Word-Building Type as a Functional Unit of the Lexical System of the Russian Language in the Aspect of Quantitative Derivatology
https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2022-24-2-153-164
Abstract
The author chose to look for explanatory functional models of word formation not outside, but inside the language system, i.e., in its lexical and syntactic subsystems. The research used Runet search engines to identify the quantitative patterns of the Russian word-formation system, namely the word-formation type as its central unit. The quantitative characteristics of the word reflect its speech use and thus can serve as research method. The word-formation type appeared to combine derived lexical units with different quantitative potentials, i.e., unequal frequency. This phenomenon is a factor of the functional stratification of the word-formation type. The study revealed the patterns of this stratification. The quantitative study of Russian substantive derivatives and their use in speech proved the effectiveness of the applied approach in identifying the functional and semantic variability within the corresponding word-formation types. Internet statistics made it possible to give a quantitative description of the lexical implementation of word-formation types, as well as word nests and paradigms, and to project their potential into their internal characteristics.
Keywords
References
1. Araeva L. A. Paradigmatic relations at the word-formation level. Kemerovo: Kuzbassvuzizdat, 1990, 77. (In Russ.)
2. Ulukhanov I. S. Units of the word-formation system of the Russian language and their lexical implementation. Moscow, 1996, 221. (In Russ.)
3. Antipov A. G. Allomorphic variation of the suffix in the word-formation type in Russian dialects. Tomsk: TSU, 2001, 185. (In Russ.)
4. Petrov O. V. Family of words explanatory and word-formation dictionary of composites. Simferopol: V. I. Vemadsky TNU, 2003, 286. (In Russ.)
5. Zenkov G. S. Organization of word-forming elements in the system: principles and description. Bishkek: KNU, 2004, 346. (In Russ.)
6. Denisova E. S. Features of speech and mental functioning of the occasional word in newspaper discourse. Tomsk: TSPU, 2008, 232. (In Russ.)
7. Sokolov O. M. Issues of structural and semantic divergence in vocabulary. Nizhyn: Gidromaks, 2009, 330. (In Russ.)
8. Zhanalina L. K. Integrative word formation. Almaty: Abai University, 2011, 491. (In Russ.)
9. Azarkh Iu. S. Word formation vs. form formation in the history of the Russian language: the noun. Dr. Philol. Sci. Diss. Moscow, 1983, 451. (In Russ.)
10. Nikolaeva N. G. Russian historical word formation in a functional aspect. Dialect word formation, morphemics, and morphology, ed. Shabrova E. N. St. Petersburg-Vologda: Nauka; VSPU, 2007, 29–50. (In Russ.)
11. Ulukhanov I. S. Historical word formation. Historical lexicology. Moscow: LEKRUS, 2012, 365. (In Russ.)
12. Abdullina A. A. Word-formation models of youth slang in Russian-language social networks. Modern linguistic paradigms: traditions and innovations, ed. Kasymova O. P. Ufa: BSU, 2020, 3–9. (In Russ.)
13. Elistratov A. A. Thematic group of slang names in English and Russian sports pharmacology: origin, word formation, and semantics. Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2009, (7): 46–51. (In Russ.)
14. Efimova O. A. The background and the word-building in mobile-phone users' jargon. Herald of Vyatka State Humanitarian University, 2009, (4-2): 47–50. (In Russ.)
15. Araeva L. A. Word-formation types of nouns in the dialect system. Cand. Philol. Sci. Diss. Abstr. Tomsk, 1981, 19. (In Russ.)
16. Araeva L. A. Word-formation type as a semantic microsystem: suffixal substantives in Russian dialects. Dr. Philol. Sci. Diss. Moscow, 1994, 331.
17. Araeva L. A. Cognitive approach to word-formation type as a means of categorizing the linguistic worldview. Language categorization (parts of speech, word formation, theory of nomination): Proc. of the round table dedicated to E. S. Kubryakova, Moscow, 1–31 Oct 1997. Moscow: IL RAS, 1997, 3–6. (In Russ.)
18. Araeva L. A. Word-formation type in the new scientific paradigm. Problems of lexicography, motivology, and derivatology, ed. Blinova O. I. Tomsk: TSU, 1998, 205–211. (In Russ.)
19. Araeva L. A. Antinomy of mono- and polymotivation as an energetic essence of word-formation type. The Russian language. Theory. History. Rhetoric: Proc. Conf., Lesosibirsk, 19–20 Nov 2003. Krasnoyarsk: KrasSU, 2003, iss. 3, 11–15. (In Russ.)
20. Araeva L. A. Word-formation type: traditional and modern vision. Moscow University Bulletin. Series 9. Philology, 2004, (4): 110–115. (In Russ.)
21. Araeva L. A. The word-formation niche as an explicator of the mechanism of perception and systematization of the world by everyday consciousness: dialect derivatives of the suffix -ище. Relevant issues of modern word formation: Proc. Intern. Sci. Conf., Kemerovo, 3–5 Jul 2008, Kemerovo: Kuzbassvuzizdat, 2008, iss. 2, 151–156. (In Russ.)
22. Kubryakova E. S. Language and science in the late XX century: experience of paradigmatic analysis. Language and science in the late XX century, ad. Stepanov Iu. S. Moscow: RSUH, 1995, 144–238. (In Russ.)
