Positive Business Communication: Means of Harmonizing Communication in Commercial Group Chats
https://doi.org/10.21603/sibscript-2023-25-4-461-470
Abstract
Internet communication and its genres are one of the most relevant issues of modern linguistics. Genres of Internet communication are in constant development. Internet chats started as a platform of phatic communication that provided leisure activities. These days, group chats serve a lot of purposes. For instance, commercial group chats are aimed at online buying and selling. This research focused on two Viber commercial chats that united women-customers and sellers from the city of Saratov (2021–2023). The discursive analysis revealed conflict-free environment, which is not typical of phatic chats, where anonymity usually contributes to the violation of communication and ethical standards. The authors identified the means of harmonizing communication that communicants resorted to for effective interaction. The participants created a benevolent atmosphere by using hypocoristic proper names, emoticons, complementarity, etc. Etiquette genres of greetings, gratitude, compliments, congratulations, and wishes resulted in a balanced communication. Tactics of conflict prevention included solidarity, mitigation, e.g., diminutives, reminders, concern for the addressee, assessment, courtesy, humor, etc. The resulting communicative attraction contributed to effective communication between sellers and buyers. The positive communication experience in such chats may improve the real communication.
About the Authors
Alla N. BaikulovaRussian Federation
Saratov
Scopus Author ID: 57807701100
Competing Interests:
The authors declared no potential conflict of interests regarding the research, authorship, and / or publication of this article.
Margarita A. Kormilitsyna
Russian Federation
Saratov
Scopus Author ID: 57219698371
Competing Interests:
The authors declared no potential conflict of interests regarding the research, authorship, and / or publication of this article.
References
1. Andreeva S. V., Baikulova A. N., Bots T. S., Viktorova E. Yu., Voronovskaya I. A., Gvozdyuk A. A., Degaltseva A. V., Kiselnikova A. A., Kormilitsyna M. A., Makeeva E. P., Matyashevskaya A. I., Milekhina T. A., Myaksheva O. V., Neznaeva O. S., Nickitina O. V., Sirotinina O. B., Tyrnikova N. G., Uzdinskaya E. V. Communication efficiency: effect of communication spheres on the factors for its achievement. Saratov: Nauka, 2021, 256. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/pmvpeb
2. Andreeva S. V., Baikulova A. N., Viktorova E. Yu., Voronovskaya I. A., Degaltseva A. V., Kormilitsyna M. A., Kulikova G. S., Lvova O. S., Matyashevskaya A. I., Milekhina T. A., Myaksheva O. V., Navasartyan L. G., Sandzhi-Garyaeva Z. S., Sirotinina O. B., Uzdinskaya E. V., Sirotinina O. B., Elina E. A., Risinzon S. A. Efficiency of communication: concept, participants, and methods. Saratov: Nauka, 2019, 236. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/jalsod
3. Antipov A. G., Krasnova I. V. Chat-communication in normative ethics aspect. Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta kultury i iskusstv, 2012, (19-1): 10–16. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/oxsmrf
4. Baikulova A. N. Hous chat as an urban communication practice: forming the mentality of a responsible property owner. Languages and cultures in the digital age: Proc. Intern. Sci. Conf., Nizhniy Novgorod, 28–30 Oct 2022. Nizhniy Novgorod: Lobachevsky State University of Nizhni Novgorod, 2022, 17–24 (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/glmfxb
5. Baikulova A. N., Viktorova E. Yu., Degaltseva A. V., Degaltseva M. N., Kormilitsyna M. A., Kulikova G. S., Matyashevskaya A. I., Milekhina T. A., Sirotinina O. B., Uzdinskaya E. V., Yakhina D. I. The riskiness of modern communication and the role of communicative competence in overcoming. Saratov: SSU, 2016, 188. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/obnskr
6. Bergelson M. B. Language aspects of virtual communication. Lomonosov Linguistics and Intercultural Communication Journal, 2002, (1): 55–67. (In Russ.)
