Victimization in Young Migrants from Central Asia and Transcaucasia
https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2022-24-4-525-532
Abstract
The present research featured the psychological characteristics of the young people who migrated from Transcaucasia and Central Asia. These two groups proved to share such aspects as nepotism and patriarchy, but the specifics of victim behavior were different. The psychodiagnostics tools included O. O. Andronnikova’s methodology for victim behavior propensity and M. A. Odintsova’s questionnaire of role victimization. The study sample consisted of 122 teenagers from families that came to Russia from Transcaucasia (60 people) and Central Asia (62 people). All the respondents studied in schools of the KhantyMansi Autonomous Okrug (Yugra). Teenagers from Transcaucasia were more prone to aggressive, self-destructive, and selfharming behavior, while those from Central Asia were more prone to uncritical and realized type of victim behavior. Teenagers from Transcaucasia assumed the play role of a victim, while students from Central Asia assumed the social role of the victim. The victim profile of teenage migrants from Transcaucasia was characterized by a direct relationship between the propensity to realize the victim play role and active victim behavior; a direct relationship between the propensity to realize the victim play role and aggressive type of victimization the inverse relationship between social victimization role and passive type of victim behavior. Teenagers from Central Asia demonstrated the statistical significance of the relationship between the social role of the victim and the passive type of victimization. In addition, the study revealed an inverse relationship between the social role of the victim and the propensity for an active type of victim behavior.
About the Authors
A. V. Miklyaeva
Herzen State Pedagogical University of Russia
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
St. Petersburg
I. U. Kaiipbekova
Nizhnevartovsk State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Nizhnevartovsk
References
1. Obuhova L. F. Age-related psychology. Moscow: Iurait, 2019, 460. (In Russ.)
2. Snegireva T. V., Bliznetsova O. I. Considering age aspect when developing goal-setting ability in the context of competence approach. Bulletin of Nizhnevartovsk State University, 2015, (2): 63–81. (In Russ.)
3. Bozhovich L. I. Stages of personality formation in ontogenesis. Problems of personality formation: selected psychological works. Moscow; Voronezh: MPSU; MODEK, 2021, 352. (In Russ.)
4. Elkonin D. B. Selected psychological works. Moscow: Pedagogika, 1989, 560. (In Russ.)
5. Erikson E. G. Childhood and Society. Saint Petersburg: Lenato, AST, Universitetskaia kniga, 1996, 592. (In Russ.)
6. Stefanenko T. G. Ethnopsychology. Moscow: IP RAS; Akad. proekt 1999, 320. (In Russ.)
7. Venger A. L., Desiatnikova Yu. M. Group work with high school students aimed at their adaptation to new social conditions. Voprosy Psychologii, 1995, (1): 25–33. (In Russ.)
8. Di Nicola V. F. Beyond Babel: family therapy as cultural translation. International Journal of Family Psychiatry, 1986, 7(2): 179–191.
9. Mudrik A. V. Social pedagogy. Moscow: Academy, 2013, 240. (In Russ.)
10. Stoliarenko A. M. Extreme psychopedagogy. Moscow: YUNITI-DANA, 2002, 607. (In Russ.)
11. Andronnikova O. O. The phenomenon of social and psychological deprivation of the person as the basis of victimization. Siberian Pedagogical Journal, 2015, (4): 130–135. (In Russ.)
12. Andronnikova O. O. Psychological model of the genesis of individual victimization: childhood, adolescence and youth. The Herzen University Conference on Psychology in Education, 2019, (2): 55–64. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33910/herzenpsyconf-2019-2-6
13. Kaiipbekova I. U., Gagay V. V. Hardiness as the basis for overcoming difficult life situations by adolescents from migrant families. World of Science. Pedagogy and psychology, 2021, 9(2). (In Russ.) URL: https://mir-nauki.com/PDF/33PSMN221.pdf (accessed 11 May 2022).
14. Portes A., Zhou M. The new second generation: segmented assimilation and its variants. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 1993, 530(1): 74–96.
15. Lebedeva N. M., Tatarko A. N., Berry J. Social and psychological basis of multiculturalism: testing of intercultural interaction hypotheses in the Russian context. Psikhologicheskii Zhurnal, 2016, 37(2): 92–104. (In Russ.)
16. Hagendoorn L., Drogendijk R., Tumanov S., Hraba J. Inter-ethnic preferences and ethnic hierarchies in the former Soviet Union. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 1998, 22(4): 483–503. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0147-1767(98)00020-0
17. Dubrov D. I. Ideologies of intergroup relations and generalized prejudice towards migrants by Russian population. Social psychology of personality and acmeology: Proc. Intern. Sci.-Prac. Conf., Saratov, 19–20 Oct 2017, 72–78. (In Russ.)
18. Montreuil A., Bourhis R. Y. Majority acculturation orientations toward "valued" and "devalued" immigrants. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 2001, 32(6): 698–719. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022101032006004
19. Soldatova G. U. Psychology of interethnic tension. Moscow: Smysl, 1998, 386. (In Russ.)
20. Guliyev G. Archetypal Azeri: faces of mentality. Baku: Eni nesil, 2002, 354. (In Russ.)
21. Moreva G. I., Kurdoglyan G. M. Peculiarities of national identity of Armenians living in Russia and Armenia. Social'naya psihologiya i obshchestvo, 2019, 10(3): 67–84. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17759/sps.2019100305
22. Pogosian G. A. Armenian society in transformation. Yerevan: Lusabats, 2003, 460. (In Russ.)
23. Nazarov A., Avezov O. Formation of the Uzbek ethnos. PEM: Psychology. Education. Medicine, 2014, (2): 119–124. (In Russ.)
24. Mishina M. M., Vorobyeva K. A. Psychological characteristics of teenagers prone to deviant behavior. On the example of Russian and Uzbek teenagers. RSUH/RGGU Bulletin. "Psychology. Pedagogics. Education" Series, 2020, (4): 117–139. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6398-2020-4-117-139
25. Urunova H. U. The peculiarities of Tajik mentality as an object of social-philosophical analysis. Bulletin of Tajik state university of Law, Business and Policy. Series of Humanitarian Sciences, 2015, (3): 42–47. (In Russ.)
26. Andronnikova O. O. Methodology for the study of propensity to victim behavior. FLS. Fundamentals of Life Safety, 2014, (7): 34–40. (In Russ.)
27. Odintsova M. A. Types of victim behavior: diagnostics of victimization role. Samara: Bakhrakh-M, 2013, 160. (In Russ.)
28. Blaginin A. A., Torchilo V. V. Mathematical methods in psychology and pedagogy. St. Petersburg: LSU named after A. S. Pushkin, 2006, 84. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Miklyaeva A.V., Kaiipbekova I.U. Victimization in Young Migrants from Central Asia and Transcaucasia. The Bulletin of Kemerovo State University. 2022;24(4):525-532. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2022-24-4-525-532
Views:
360
Email this article 