Cognitive-Discursive Modeling of Language Nomination
https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2022-24-2-186-193
Abstract
Systemic and structural linguistics has no answer to the question of how one can make new words, as formulated by Prof. L. V. Shcherba. Its methodology strives to distance itself from the human factor and human activity. The present article introduces an analysis of two derivatological concepts. The first one was developed by G. S. Zenkov, a prominent representative of the structural direction in Kyrgyz linguistics. The second belonged to L. A. Araeva, the founder of the Kemerovo derivatological school with its anthropocentric orientation. The processes of knowledge processing are consolidated by means of morphemic, semantic, and syntactic derivation. The national and cultural component of lexical meaning of motivated words, created by morphemic and semantic derivation, develops in a particular cognitive and discursive situation. This situation becomes clear if approached from the standpoint of another language. A language appears, develops, and functions not by the standards of an abstract person, but by those of a particular language user as part of a particular national, cultural, natural, and economic environment that gave rise to a particular ethnos. Consequently, the processes of creating new words cannot be studied abstractly and formally, but only as a response to the requests and challenges of a particular ethnic community.
References
1. Zenkov G. S. Theory of word formation. Frunze, 1969, 165. (In Russ.)
2. Zenkov G. S. Principles of organization of word-building elements into a system and the possibilities of its description. Bishkek: KRSU, 2004, 346. (In Russ.)
3. Karasik V. I. Biosocial essence of the language in the linguaculturological aspect. Cognitive linguistics and conceptual studies, ed. Pimenova M. V. Kemerovo: KemSU, 2012, iss. 17, 25–37. (In Russ.)
4. Humboldt W. von. Selected works on linguistics. Moscow: Progress, 1984, 397. (In Russ.)
5. Araeva L. A. Argumentation of linguistic facts in the aspect of the antropocentric paradigm. Linguistics as a form of life, eds. Katyshev P. A., Artemova T. V. Moscow: Lenand, 2015, iss. 3, 21–46. (In Russ.)
6. Araeva L. A. Word-formation type. Moscow: Librokom, 2009, 272. (In Russ.)
7. Kravchenko A. V. Language and perception: cognitive aspects of linguistic categorization. Irkutsk: ISU, 1996, 160. (In Russ.)
8. Stepanov Iu. S. Emile Benveniste and linguistics on the path of transformation. General linguistics, ed. Stepanov Iu. S. Moscow: Progress, 1974, 5–16. (In Russ.)
9. Maslova V. A., Pimenova M. V. Linguistic culture codes. Moscow: Flinta; Nauka, 2016, 180. (In Russ.)
10. Sabitova Z. K. New linguistic directions of the XX–XXI centuries. Język i metoda, 2012, (1): 347–360. (In Russ.)
11. Shcherbakova N. N. Semantic word formation as linguistic problem. Omskiy nauchnyy vestnik, 2006, (1): 215–220. (In Russ.)
12. Tagaev M. Dzh. Morphemic-derivative dictionary as a type of cognitive-discursive description of the functioning of a nonnative language. Uchenye zapiski Tavricheskogo natsionalnogo universiteta im. V. I. Vernadskogo. Seriia: Filologiia, 2004, 17(1): 44–51. (In Russ.)
13. Tagaev M. Dzh. Polyparadigm description of morphemics and word formation in the Russian and Kyrgyz languages. Bishkek: KRSU, 2004, 282. (In Russ.)
14. Butakova L. O. The nature of semantic derivation: the cognitive aspect. Semantic derivation and its interaction with morphemic, ed. Osipov B. I. Omsk: OmSU, 2003, 172. (In Russ.)
15. Tagaev M. Dzh. Morphemic word-building as a discursive-semantic field of meaning generation. Vesnіk VDU, 2004, (4): 64–69. (In Russ.)
16. Linguistic worldview of the Teleuts, eds. Araeva L. A., Proskurina A. V. 2nd ed. Kemerovo: KemSU, 2018, 280. (In Russ.)
17. Vygotsky L. S. Collected works. Vol. 1. Theory and history of psychology. Moscow: Pedagogika, 1982, 488. (In Russ.)
18. Golev N. D. Word formation as an evolutionary process. Russkii yazyk v shkole, 2010, (12): 39–44. (In Russ.)
19. Krushevskii N. V. Essay on the science of language. The history of Russian linguistics, comp. Berezin F. M., ed. Filin F. P. 2nd ed. Moscow: Vyssh. shk., 1977, 382–398. (In Russ.)
20. Plakhotnaya Yu. I. Association as a cognitive activity mechanism in shaping a conceptual worldview. Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2021, 23(2): 541–550. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2021-23-2-541-550
21. Niebrzegowska-Bartmińska S. Stereotypes and values in the linguistic worldview. Text in language, speech, and culture. Minsk: RIVSh, 2017, 215–233. (In Russ.)
22. Kubryakova E. S. Reflections on analogy. Essence, development, and functions of the language, ed. Stepanov G. V. Moscow: Nauka, 1987, 43–51. (In Russ.)
23. Kambaralieva U. Dzh., Sternin I. A. Russian and Kyrgyz communicative behavior. Voronezh: Ritm, 2021, 216. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Tagaev M.D. Cognitive-Discursive Modeling of Language Nomination. The Bulletin of Kemerovo State University. 2022;24(2):186-193. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2022-24-2-186-193
Views:
261
Email this article 