Buddhist Baron R. Ungern von Sternberg and the Right-Wing Literature
https://doi.org/10.21603/sibscript-2023-25-1-128-135
Abstract
The article describes the way Russian right-wing literature reflected the Buddhist component of the image of Baron R. Ungern von Sternberg. The author used the interpretive and comparative methods to study the works by E. Limonov, A. Dugin, and L. Prozorov, as well as poets and essayists from the Black Corps Almanac published by the Brotherhood of St. Rev. Joseph Volotsky. Each of these authors had their own perception of R. Ungern’s image, but he remained a symbol of struggle against the wrong world order. For E. Limonov and A. Shiropaev, he was an anti-Western, anti-bourgeois, and revolutionary-minded warrior who became Mahagala, a Mongol-Buddhist god of war. For A. Dugin, he was a universal Pratyekabuddhayāna who was to bring a purifying destruction upon the world as a forerunner of Bodhisattva Maitreya. For the team of the Black Corps Almanac, he was a Buddhism-related Christian warrior who opposed the red ideology. For L. Prozorov, R. Ungern was a demonic mystical being who chose fascism as a means to conquer the world but thought himself equal to Buddha and Christ. In all these cases, the image of Baron R. Ungern existed in a high stylistic register while his real biography and religious issues faded into the background, overshadowed by his symbolism. As a result, Baron R. Ungern turned into a principle that still inspires the modern right-wing, Eurasian, and traditionalist idea.
References
1. Alekseev P. V. Muslim East in the literature of Russian Romanticism of the 1820s–1830s. Gorno-Altaisk: GASU, 2014, 188. (In Russ.)
2. Androsov V. P. Shakyamuni Buddha and Indian Buddhism. Modern interpretation of ancient texts. Moscow: Vost. lit., 2001, 508. (In Russ.)
3. Antsiferov N. P. The Soul of St. Petersburg . Moscow: Bertelsmann Media Moscow (BMM), 2014, 400. (In Russ.)
4. Bekmetov R. F. Russian literature and the Buddhist-Taoist East (problems of dialogue) . Kazan: Shkola, 2018, 328. (In Russ.)
5. Bogumil T. A. Defining the Altai text and Altai literature. Filologiya i chelovek , 2017, (4): 155–164. (In Russ.)
6. Dubakov L. V. Baron Ungern in the literature of the 1920s: the two-sided optics of the Civil War. Izvestiya RAN. Seriya literatury i yazyka, 2022a, 81 (2): 48–53. (In Russ.)
7. Dubakov L. V. Concepts of Buddhist emptiness and illusory in L. A. Yuzefovich's novel "Prince of the Wind". Vestnik Udmurtskogo universiteta. Seriya Istoriya i filologiya, 2022b, 32 (5): 1085–1092. (In Russ.)
8. Dyabkin I. A. Far Eastern mythologems of the Civil War: heroes and images. Losev Readings 2010 : Proc. Region. Sci.-Prac. Conf., Blagoveshchensk, 26 Mar 2010. Blagoveshchensk: BSPU, 2010, iss. 3, 66–75. (In Russ.)
9. Dyabkin I. A. Mythologization of history in the works by Arseny Nesmelov. Russia and China on the Far Eastern borders: from confrontation to cooperation : Sci. schools and Intern. Sci. Conf., Blagoveshchensk, 14–21 Sep 2009. Blagoveshchensk: ASU, 2009, iss. 8, 426–433. (In Russ.)
10. Dyabkin I. A. Letters of Baron R. F. Ungern-von-Sternberg (the religious, philosophical and political views of Baron Ungern). Religiovedenie, 2012, (1): 172–184. (In Russ.)
11. Dyabkin I. A. Folklore image of the heroes of the Civil War as a source of literary mythologization in the Far Eastern folklore of the 1920s–1930s. Losev readings-2011 : Proc. Region. Sci.-Prac. Conf., Blagoveshchensk, 29 Mar 2011. Blagoveshchensk: BSPU, 2011, 189–200. (In Russ.)
12. Zabiyako A. A., Dyabkin I. A. Neomythological intentions in the early work of Arseny Nesmelov. Russian Harbin verbalized , ed. Zabiyako A. A., Efendieva G. V. Blagoveshchensk: ASU, 2009, iss. 3, 65–74. (In Russ.)
13. Lotman Yu. M. The structure of a literary text. In: Lotman Yu. M. About art. St. Petersburg: Iskusstvo-SPB, 1998, 14–285. (In Russ.)
14. Lotman Yu. M., Uspenskiy B. A. Echoes of the concept of Moscow as the Third Rome in the ideology of Peter the Great: medieval tradition in baroque culture. The Artistic language of the Middle Ages, ed. Karpushin V. A. Moscow: Nauka, 1982, 236–249. (In Russ.)
15. Lyusy A. P. The Crimean text in Russian literature: history and the present. Vestnik of Moscow State Linguistic University. Humanities, 2016, (11): 161–171. (In Russ.)
16. Mann Yu. V. Moscow in Gogol's creative consciousness. Moscow and the Moscow text of Russian culture , ed. Knabe G. S. Moscow: RSUH, 1998, 63–81. (In Russ.)
17. Mednis N. E. Venice in Russian literature. Novosibirsk: NSU, 1999, 392. (In Russ.)
18. Mikhalev A. V. God of War or the Memory of the "Black Baron" in the right discourse of contemporary Russia. Political science (RU), 2018, (3): 129–146. (In Russ.)
19. Sidorov S. A. Buddhism: history, canons, and culture. Moscow: Dizaiin. Informatsiia. Kartografiia; Astrel; AST, 2005, 487. (In Russ.)
20. Sorokina T. E. Artistic formation of the national and historical archetype of the Russian World in modern prose. Rostov-on-Don: AkademLit TM, 2018, 222. (In Russ.)
21. Strelkov A. M., Torchinov E. A., Mongush M. V., Ryabov S. V. Buddhism. Canons. History. Art. Moscow: Dizaiin. Informatsiia. Kartografiia, 2006, 600. (In Russ.)
22. Toporov V. N. Petersburg and the Petersburg text in Russian literature: introduction. In: Toporov V. N. Myth. Ritual. Symbol. Image: a mythopoetic study. Selected works . Moscow: Progress-Kultura, 1995, 259–367. (In Russ.)
23. Torchinov E. A. Introduction to Buddhology: a course of lectures. St. Petersburg: Akad. proekt, 2000, 334. (In Russ.)
24. Tyupa V. I. Siberia mythology: to the question of the "Siberian text" of Russian literature. Sibirskii Filologicheskii Zhurnal, 2002, (1): 27–35. (In Russ.)
25. Ulanov M. S. Baron Ungern and Buddhism. Buddhist culture: history, source studies, linguistics, and art : 2nd Dorzhiev readings, St. Petersburg, 9–11 Nov 2006. St. Petersburg: Peterb. vostokovedenie, 2008, 31–36. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Dubakov L.V. Buddhist Baron R. Ungern von Sternberg and the Right-Wing Literature. SibScript. 2023;25(1):128-135. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21603/sibscript-2023-25-1-128-135