov A. A. New Neolithic bronze from the Northern Caspian. Volga-Ural steppe, and forest-steppe in the Early Metal Era, ed. Merpert N. Ya. Kuibyshev: KSPI, 1982, vol. 263, 95–134. (In Russ.) https://www.elibrary.ru/uxpjtn
9. Zhilin M. G. Mesolithic bone industry of the forest zone of Eastern Europe. Moscow: URSS, 2001, 328. (In Russ.) https://www.elibrary.ru/pdfkrf
10. Zhilin M. G. Functional classification of bone and antler weapons in the Mesolithic of the forest zone of Eastern Europe. Moscow: IA RAS, 2021, 180. (In Russ.) https://www.elibrary.ru/pfymrx
11. Zakharov S. V., Merts V. K., Bychkov V. S. Protective excavations of the burial mounds of Mayskoe V: preliminary results. Mir Bolshogo Altaia, 2020, 6(3): 983–1000. (In Russ.) https://www.elibrary.ru/wdiiau
12. Ineshin E. M., Klementiev A. N., Martynovich N. V., Turner-II K. J, Tetenkin A. V., Khenzykhenova F. I. Problems and questions methodology of the zooarchaeological researches of the Bolshoy Yakor 1. Izvestiya Laboratorii drevnikh tekhnologii, 2004, (1): 49–86. (In Russ.) https://www.elibrary.ru/vyxfyr
13. History of Sibiria. Vol. 1. Stone and Bronze Age, ed. Shunkov M. V. Novosibirsk: IAET SB RAS, 2022, 660. (In Russ.) https://www.elibrary.ru/aqygxu
14. Kiryushin Yu. F., Kungurova N. Yu., Kadikov B. Kh. The oldest burial grounds of the northern foothills of Altai. Barnaul: AltSU, 2000, 117. (In Russ.) https://www.elibrary.ru/vabqkb
15. Korobkova G. F. Labor tools and economy of Neolithic tribes of Central Asia. Leningrad: Nauka, 1969, 216. (In Russ.)
16. Korobkova G. F. Functions of stone implements from Ust-Narym. New methods in archaeological research, ed. Rudenko S. I. Moscow-Leningrad: AS USSR, 1963, 215–233. (In Russ.)
17. Kungurova N. Yu. Solontsy 5 burial ground. Culture of buried Neolithic Altai. Barnaul: BLI MIA of Russia, 2005, 128. (In Russ.) https://www.elibrary.ru/qpaopj
18. Logvin A. V., Shevnina I. V. Production aspects of life activity of the Makhanjar population. History of the Homeland, 2007, (3): 174–185. (In Russ.)
19. Markin S. V. Neolithic burial of Northwestern Altai. Archaeology, Ethnology and Anthropology of Eurasia, 2000, (2): 53–64. (In Russ.) https://www.elibrary.ru/tgvevx
20. Matyushin G. N. Mesolithic of the Southern Urals. Moscow: Nauka, 1976, 368. (In Russ.) https://www.elibrary.ru/wxunht
21. Merts V. K. New materials on Neolithic Age in North-Eastern Kazakhstan. Archaeology of Independent Kazakhstan: results and prospects: Intern. Sci. Conf., Almaty, 12–15 Dec 2011. Almaty: Khikari, vol, I, 178–186. (In Russ.) https://www.elibrary.ru/xxudgt
22. Merts V. K. Origin of complexes of Transbaikal type in Eneolithic Kazakhstan. Paleodemography migration processes in Western Siberia: from ancient times to the Middle Ages: Intern. Sci. Conf., Barnaul, 12–13 Apr 1994. Barnaul: AltSU, 1994, 39–42. (In Russ.) https://www.elibrary.ru/vezskl
23. Molodin V. I. Sopka-2 site on the Om river bank. Vol. 1. The cultural-chronological analysis of the burial sites belonging to the Neolitic and Early Metal Periods. Novosibirsk: IAET SB RAS, 2001, 128. (In Russ.) https://www.elibrary.ru/pdgjgh
24. Mosin V. S. History of the Southern Urals. Vol. 1. Southern Urals in the Stone Age. Chelyabinsk: PC SUSU, 2019, 408. (In Russ.) https://www.elibrary.ru/rgsosf
25. Nokhrina T. I., Chekha A. N. Bone liner dagger from the Biyka 1 Cave in Gorny Altai. Problems of Archaeology, Ethnography, Anthropology of Siberia and Neighboring Territories, 2013, 19: 135–138. (In Russ.) https://www.elibrary.ru/rrtkth
26. Okladnikov A. P. Neolithic and Bronze Age of Baikal region. Historical and archaeological research. Pt. I–II. 1950–1955. Moscow-Leningrad: AS USSR, 1950, 412. (In Russ.)
