Macroconcept Army: Analyzing the Structure of a Borrowed Macroconcept
https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2021-23-3-750-759
Abstract
The research objective was to describe the structure of the borrowed macroconcept army, i.e. to determine its motivating and concept signs in the Russian mentality. The study involved nine etymological dictionaries and revealed six motivating signs, while nine explanatory dictionaries and language material made it possible to identify 32 conceptual signs: 1. Types and kinds of military units (eleven signs): air; (field) troops; armed (motivating signs to arm); (highest military / large) unit; naval; as opposed to naval and air forces; opposite of the elite military units; one / different branches of the armed forces; missile; ground (infantry / cavalry); without privileges. 2. Armed people (seven signs): Bolshevik (military forces) / Red Army; (military) men; army; aggregate; forces; composition of (several) corps and divisions; part of the active armed forces (at the front). 3. Purpose (six signs): war; to make capable of fighting (motivating signs); for conducting military operations; protection (of the state); ensuring the inviolability of borders and independence of the state; service. 4. Combat equipment (four signs): weapon (motivating signs); device (motivating signs); supply (motivating signs); to equip (motivating signs). 5. Leadership (two signs): state; under the general command of the chief military leader. 6. Association of people on a certain basis (two signs): a large number of people (united by a common feature: profession, social status, the same problem); proletariat / workers / workers.
References
1. Gurevich A. Ya. Mentality issues in modern historiography. General history: discussion and new approaches, eds. Chubarian A. O., Sogrin V. V. Moscow: Nauka, 1989, iss. 1, 75–89. (In Russ.)
2. Kolesov V. V. Mental characteristics of the Russian word in the language and in philosophical intuition. Languages and ethnic mentality, ed. Tarlanov Z. K. Petrozavodsk: PGU, 1995, 13–24. (In Russ.)
3. Kolesov V. V. Ancient Russia: word heritage. The world of man. St. Petersburg: Filol. fak-t SPbGU, 2000, 326. (In Russ.)
4. Kolesov V. V. Philosophy of the Russian word. St. Petersburg: Iuna, 2002, 448. (In Russ.)
5. Kolesov V. V. Language and mentality. St. Petersburg: Peterb. vostokovedenie, 2004, 240. (In Russ.)
6. Kolesov V. V. Russian mentality in language and text. St. Petersburg: Peterb. vostokovedenie, 2006, 621. (In Russ.)
7. Kolesov V. V., Pimenova M. V. The linguistic basis of the Russian mentality, 3rd ed. Moscow: Flinta; Nauka, 2016, 134. (In Russ.)
8. Mentality and language, ed. Pimenova M. V. Kemerovo: KemGU, 2006, 256. (In Russ.)
9. Mentality and the changing world, ed. Pimenova M. V. Sevastopol: Ribest, 2009, 504. (In Russ.)
10. Pimenova M. V. Semantics of linguistic mentality and implication. Philological Sciences, 1999, (4): 80–82. (In Russ.)
11. Pocheptsov G. G. Linguistic mentality: way of representing the world. Voprosy Jazykoznanija, 1990, (6): 110–122. (In Russ.)
12. Logical analysis of language: cultural concepts, ed. Aroutiounova N. D. Moscow: Nauka, 1991, 203. (In Russ.)
13. Pimenova M. V. Deception of imaginary worlds (the world of illusions: a case experience of a borrowed concept). Concept and language picture of the world, eds. E. A. Pimenov, M. V. Pimenova. Kemerovo: KemGU, 2006, iss. 9, 26–37. (In Russ.)
14. Pimenova M. V. Concepts of the inner world (Russian-English correspondence). Dr. Philol. Sci. Diss. St. Petersburg, 2001, 497. (In Russ.)
15. Pimenova M. V., Bakirova A. A. Symbolic macroconcept of the universe in the aspect of the first sign in Russian linguoculture. Humanitarian Vector, 2021, 16(1): 92–101. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21209/1996-7853-2021-16-1-92-101
16. Lehrer A. Semantic fields and lexical structure. Amsterdam-London-N. Y.: North-Holland Publishing Company, 1974, 46.
17. Babushkin A. P. Concepts of different types in vocabulary and phraseology and methods of their identification. Methodological problems of cognitive linguistics, ed. Sternin I. A. Voronezh: VGU, 2001, 52–57. (In Russ.)
