Preview

SibScript

Advanced search

Speech Genre of Congratulation in Asymmetric Communication

https://doi.org/10.21603/sibscript-2023-25-1-55-65

Abstract

The article describes the pragmatic, semantic, and axiological features of the speech genre of congratulation complement in pedagogical discourse with asymmetric communicants. The research material included 170 fragments. The research revealed two groups based on semantic, axiological, pragmatic, and linguistic differences: personal informal internet congratulations made by teaching staff to students and formal public speeches given by university rectors and teaching staff to students published on official websites of universities. The analysis relied on the factor of formality / informality. The differences between formal and informal congratulations manifested themselves in the content, language, and tactics. Both types were detailed and poly-intentional. The informal congratulations touched upon the addressee's personality, hobbies, achievements, and character traits. The formal congratulations showed a much greater distance between the sender and the addressee. They focused on the addressee's status, not personality. The texts often reflected current events, e.g., in 2019–2020 they touched upon the COVID-2019 pandemic.

About the Author

Elena N. Malashenkova
Saratov State University
Russian Federation

Competing Interests:

The author declared no potential conflicts of interests regarding the research, authorship, and / or publication of this article.



References

1. Agarkova O. A., Putilina L. V. Speech act of wish in modern communication space. Mir nauki, kul'tury, obrazovaniya, 2022, (2): 368–370. (In Russ.)

2. Anisimova T. V., Gimpelson E. G. Praise to praise, or the Meaning and features of epideictic speech. Vestnik Doma uchenykh Khaify, 2020, 45: 51–60. (In Russ.)

3. Baikulova A. N. Oral informal communication and its varieties: everyday speech of citizens . Saratov: Nauka, 2014, 216. (In Russ.)

4. Vdovina E. V. The label nomination "congratulation complement" as a concept. Tenth Ephraim Readings The Concept of a Modern Worldview : Proc. 10th Intern. Sci. Conf., St. Petersburg, 21 Apr 2007. St. Petersburg: LEMA, 2007, 84–88. (In Russ.)

5. Gladrov V., Kotorova E. G. Models of speech behavior in German and Russian communicative culture. Moscow: IaSK, 2021, 472. (In Russ.)

6. Glovinskaya M. Ya. Semantics of verbs of speech from the point of view of the theory of speech acts. Russian language in its functioning, eds. Zemskaya E. A., Shmelev D. N. Moscow: Nauka, 1993, 158–218. (In Russ.)

7. Gonchar M. S. A wish and a compliment as speech tactics of strategy politeness in Russian speech of Chinese, Korean and Japanese people. Modern Science: actual problems of theory and practice. Series: Humanities , 2018, (5): 108–110. (In Russ.)

8. Gusarenko M. K. Propositional content and referential characteristics of optatives-wishes in colloquial everyday discourse. Philology. Theory & Practice, 2014, (5-2): 63–66. (In Russ.)

9. Dementyev V. V., Sedov K. F. A sociopragmatic aspect of speech genres theory. Saratov: SGU, 1998, 107. (In Russ.)

10. Dobrokhodova O. V. Conceptualization of social status in English. Cognitive studies of language, 2010, (6): 132–135. (In Russ.)

11. Duskaeva L. R., Kornilova N. A. Etiquette speech genres in media discourse. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Rossiyskaya i zarubezhnaya filologiya , 2012, (3): 177–185. (In Russ.)

12. Zavershynskaya I. K. Speech genre of wish and advertisement. Lingvokulturologiia, 2008, (2): 107−114. (In Russ.)

13. Kazakova O. A. Ritual genres as a reflection of national strategies of speech behavior of a linguistic personality. Vestnik nauki Sibir, 2011, (1): 611−616. (In Russ.)

14. Karasik V. I. Types of discourse. Linguistic personality: institutional and personal discourse , eds. Karasik V. I., Slyshkin G. G. Volgograd: Peremena, 2000, 5–20. (In Russ.)

15. Kitaigorodskaia M. V., Rozanova N. N. Speech of Moscow residents: communicative and cultural aspect. Moscow: Russkie slovari, 1999, 396. (In Russ.)

16. Komorova D. F. Social characteristics of communicants and their influence on the speech act of congratulations: social status and social distance. Foreign language and foreign language culture in education: trends, problems, and solutions : Proc. III All-Russian Sci.-Method. Conf., Tomsk, 28–30 Apr 2004. Tomsk, Veter, 2004, 41–46. (In Russ.)

17. Krysin L. P. Speech communication and the social roles of speakers. Sociallinguistic research, eds. Krysin L. P., Shmelev D. N. Moscow: Nauka, 1976, 42–52. (In Russ.)

18. Malashenkova E. N. Parting wishes as one of the varieties of the wishes genre: the pragmatic aspect. Studia Slavica XIX, eds. Iablokova E., Adamson I. Tallinn, 2021, 278–289. (In Russ.)

19. Norman B. Yu., Nosrati A. The speech act of wish under the psycholinguistic point of view. Psikholingvisticheskie aspekty izucheniia rechevoi deiatelnosti, 2015, (13): 235−248. (In Russ.)

