Denotation Variation Degree of Linguistic Sign: an Experimental Study of Interpretative Activity
https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2021-23-4-1067-1073
Abstract
This article features the concept of denotation variation degree of the linguistic sign, which remains largely understudied. The research introduced the term "denotation variation degree" and revealed its practical and theoretic significance, both for general linguistics and for particular aspects related to the world denotation variation degree as part of individual interpretation. The objective was to describe the denotation variation degree as high or low based on specific vocabulary. The linguistic experiment included two steps; speakers were given a model situation and asked to interpret a definition. Test results demonstrated a low variation degree at the level of the word and denotation correlation because the denotate component had a low potential for notional plurality. High variation degree appeared in connotative and associational word components with a higher potential for the different notional variants.
References
1. Frege G. Sense and denotation. Semiotics and informatics, ed. Mikhailov A. M. Moscow: VINITI, 1977, iss. 8, 181–210. (In Russ.)
2. Frege G. Sense and significance. Logics and logical semantics, ed. Kuzicheva Z. A. Moscow: Aspect Press, 2000, 230–247. (In Russ.)
3. Weinrich H. Linguistics of lying. Language and modeling of social interaction, ed. Petrov V. V. Moscow: Progress, 1987, 44–87. (In Russ.)
4. Kravets A. S. The value topological structure. Methodological problems of cognitive linguistics, ed. Sternin I. A. Voronezh: VGU, 2001, 17–25. (In Russ.)
5. Ufimtseva A. A. The word lexical meaning. Foundations of the semiologic lexical description. Moscow: Nauka, 1986, 239. (In Russ.)
6. Alefirenko N. F. The semantics outstanding issues. Moscow: Gnozis, 2005, 326. (In Russ.)
7. Golev N. D. Experimental research on the Russian vocabulary and texts within one linguistic school: experience of summary and methodological reflection in hindsight. Paper 2. Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2017, (3): 172–179. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2017-3-172-179
8. Kim L. G. Incomplete and redundant information as factor of multiple interpretations of advertising text. Language. Right. Society: Proc. Intern. Sci.-Prac. Conf., Penza, 10–13 Nov 2020. Penza: PGU, 2020, 145–148. (In Russ.)
9. Kim L. G, Belyaeva E. A. Recipient's pre-text expectations as a factor of various interpretations of political discourse. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filologiya, 2019, (57): 48–62. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17223/19986645/57/3
10. Satuchina T. Y. Dependence of strategies of a word interpretation on its lexical and semantic characteristics. Russian language in modern scientific and educational space: Proc. Intern. Sci. Conf., Moscow, 28–29 Oct 2020. Moscow: RUDN, 2020, 130–132. (In Russ.)
11. Arbatskii D. I. The main methods word meaning explanation. Russian Language at School, 1970, (3): 26–31. (In Russ.)
12. Volobueva Y. S., Golev N. D. Definition and association as different forms of the Russian denotative words lexical meaning representation. Ordinary metalanguage consciousness: ontological and epistemological aspects, ed. Golev N. D. Kemerovo: KemGU, 2010, pt. 3, 282–289. (In Russ.)
13. Golev N. D. Personological difference of the language. Izvestiia Altaiskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2004, (4): 41–45. (In Russ.)
14. Kim L. G., Kuznetsova T. Y. Definitional strategy of the objective meaning words semantization. Ordinary metalanguage consciousness: ontological and epistemological aspects, ed. Golev N. D. Kemerovo: KemGU, 2010, pt. 3, 207–216. (In Russ.)
15. Kuznetsova T. Y. Revised the word semantics variability. The ordinary metalinguistic consciousness and simple linguistics, ed. Kim L. G. Kemerovo: KemGU, 2012, 131–137. (In Russ.)
16. Golev N. D., Kim L. G. Variably interpretative text functioning: revising the linguistic variation expansion. Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2009, (27): 12–20. (In Russ.)
17. Bulygina T. V., Krylov S. A. Denotate. Linguistic encyclopedic dictionary, ed. Yartseva V. N. Moscow: Sov. entsikl., 1990, 128–129. (In Russ.)
18. Ordinary metalanguage consciousness: ontological and epistemological aspects, ed. Golev N. D. Kemerovo: KemGU, 2010, pt. 3, 350. (In Russ.)
19. Kim L. G. The text as the object of the metalinguistic activity of the subject expositor. Ordinary metalanguage consciousness: ontological and epistemological aspects, ed. Golev N. D. Kemerovo: KemGU, 2010, pt. 3, 122–142. (In Russ.)
20. Rostova A. N. Metatext as the metalinguistic consciousness explication form in a Siberian Russian dialect. Tomsk: Izd-vo Tom. un-ta, 2000, 194. (In Russ.)
21. Kuznetsova T. Y. The words semantization strategies and conditions determining their choice, 2nd ed. Kemerovo: KemGU, 2015, 92. (In Russ.)
22. Sternin I. A. Lexical meaning in language. Voronezh: Izd-vo Voronezh. un-ta, 1985, 170. (In Russ.)
23. Nesterova N. G. Revising the meaning and sense. Current topics of the Russian Philology, ed. Demeshkina T. A. Tomsk: Izd-vo Tom. un-ta, 2000, 91–96. (In Russ.)
24. Kim L. G. Interpretation process model and factors determinating the variability of the interpretation result. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2009, (318): 29–36. (In Russ.)
25. Kim L. G. 'Text length" as a factor of variety and its interpretative functioning. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filologiya, 2017, (49): 38–51. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17223/19986645/49/3
26. Kuznetsova T. Y. The factors determining the variability of words interpretations. Issues of Education and Science in the XXI century: Proc. Intern. Sci.-Prac. Conf., Tambov, 29 Apr 2013. Tambov: Konsaltingovaia kompaniia Iukom, 2013, pt. 3, 85–86. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Satuchina T.Yu. Denotation Variation Degree of Linguistic Sign: an Experimental Study of Interpretative Activity. The Bulletin of Kemerovo State University. 2021;23(4):1067-1073. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2021-23-4-1067-1073
Views:
336
Email this article 