Functional Characteristics of Modal Markers in German, Russian, and Udmurt
https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2021-23-3-805-813
Abstract
The research considered the pragmatic identity of modal markers in German, Russian, and Udmurt. The research objective was to describe the semantic and pragmatic properties of modal utterances in order to establish the functional equivalence of modal markers in these languages. The utterances with modal markers demonstrated a whole complex of lexical means that express modality, probably, because these languages are actively developing, while maintaining the identity and culture of the peoples they represent. The pragmatic features of modal markers were studied in the process of communication on the basis of linguistic and extralinguistic (contextual) factors. The modal markers expressed various feelings and emotional responses; they revealed semantic and pragmatic unity and were responsible for the differences in the communicative and pragmatic characteristics of the utterances.
About the Author
E. S. Oshanova
Kalashnikov Izhevsk State Technical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Izhevsk
References
1. Oshanova E. S. The role of modal particles in the formation of the cognitive base and the communicative-cognitive perspective of the utterance. Cand. Philol. Sci. Diss. Abstr. Moscow, 2017, 22. (In Russ.)
2. Yarygina E. S. Modus and modality – terminological synonyms? Herald of Vyatka State Humanitarian University, 2012, (2-2): 32–38. (In Russ.)
3. Vinogradov V. V. The Russian language (the grammatical doctrine of the word), 4th ed. Moscow: Rus. iaz., 2001, 719. (In Russ.)
4. Guseva L. A. Modal words as part of speech. Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki, 2017, (1-2): 109–113. (In Russ.)
5. Blerina T. A. Lexical means expressing modality opportunities in English, Albanian and Russian languages. RUDN Journal of Language Studies, Semiotics and Semantics, 2011, (4): 63–71. (In Russ.)
6. Oshanova E. S. Means of modal and emotive expression in political communication in English, German, Russian and Udmurt. Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State University, 2020, (1): 115–124. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24411/1994-2796-2020-10115
7. Potebnia A. A. From the notes on Russian grammar. Moscow: Uchpedgiz, 1958, vol. 1–2, 536. (In Russ.)
8. Vinogradov V. V. Modality and modal words in Russian. Studies in the Russian grammar: Selected works. Moscow: Nauka, 1975, 53–87. (In Russ.)
9. Shakhmatov A. A. Syntax of the Russian language, 3rd ed. Moscow: URSS, 2001, 620. (In Russ.)
10. Zhirmunsky V. M. The origin of parts of speech and their classification. The theory of parts of speech in typologically different languages, eds. Zhirmunsky V. M., Sunik O. P. Leningrad: Nauka. Leningr. otd-ie, 1968, 7–32. (In Russ.)
11. Averina A. V. Grammatical features of modal words in the German and Russian languages. Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki, 2020, 13(2) 230–234. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30853/filnauki.2020.2.46
12. Kibardina T. M. Means of expressing modality in the Udmurt language. Izhevsk: Udmurt. un-t, 2012, 194. (In Russ.)
13. Grammar of the modern Udmurt language: Phonetics and morphology, ed. Perevoshchikov P. N. Izhevsk: Udm. kn. izd-vo, 1962, 376. (In Russ.)
14. Averina A. V. Modal particles in the sentence structure (in German and Russian languages). Bulletin of the Moscow Region State University. Series: Linguistics, 2020, (2): 59–67. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18384/2310-712X-2020-2-59-67
15. Thurmair M. Modalpartikeln und ihre Kombinationen. Tübingen: Niemeyer Verlag, 1989, 314.
16. Molnar A. Die Grammatikalisierung deutscher Modalpartikeln. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 2002, 129.
17. Abraham W. Modalpartikel und Mirativeffekte. Grammatische Funktionen aus Sicht der japanischen und deutschen Germanistik (Linguistische Berichte Sonderheft 24). Hamburg: H. Buske, 2017, 76–108.
18. Gärtner H.-M. Root infinitivals and modal particles. An interim report. Discourse particles. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2017, 115–143.
19. Kummer M. Modalpartikeln denn, doch, eben, etwa, eigentlich, ja. Bonn: Inter Nations, 1984, 52.
20. Zifonun G., Hoffmann L. Grammatik der deutschen Sprache. Berlin: De Gruyter, 1997, 2800.
21. Diewald G. "Abtönungspartikel". Deutsche Wortarten, Hg. Hoffmann L. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2007, 117–141.
22. Hentschel E., Weydt H. Handbuch der deutschen Grammatik. Berlin-N. Y.: De Gruyter, 2013, 484.
23. Helbig G., Helbig A. Deutsche Partikeln – richtig gebraucht? Leipzig-Berlin-München-Wien-Zürich-N. Y.: Langenscheidt Verlag Enzyklopädie, 1995, 224.
24. Bußmann H. Lexikon der Sprachwissenschaft. Stuttgart: Kröner, 1990, 561.
25. Linke A., Nussbaumer M., Portmann P. R. Studienbuch Linguistik. Berlin: De Gruyter, 1995, 272.
26. Averina A. V. Functions of modal components in German fiction. Proceedings of Voronezh State University. Series: Linguistics and Intercultural Communication, 2020, (1): 61–69. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17308/lic.2020.1/2731
Review
For citations:
Oshanova E.S. Functional Characteristics of Modal Markers in German, Russian, and Udmurt. The Bulletin of Kemerovo State University. 2021;23(3):805-813. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2021-23-3-805-813
Views:
368
Email this article 