20. Propp V. Ia. Russian agricultural holidays. St. Petersburg: Terra; Azbuka, 1995, 176. (In Russ.)

21. Prokhorov Yu. E., Sternin I. A. Russians: communicative behavior. 4th ed. Moscow: Flinta; Nauka, 2011, 328. (In Russ.)

22. Rannikh N. A. Speech act of wish and ways of its expression in Russian language . Cand. Philol. Sci. Diss. Moscow, 1994, 159. (In Russ.)

23. Sedov K. F. A person in the genre space of daily communication. Anthology of speech genres: everyday communication , ed. K. F. Sedov Moscow: Labirint, 2007, 7–38. (In Russ.)

24. Sidorova E. N. The image of the addressee in the speech genre of congratulation. Science and society: problems of modern humanitarian research : Proc. V All-Russian full-time and part-time Sci.-Prac. Conf., Saratov, 16 Nov 2019. Saratov: Nauka, 2020, 154−159. (In Russ.)

25. Sidorova E. N. Congratulation as a genre of friendly Internet communication. Philological research, ed. Altynbaeva G. M. Saratov: SGU, 2019, iss. 22, pt. I–III, 170–175. (In Russ.)

26. Somkina N. A. Chinese tradition of good wishes: animal and botanical symbolism. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Asian and African Studies, 2009, (2): 77–86. (In Russ.)

27. Suleimanova S. A. Structural peculiarities of good wishes and harm wishes in the Russian and Azerbaijani languages. Sborniki konferentsii NITS Sotsiosfera, 2011, (13): 156−160. (In Russ.)

28. Sukhoterina T. P. The composition of the congratulation hypergenre in natural written speech: general characteristics of texts with the semantics of congratulations. Vestnik Altaiskoi gosudarstvennoi pedagogicheskoi akademii, 2010, (4): 47–52. (In Russ.)

29. Tarasenko T. V. Etiquette speech genres: an attempt at describing the genre of congratulation. Speech Genres, 2002, (3): 282–289. (In Russ.)

30. Tikhonova A. V. The speech act "benevolence" and its role in the culture of different peoples. Student. Aspirant. Issledovatel, 2017, (1): 36–45. (In Russ.)

31. Trofimova N. A. The ontology of ill wishes. Scientific notes. Vol. 17: Contemporary Philology Issues, intercultural communication and translation, ed. Klimov S. M. St. Petersburg: IVESEP-IIEREL, 2012, 60–66. (In Russ.)

32. Trofimova N. A. Expressive speech acts in dialogical discourse. Semantical, pragmatical, grammatical analysis. St. Petersburg: VVM, 2008, 376. (In Russ.)

33. Formanovskaya N. I. Good wishes as a concept at the basis of speech etiquette. Rechevoe obshchenie, 2011, (12): 69–76. (In Russ.)

34. Khisamova G. G., Latypova L. M. The etiquette speech genres in aspect of intercultural communication (based on Russian and Bashkir languages). Vestnik Bashkirskogo universiteta, 2016, 21 (2): 360–364.

35. Qin P. Lexical-semantic and stylistic dominants of wishes in the speech genre of "congratulation" in the Russian and Chinese languages. Philology. Theory & Practice , 2018, (6-1): 177–182. (In Russ.)

36. Chesnokov I. I. the discursive tactics of evil with: direct forms of presentation in the face-to-face conflict communicative situation. Izv. Volgogr. gos. ped. un-ta , 2012, (4): 79–82. (In Russ.)

37. Zhao Zh. Speech genre "wish" in Russian and Chinese Internet communication. Mir nauki, kul'tury, obrazovaniya, 2021, (4): 406–408. (In Russ.)

38. Chicherov V. I. Russian folk art. Moscow: MSU, 1959, 522. (In Russ.)

39. Shmeleva T. V. Speech genre model. Speech Genres, 1997, (1): 88–98. (In Russ.)

40. Hindelang G. Auffordern: die untertypen des aufforderns und ihre sprachlichen realisierungsformen. Göppingen: Kuemmerle, 1978, 572.

41. Kohrt M. Von Hallo! Wie geht's? bis zu Tschüs! Mach's gut! Grüße, Grußformen und Verwandtes im gegenwärtigen deutschen Sprachgebrauch. Sprachtheorie, Pragmatik, Interdisziplinäres: Akten des 19. Linguistischen Kolloquiums: Vechta 1984, Bd. 2, Hg. Kürschner W., Vogt R., Siebert-Nemann S. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag, 1985, 173–184. doi: 10.1515/9783111612300.173

42. Marten-Cleef S. G efühle ausdrücken: die expressiven sprecakte . Göppingen: Kümmerle Verlag, 1991, 371.


Review

For citations:


Malashenkova E.N. Speech Genre of Congratulation in Asymmetric Communication. SibScript. 2023;25(1):55-65. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21603/sibscript-2023-25-1-55-65

Views: 300


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2949-2122 (Print)
ISSN 2949-2092 (Online)