Preview

SibScript

Advanced search

Macro-Concepts of Rod and Makosh: A Comparative Analysis of Motivating Signs

https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2022-24-6-686-695

Abstract

The article describes the macro-concepts Rod (a Slavic female deity) and Makosh (a Slavic female deity) in the Russian linguistic culture. It is the first attempt to analyze these macro-concepts in terms of conceptual signs. The authors studied the lexemes of Rod and Makosh / Mokosh as the main representatives of the macro-concepts in the National Corpus of the Russian Language, as well as compared their cognitive signs. The methods included descriptive, interpretive, and conceptual linguistic analyses. The macro-concept of Makosh revealed 33 cognitive signs, which were divided into 11 groups: 1. (Divine) motherhood (four signs): goddess, Mother of God / Virgin Mary, poppy head, crown. 2. Natural objects and phenomena (four signs): rain, star, earth, horns / cornucopia. 3. Fertility (two signs): abundance, harvest. 4. Spirits of nature (one sign): mermaids / pitchforks. 5. Kinship (six signs): wife, mother, grandparent, relationship, family, elder sister. 6. Functions (four signs): thunderbearer, spinner, creator, mistress. 7. Relationships (one sign): care. 8. Evaluation (one sign): good. 9. Person (two signs): girl, woman. 10. Fate (four signs): share, lot, fate, luck. 11. Cult (four signs): idol, Paraskeva Pyatnitsa (Saint Paraskevi of Iconium), Rozhanitsa (a Slavic female deity), treba (prayer) / sacrifice. The structure of the macro-concept Rod had 35 cognitive features, which were divided into 13 groups: 1. (Divine) fatherhood (two features): god, God-father. 2. Natural objects and phenomena (three features): star, lightning, sky. 3. Fertility (one sign): harvest. 4. Kinship (four signs): father, grandparent, kinship, family. 5. Functions (five signs): agriculture, ruler, justice, creation, creator. 6. Relationships (two signs): care, protection. 7. Evaluation (three signs): good, deceit, adultery. 8. Fate (two signs): share, fate. 9. Cult (five signs): idol, feast, Stribog (a Slavic male deity), treba (prayer) / sacrifice, Yarilo (a Slavic male deity). 10. Success (four signs): crown, profit, prosperity, success. 11. Place of birth (one feature): Motherland. 12. Property (one sign): strength. 13. People (two signs): civilization, humanity. These signs reflected the peculiarities of the Russian linguistic mentality, which preserved the memory of the cult of Rod (literally, kin) and Makosh (Mother Goddess). This cult was consistently reproduced in veneration of the Mother Earth and family deities Rod and Makosh, the divine parents of people. Christian aspects manifested themselves as the image of Virgin Mary and God the Father. The macro-concepts of Rod and Makosh appeared to have a number of overlapping cognitive features: good, deity (god, goddess), destiny, care, star, idol, progenitor, kinship, family, fate, creator, prayer / sacrifice, harvest. 

About the Authors

Yu. V. Vayrakh
Irkutsk National Research Technical University
Russian Federation

Yuliya V. Vayrakh

Irkutsk 



G. O. Ibraimova
I. Arabaev Kyrgyz State University
Kyrgyzstan

Gulsaira O. Ibraimova

Bishkek 



References

1. Stavitskiy A. V. Myth in the historical field of culture: a psychological aspect. Myth in history, politics, culture: Proc. II Intern. Sci. Interdisciplinary Conf., Sevastopol, 27–28 Jun 2018. Sevastopol: Branch of MSU in Sevastopol, 2018, 238–240. (In Russ.) EDN: OLKBRV

2. Sapir E. Selected works on linguistics and cultural studies. Moscow: Progress, 1993, 656. (In Russ.)

3. Pimenova M. V., Kapenova Zh. Zh. Conceptual research in modern linguistics: theory and practice (the case of landscape concepts). St. Petersburg: SPbSUE, 2016, 152. (In Russ.)

4. Stavitskiy A. V. Myth as a language: on some approaches to the study of myth by linguists. Myth in history, politics, culture: Proc. V Intern. Sci. Interdisciplinary Conf., Sevastopol, 22–25 Jun 2021. Sevastopol: Branch of MSU in Sevastopol, 2021, 253–257. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.35103/SMSU.2021.11.31.035

5. Ibraimova G. O. Structural features of the symbolic macroconcept of mother: from the first sign to the symbol. Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2021, 23(3): 782–789. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2021-23-3-782-789

6. Pimenova M. V. Features of the structure of the symbolic macro concept GENUS. Bulletin of Sh. Ualikhanov Kokshetau University. Philological series, 2021, (2): 37–44. (In Russ.) EDN: VSGPPQ

7. Pimenova M. V. Symbolic macroconcept of Род (genus) in Russian linguoculture. Society, language, and culture in the XXI century: Proc. XXXVIII Intern. Sci. Online Conf. St. Petersburg-Bishkek, 29–30 Apr 2021. St. Petersburg: Institute of Foreign Languages; Bishkek: Manas, 2021, 37–46. (In Russ.) EDN: SPQNZT

8. Pimenova M. V. Myths of Russia: feathered images of gods and goddesses (Perun-Rod and Perynya-Makosh). Mythologos, 2022, (3): 24–32. (In Russ.)