18. Allahverdiev E. Z. Concept "army" in the linguistic consciousness of foreign members of the military. Vestnik Omskoi Pravoslavnoi Dukhovnoi Seminarii, 2017, (1): 106–108. (In Russ.)
19. Dovgolyuk M. N. Associative and verbal field "Army" in Russia linguistic consciousness (sociocultural and gender aspects). Nauchnyi dialog, 2015, (12): 49–59. (In Russ.)
20. Nerovnaya N. A., Zatsepin P. K., Vyskrebentsev N. I. Concept " Russian Army" in the Russian language cognition (based on the material of mass media publication). Research Innovations 2019: Proc. Intern. Research Competition, Petrozavodsk, 23 Sep 2019. Petrozavodsk: MTsNP "Novaia Nauka", 2019, 104–107. (In Russ.)
21. Kosyanenko S. A. The concept of "army" in the view of military personnel and civilians. Problems of modernization of modern higher education: linguistic aspects: Proc. III Intern. Sci.-Method. Conf., Omsk, 26 May 2017. Moscow: Izd-vo Ippolitova, 2017, vol. 1, 42–46. (In Russ.)
22. Pimenova M. V., Bodrikov A. B. Formation of cadets linguocultural competence in military institutes on the basis of the voin (warrior) concept. Scholarly Notes of Transbaikal State University, 2018, 13(2): 117–123. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21209/2542-0089-2018-13-2-117-123
23. Krukova N. F., Bodrikov A. B. Voin (warrior) concept in the aspect of lexicographical sources. Vestnik TvGU. Seriia: "Filologiia", 2019, (2): 19–26. (In Russ.)
24. Volkova S. B. The concept "military service" and its components in artistic discourse. Language, consciousness, communication, eds. Krasnykh V. V., Izotov A. I. Moscow: MAKS Press, 2009, iss. 39, 87–94. (In Russ.)
25. Ogneva E. A. Cognitive modeling of literary concept-sphere, 2nd ed. Moscow: Editus, 2013, 280. (In Russ.)
26. Rabkina N. V. WAR concept in English military poetry. Cand. Philol. Sci. Diss. Kemerovo, 2008, 200. (In Russ.)
27. Smolin I. V. Discourse of the Russian army in the media as a field for the "patriotism" concept implementation. Journalism of the digital era: how the profession is changing: Proc. Intern. Sci.-Prac. Conf., Ekaterinburg, 14–15 Apr 2016. Ekaterinburg: UrFU, 2016, 228–231. (In Russ.)
28. Fesenko O. P. The concept of "victory" in Russian linguaculture: an overview. Actual problems of linguistics and methods of teaching foreign languages: Proc. Intern. Sci.-Method. Conf., Omsk, 27 Mar 2015. Omsk: OmIuI, 2016, 58–62. (In Russ.)
29. Kolesov V. V. Ancient Russia: word heritage. Book. 4. The wisdom of the word. St. Petersburg: Filol. fak-t SPbGU; NestorIstoriia, 2011, 480. (In Russ.)
30. Karasik V. I. Ethnospecific concepts. Popova Z. D., Sternin I. A., Karasik V. I., Kretov A. A., Boriskina O. O., Pimenov E. A., Pimenova M. V. Introduction to cognitive linguistics. Kemerovo: KemGU, 2009, 59–103. (In Russ.)
31. Pimenov E. A., Pimenova M. V. Comparative analysis of borrowed concepts (case of the Russian concept Idea and the German concept Idee). Conceptual areas 'THE WORLD' and 'THE PERSON', ed. Pimenova M. V. Kemerovo: Grafika, 2005, iss. 5, 143–177. (In Russ.)
32. Krasavsky N. A. Emotional concepts in German and Russian linguacultures. Volgograd: Peremena, 2001, 493. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Bodrikov A.B. Macroconcept Army: Analyzing the Structure of a Borrowed Macroconcept. The Bulletin of Kemerovo State University. 2021;23(3):750-759. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2021-23-3-750-759
Views:
483
Email this article 