Codes of Modern Written Communication: Acoustic-Auditory vs. Manual-Visual
https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2021-23-4-1024-1031
Abstract
The article introduces the semiotic, cognitive, and technical aspects of the most important trends in the modern written communication, which arise as a result of the competition between acoustic-auditory and manual-visual codes. The author believes that Russian education has to adapt to the contemporary trends in virtual communication, which requires a preliminary research. The problem is that the integral-systemic presentation of communicative content is developing as a result of the growing share of visual data in various types of communication. The school course of Russian is based on elementary strategies and cannot keep up with these changes. Video-clip unites give the visual-written perception much better holistic possibilities than those of the phono-auditory-written channel. The competition of these two forms of writing is unlikely to displace the weaker opposition member. Chances are that it will redistribute their functions based on the advantages of each form.
Keywords
codes of writing,
holistic tendencies in writing,
elementary tendencies in writing,
virtual communication,
calligraphy
Supporting agencies: The research was supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research, project No. 20-412-420004 r_a "Linguistic monitoring of social tension in Kuzbass".
References
1. Altukhova T. V., Lebedeva N. B. Virtual communication: a new stage in writing communication. Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2012, (1): 105–111. (In Russ.)
2. Golev N. D. Written communication of modern time: main vectors of development. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filologiya, 2012, (2): 5–18. (In Russ.)
3. Golev N. D. Russian colloquial written speech and the reflection of its modern state in the ordinary metalanguage consciousness of virtual communication participants. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filologiya, 2013, (5): 12–30. (In Russ.)
4. Stroganov V. B., Voroshilova M. B. "Rhizomorph" of social networks as a stage of transition to the Web.3 system. Social networks: a complex linguistic analysis, eds. Golev N. D., Kim L. G. Kemerovo: KemGU, 2021, vol. 1, 30–40. (In Russ.)
5. Social networks: a complex linguistic analysis, eds. Golev N. D., Kim L. G. Kemerovo: KemGU, 2021, vol. 2, 300. (In Russ.)
6. Yang Yi. Calligraphy: an art that changes with time. Vestnik NSU. Series: History and Philology, 2006, 5(4): 124–128. (In Russ.)
7. Shkuratov V. A. Historical psychology. Book one. Introduction to Historical Psychology, 3rd ed. Moscow: Kredo, 2015, 244. (In Russ.)
8. Kondrakova S. O. V. Shatalov's reference signals as means of activisation of the creative approach to the teaching process. Izvestiya Rossiyskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta im. A. I. Gertsena, 2008, (65): 404–408. (In Russ.)
9. Isakov V. B. Grafento 1: Graphic language of legal analytics. Moscow: NIU VShE, 2016, 50. (In Russ.)
10. Golev N. D. "Nootheca": point-rating system + design, or Revisiting the issue of transition from quantitative to qualitative measurements of knowledge, skills, and abilities. Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriia: Gumanitarnye i obshchestvennye nauki, 2019, 3(3): 199–213. (In Russ.) https://doi. org/10.21603/2542-1840-2019-3-3-199-213
11. Golev N. D. Cognitive aspect of Russian spelling: spelling-centrism as a principle of ordinary metalanguage consciousness. Reflection of the Russian language picture of the world in vocabulary and grammar, ed. Steksova T. I. Novosibirsk: NGPU, 1999, 97–107. (In Russ.)
12. Golev N. D. An innovative program for the development of writing and speech methods of schoolchildren on the basis of a propaedeutic study of the text (technological aspect). Doklady Sibirskogo otdeleniia Akademii nauk vysshei shkoly, 2001, (1): 86–94. (In Russ.)
13. Golev N. D. Reference points of the text as elements of the cognitive mechanisms of its propaedeutic analysis (the case of teaching stylization). Social and cognitive functioning of language, ed. Golev N. D. Kemerovo: KemGU, 2017, 226–240. (In Russ.)
14. Totskii P. S. Spelling without rules. Moscow: Prosveshchenie, 1991, 142. (In Russ.)
15. Cultural and speech situation in modern Russia, ed. Kupina N. A. Ekaterinburg: UrFU, 2000, 379. (In Russ.)
16. Golev N. D. Linguistic and linguadidactic problems of language education: the experience of building a unified course for the development of language ability. Applied Philology in the field of engineering education. Methodology and methodology of language teaching at a technical university, ed. Novikova E. G. Northampton-Tomsk: TPU, 2004, vol. 1, 15–38. (In Russ.)
17. Tiskova O. V. On potential considering the Russian punctuation from the perlocutionary perspective. Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2015, (4-1): 166–169. (In Russ.)
18. Timoshenko N. V. Modern youth and its communication in the Internet: generations Y and Z. Skif. Voprosy studencheskoi nauki, 2017, (11): 94–98. (In Russ.)
19. Krokhmalny R. O. Communication and modern educational environment of HEE: challenges of information society. Molody ucheny, 2016, (10): 137–140. (In Russ.)
20. Khmelkova M. A. Modern communication and communication in the educational space of the university. Akhmadieva L. R., Barlas T. V., Buslaeva E. L., Kalinina N. V., Kosheleva Yu. P., Malova Y. V., Pashukova T. I., Troitskaya E. A., Khmelkova M. A., Yurkina L. V. Psychological and pedagogical aspects of effective communication in the educational environment. Moscow: MGLU, 2018, 33–42. (In Russ.)
21. Kim L. G. The description units of the text interpretive functioning in the addressee field. Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2012, (1): 186–190. (In Russ.)
22. Golev N. D., Lebedeva N. B., Khalina N. V., Murzin L. N., Karpukhina V. A., Chernyshova T. V., Chuvakin A. A., Brinev K. I., Trubnikova Yu. V. Essays on linguistic determinology and derivatology of the Russian language. Barnaul: AltGU, 1998, 252. (In Russ.)
23. Shpilnaya N. N. Visualization as a grammatical principle (to the problem of describing the principles of Russian writing). Voprosy kognitivnoi lingvistiki, 2020, (4): 106–115. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20916/1812-3228-2020-4-106-115
24. Salimzanova D. A., Bilyalova A. A., Bazarova L. V., Khairullina D. D. Visualization as the basis of quality education in a linguistic university. Global scientific potential, 2020, (3): 103–107. (In Russ.)
25. Motornaya S. E. Information visualization as a higher education technology. Azimuth of Scientific Research: Pedagogy and Psychology, 2020, 9(2): 177–183. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26140/anip-2020-0902-0041
Review
For citations:
Golev N.D. Codes of Modern Written Communication: Acoustic-Auditory vs. Manual-Visual. The Bulletin of Kemerovo State University. 2021;23(4):1024-1031. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2021-23-4-1024-1031
Views:
436
Email this article 