27. Petrin V. T. Excavations of the Late Paleolithic site Chernoozerie II on the Middle Irtysh. From the History of Siberia. Iss. 15. Materials on archeology of Western Siberia, eds. Gening V. F., Matyushchenko V. I. Tomsk: TSU, 1974, 13–17. (In Russ.) https://www.elibrary.ru/wfucpp
28. Salnikov K. V. To the question about the Neolithic of the steppe Trans-Urals. Kratkie soobshcheniia Instituta istorii materialnoi kultury, 1952, (47): 15–23. (In Russ.)
29. Solodovnikov K. N., Bagashev A. N., Tur S. S., Gromov A. V., Nechvaloda A. I., Kravchenko G. G. Neolithic-Eneolithic paleoanthropological sources from the Middle Irtysh area. Vestnik Arheologii, Antropologii i Etnografii, 2019, (3): 116–136. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20874/2071-0437-2019-46-3-116-136
30. Sorokin A. N. Settlement and burial site Minino 2 in the Moscow Region: bone and antler tools. Moscow: IA RAS, 2013, 448. (In Russ.) https://www.elibrary.ru/sxnzih
31. Chernikov S. S. East Kazakhstan expedition of 1950. Kratkie soobshcheniia Instituta istorii materialnoi kultury, 1952, (48): 81–92. (In Russ.)
32. Chernikov S. S. East Kazakhstan in the Neolithic and Bronze Age: results of archeological studies. Dr. Hist. Sci. Diss. Abstr. Moscow, 1970, 60. (In Russ.)
33. Chernikov S. S. The East Kazakhstan expedition. Kratkie soobshcheniia Instituta istorii materialnoi kultury, 1956, (64): 43–60. (In Russ.)
34. Chernikov S. S. The East Kazakhstan archeological expedition in 1956. Kratkie soobshcheniia Instituta istorii materialnoi kultury, 1959, (73): 99–106. (In Russ.)
35. Schmidt I. V. Rhombic signs from Chernoozerye II and Pegan: ornamental invariants? Attempt to justify and localize the style. Kratkiye Soobshcheniya Instituta Arkheologii, 2022, 267: 345–363. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25681/IARAS.0130-2620.267.345-363
36. Yablonsky L. T. Face restoration based on a human skull from Shiderty 3 archeological site and the problem of early race genesis in Kazakhstan. Archeological sites of Pavlodar Irtysh River region, ed. Merts V. K. Pavlodar: Eko, 2002, 44–63. (In Russ.)
37. Manninen M. A., Asheichyk V., Jonuks T., Kriiska A., Osipowicz G., Sorokin A. N., Vashanau A., Riede F., Persson P. Using radiocarbon dates and tool design principles to assess the role of composite slotted bone tool technology at the intersection of adaptation and culture-history. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 2021, 28(2): 845–870. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10816-021-09517-7
Review
For citations:
Samashev Z.S. Neolithic Liner Dagger from Ust-Narym in the Irtysh River Valley. SibScript. 2023;25(6):735-748. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21603/sibscript-2023-25-6-735-748
Views:
343
Email this article 