9. Ivanov V. V., Toporov V. N. Slavic mythology. Myths of the peoples of the world, ed. Tokarev S. A. Moscow: Sov. entsiklopediia, 1980, 929–934. (In Russ.)

10. Ivanov V. V., Toporov V. N. Research in the field of Slavic antiquities: Lexical and phraseological issues of text reconstruction. Moscow: Nauka, 1974, 342. (In Russ.) EDN: UFTQFJ

11. Dediushina E. V. Archetype woman in Slavic and German-Scandinavian mythology: general and special. Ethnic culture in the modern world: Proc. VI Intern. Sci.-Prac. Conf., Cheboksary, 8 Nov 2019. Cheboksary: ChSICA, 2020, 37–40. (In Russ.) EDN: HRTAFX

12. Kaplya O. V. Unity women's images of pagan and Christian cultures. Culture, art, and education at the crossroads of times and civilizations: Proc. All-Russian Sci.-Prac. Conf., Volgograd, 29–30 Jan 2019. Volgograd: Volgograd Conservatory (institute) named after P. A. Serebryakova; IP Nikulina M. G., 2019, 41–49 (In Russ.) EDN: XYCUJA

13. Moshina E. A., Umurzakova A. Zh. Myth about the name-days of the earth in Russian linguoculture. Myth in history, politics, culture: Proc. IV Intern. Sci. Interdisciplinary Conf., Sevastopol, 26–27 Jun 2020. Sevastopol: Branch of MSU in Sevastopol, 2020, 141–145. (In Russ.) EDN: EFQQJW

14. Kosmacheva O. Yu. The representation of the semantic element of ‘kind’ in Russian linguistic culture. Humanitaria Studia, 2019, (2): 31–37. (In Russ.) EDN: VTVDLI

15. Surovegina E. S., Korobova Yu. S. Features of the reflection of the mythologeme Mokosh in domestic historiography. Religion and Society 14: Proc. XIV Intern. Sci.-Prac. Conf., Mogilev, 6–11 Apr 2020. Mogilev: MSU named after Kuleshov, 2020, 214–216. (In Russ.) EDN: OOODME

16. Galkovskiy N. M. The struggle of Christianity with the remnants of paganism in Ancient Russia. Kharkov: Eparkhialnaia tip., 1916, vol. 1, 376. (In Russ.)

17. Рыбаков Б. А. Язычество древних славян. М.: Наука, 1981. 608 с. [Rybakov B. A. Paganism of the ancient Slavs. Moscow: Nauka, 1981, 608. (In Russ.) EDN: RBNDBT

18. Belyakova G. S. Slavic mythology. Moscow: Prosveshchenie, 1995, 239. (In Russ.)

19. Ivanov V. V., Toporov V. N. Genus. Myths of the peoples of the world, ed. Tokarev S. A. Moscow: Sov. entsiklopediia, 1980, 871. (In Russ.)

20. Ivanov V. V., Toporov V. N. Mokosh. Myths of the peoples of the world, ed. Tokarev S. A. Moscow: Sov. entsiklopediia, 1980, 683–684. (In Russ.)

21. Trubachev O. N. The history of Slavic terms of kinship and some ancient terms of the social system. Moscow: AS USSR, 1959, 212. (In Russ.) EDN: UFLLDT

22. Rybakov B. A. Paganism of ancient Russia. Moscow: Nauka, 1987, 782. (In Russ.) EDN: RBNDFP

23. Veselovsky A. N. Research in the field of spiritual verse. Iss. XIII. Fate and Destiny in the folk ideas of the Slavs. St. Petersburg: Tip. Imp. Akad. nauk, 1890, vol. 46, 460. (In Russ.)

24. Afanasiev A. N. The meaning of Rod and Rozhanitsa. Archive of historical and legal information relating to Russia. Moscow, 1855, book 2, pt. 1, 132–134. (In Russ.)

25. Pimenova M. V. Soul and spirit: features of conceptualization. Kemerovo: Grafika, 2004, 386. (In Russ.)


Review

For citations:


Vayrakh Yu.V., Ibraimova G.O. Macro-Concepts of Rod and Makosh: A Comparative Analysis of Motivating Signs. The Bulletin of Kemerovo State University. 2022;24(6):686-695. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2022-24-6-686-695

Views: 297


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2949-2122 (Print)
ISSN 2949-2092 (Online)