23. Kolmogorova A. V., Chistova E. V., Martynyuk K. V., Ukanakova N. V., Radevich V. V., Varlamova O. N., Mzhelskikh M. K. "Rhizomorphic tangle": cognition vs communication. Krasnoyarsk: SFU, 2017, 251. (In Russ)
24. Araeva L. A. Word-formation type as a mental-linguistic category. Natural and Intellectual Resources of Siberia (SIBRESURS-8-2002): Proc. 8th Intern. Sci.-Prac. Conf., Kemerovo, 26–27 Sep, 2002. Tomsk: TSU, 2002, pt. 2, 91–95. (In Russ.)
25. Uglanova I. A. Is there a mainstream in modern linguistics? Philological Studies, 2006, 4(1). Available at: https://journals.ukim.mk/index.php/philologicalstudies/article/view/812 (accessed 10 Jan 2022). (In Russ.)
26. Golev N. D. Dynamic aspect of lexical motivation. Tomsk: TSU, 1989, 252. (In Russ.)
27. Golev N. D. Word formation as an evolutionary process. Russian Language at School, 2010, (12): 39–44. (In Russ.)
28. Golev N. D., Lebedeva N. B., Khalina N. V., Murzin L. N., Karpukhina V. A., Chernyshova T. V., Chuvakin A. A., Brinev K. I., Trubnikova Yu. V. Essays on linguistic determinology and derivatology of the Russian language. Barnaul: ASU, 1998, 252. (In Russ.)
29. Golev N. D. Quantitative aspect of motivational-word-formation relations: denominative formation of the Russian language. Word combination, word composition, and affixation as ways of word formation, ed. Bartkov B. I. Vladivostok: Far Eastern Branch of the USSR Academy of Sciences, 1990, 132–140. (In Russ.)
30. Golev N. D. Some problems of lexical and word-formation motivation on the frequency axis: construction of the theory of quantitative motivology. Man – communications – text. Iss. 1. Man and communicative self-realization, ed. Chuvakin A. A. Barnaul: ASU, 1997, 90–97. (In Russ.)
31. Golev N. D. Lexical functioning of word-building and the lexical-word-building system of the Russian language in the light of Internet statistics. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filologiya, 2011, (1): 22–31. (In Russ.)
32. Ulukhanov I. S. Customary and occasional units of the word-formation system. Voprosy Jazykoznanija, 1984, (1): 44–50. (In Russ.)
33. Ulukhanov I. S. Neology and borrowings. New phenomena in Slavic word formation: system and functioning: Proc. Intern. Sci. Symposium "Contemporary Slavic Languages and Cultures", Proc. XI Intern. Sci. Conf. the Commission on Slavic Word Formation at the Intern. Committee of Slavists, Moscow, 24–26 Mar 2009. Moscow: Maks Press, 2010, 25–36. (In Russ.)
34. Shkuropatskaya M. G. Word-formation paradigm and its lexical realization. Chelovek i iazyk v kommunikativnom prostranstve, 2014, 5(5): 63–69. (In Russ.)
35. Golev N. D. Internet search engines as a linguistic source: theoretical and applied issues of Russian word formation. New phenomena in Slavic word formation: system and functioning: Proc. Intern. Sci. Symposium " Contemporary Slavic Languages and Cultures", Proc. XI Intern. Sci. Conf. the Commission on Slavic Word Formation at the Intern. Committee of Slavists, Moscow, 24–26 Mar 2009. Moscow: Maks Press, 2010, 197–212. (In Russ.)
36. Lebedeva N. B. Experimental study of a derived word: the ratio of derivability as a word-forming feature and usuality as a lexical feature. New phenomena in Slavic word formation: system and functioning: Proc. Intern. Sci. Symposium "Slavic Languages and Cultures in the modern world", Proc. XI Intern. Sci. Conf. the Commission on Slavic Word Formation at the Intern. Committee of Slavists, Moscow, 24–26 Mar 2009. Moscow: Maks Press, 2010, 390–400. (In Russ.)
37. Ulukhanov I. S. Reasons affecting the degree of consistency and normativity of language units. Izvestiia AN SSSR. Seriia literatury i iazyka, 1991, 50, (4): 291–304. (In Russ.)
38. Saussure F. de. Works in Linguistics. Moscow: Progress, 1977, 695. (In Russ.)
39. Golev N. D. Some problems of studying Russian adjectonyms in the regional aspect. Russian dialects and toponymy of Altai in their history and current state, ed. Vorobyov I. A. Barnaul: ASU, 1993, 15–26. (In Russ.)
40. Golev N. D. Non-semantic elementss' status and rank in the morphoderivational word structure paper 2: systemic and structural, functional and genetic factors. Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2012, (4-1): 205–211. (In Russ.)
41. Boldina O. P. Experimental and theoretical study of the semantic distance of derivationally related words in the Russian language. Cand. Philol. Sci. Diss. Biysk, 2006, 214. (In Russ.)
42. Boldina O. P. Associative potential of a derivational word. Associative dimension of system relations in vocabulary, ed. Shkuropatskaya M. G. Biysk: ASAE, 2012, 34–45. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Golev N.D. Word-Building Type as a Functional Unit of the Lexical System of the Russian Language in the Aspect of Quantitative Derivatology. The Bulletin of Kemerovo State University. 2022;24(2):153-164. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2022-24-2-153-164