7. Valiakhmetova D. R. Written colloquial speech in the context of the peculiarities of Internet discourse. Baudouin Readings: Baudouin de Courtenay and Modern Linguistics: Proc. Intern. Conf., Kazan, 11–13 Dec 2001. Kazan: Kazan University, 2001, vol. 2, 7–9. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/pvcijx
8. Vinogradova T. Iu. Specificity of communication on the Internet. Russian and Comparative Philology: Cultural Linguistics, ed. Andramonova N. A. Kazan: Kazan University, 2004, 63–67. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/vlvayh
9. Vodyanova N. V. Personal self-realization in the Internet space in the context of communicative anthropology. Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State University, 2009, (11): 57–62. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/kkxvgj
10. Gladyshev V. I. Compensational communication: social-philosophical analysis. Ekaterinburg: Bank kulturnoi informatsii, 1999, 292. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/vmznhv
11. Zhelvis V. I. Battlefield. Foul language as a social problem in the languages and cultures of the world. Moscow: Ladomir, 1997, 328. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/vrlohj
12. Zavyalova Z. S., Tikhonova G. Yu. Interactive chat as a special form of being and personality representations: Russian Discourse. Vestnik nauki Sibiri, 2015, (2): 244–250. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/ulxpfp
13. Kalinina M. A. The genre of invective in public discourse. LUNN Bulletin, 2020, (S): 153–163. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.47388/2072-3490/lunn2020-si-153-163
14. Kolokoltseva T. N. Dialogism in the genres of internet communication (chat, forum, blog). Zanry Reci, 2016, (2): 96–104. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18500/2311-0740-2016-2-14-97-105
15. Kolokoltseva T. N. Internet-communication as the mirror of the main tendencies of development and functioning of the Russian language. Grani poznaniia, 2011, (4): 13–17. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/rbsncx
16. Kormilitsyna M. A. Definition of the concept: performance criteria. In: Andreeva S. V., Baikulova A. N., Viktorova E. Yu., Voronovskaya I. A., Degaltseva A. V., Kormilitsyna M. A., Kulikova G. S., Lvova O. S., Matyashevskaya A. I., Milekhina T. A., Myaksheva O. V., Navasartyan L. G., Sandzhi-Garyaeva Z. S., Sirotinina O. B., Uzdinskaya E. V., Sirotinina O. B., Elina E. A., Risinzon S. A. Efficiency of communication: concept, participants, and methods. Saratov: Nauka, 2019, 6–15. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/ntzenw
17. Kuznetsov A. V. Written colloquial speech in online communication. Molodoi uchenyi, 2011, (3-2): 24–26. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/nuegkl
18. Leontovich O. A., Gulyaeva M. A., Luneva O. V., Sokolova M. S. Positive communication. Moscow: Gnosis, 2020, 296. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/ekmdfz
19. Nikolaeva A. V. Internet text as a new type of communication. Russkaya Rech, 2016, (3): 46–50. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/vzsqoz
20. Podgornaya E. A., Demidenko K. A. Linguistic characteristics of Internet chat as a type of communication. Koncept, 2014, (9): 136–140. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/snytnr
21. Prokophieva N. A. Destructive phatic speech behavior in social media: towards problem statement. Mediaskop, 2019, (4). (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30547/mediascope.4.2019.6
22. Semyonkina I. A. General trends in the development of language in computer-mediated communication based on the material of English-speaking and Russian-speaking chats. Scientific notes of the Ulyanovsk State University "Relevant Issues of Language Theory and Linguistic Didactics". Linguistics, ed. Fefilov A. I. Ulyanovsk: UlSU, 2019, 37–40. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/duikaw
23. Sergeeva D. A. Chat speech and its subject. Filologiya i chelovek, 2008, (4), 137–142. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/kvaold
24. Sirotinina O. B. Colloquial speech, colloquiality, and colloquial type of speech culture. Language faces. To the 45th anniversary of scientific activities of E. A. Zemskaya, ed. Glovinskaya M. Ya. Moscow: Nasledie, 1998, 348–353. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/pyxaod
25. Sirotinina O. B. Russian language: system, usage, and risks. Saratov: SSU, 2013, 116 с. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/ykyglt
26. Sternin I. A. Introduction to speech exposure. Voronezh: Poligraf, 2001, 252. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/qxoqup
27. Sternin I. A. About the concept of "effective communication". Teaching a culture of communication in high school. Experience. Didactic materials, ed. Sternin I. A. Voronezh: VOIPKiPRO, 1995, 5–9. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/wncgqf
28. Chuchkova G. S. Man in the communicative space of the Internet. Vestnik Altayskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta, 2004, (3): 384–387. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/pdtkur
29. Shalina I. V. Communicative-speech disharmony: causes and types. Cultural and speech situation in modern Russia, ed. Kupina N. A. Ekaterinburg: Ural University, 2000, 272–287. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/rrpbdb
30. Sharipova V. A., Elinson M. A., Ickhakova O. S. Internet communication. New opportunities and methods of mediated communication or language degradation. Bulletin of the Bashkir University, 2019, 24(1): 210–214. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/vyueiu
31. Shiryaev E. N. Types of norms and the question of cultural and speech assessments. Cultural and speech situation in modern Russia, ed. Kupina N. A. Ekaterinburg: Ural University, 2000, 13–21. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/rrpbdb
32. Yuzhaninova E. R. Online communication as a way of self-realization. Theory and Practice of Social Development, 2013, (5): 25–28. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/qaskel
33. Bernes-Lee T. Weaving the Web: The original design and ultimate destiny of the World Wide Web by its inventor. San Francisco: Harper, 1999, 226.
Review
For citations:
Baikulova A.N., Kormilitsyna M.A. Positive Business Communication: Means of Harmonizing Communication in Commercial Group Chats. SibScript. 2023;25(4):461-470. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21603/sibscript-2023-25-4-461-470