Factors Affecting the Viability of Disabled COVID-19 Patients
https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2021-23-3-717-728
Abstract
The present research featured patients with disabilities who survived COVID-19 and had to undergo a course of comprehensive rehabilitation. Foreign scientists proved that COVID-19 can affect viability, although it does not necessarily triggers mental and psychological health disorders. The research objective was to define the main factors that affect the viability of clients of a medical rehabilitation center. The article contains a review of various approaches to the concept of viability and introduces an authentic definition. The analysis was based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) and revealed both positive and negative factors that affect the viability of disabled patients after COVID-19. The positive factors included harmonious or anosognosic attitude to the disease, i.e. unwillingness to consider oneself "sick" or "disabled" in working-age patients with short disease history and high rehabilitation potential, optimistic life attitude, and good family support. The negative factors included anosognosic attitude to the disease in retired patients with a long disease history. They demonstrated diffuse and mixed types of attitude to the disease, with inconsistent components, poor chances for successful rehabilitation and social adaptation, pessimism, and cynicism about rehabilitation. The research results can help specialists of medical centers to adapt their rehabilitation roadmaps to the needs of disabled COVID-19 survivors.
About the Author
T. V. Rogacheva
Regional Disabled Persons Rehabilitation Center
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Yekaterinburg
References
1. Spencer S., Román G., Buguet A., Guekht A., Reis J. COVID-19: neurological sequelae. Health Risk Analysis. 2021, (2): 168–176. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21668/health.risk/2021.2.16
2. Mei Q., Wang F., Bryant A., Wei L., Yuan X., Li J. Mental health problems among COVID-19 survivors in Wuhan, China. World Psychiatry, 2021, 20(1): 139–140. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20829
3. Ritchie R., Chan D. The emergence of cognitive COVID. World Psychiatry, 2021, 20(1): 52–53. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20837
4. Greenberg N., Rafferty L. Post-traumatic stress disorder in the aftermath of COVID-19 pandemic. World Psychiatry, 2021, 20(1): 53–54. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20838
5. Nestik T. A. Psychological consequences of the pandemic and resources of resilience in the face of global risks. Globalistics-2020: Global issues and the future of humankind: Proc. Intern. Sci. Congress, Moscow, 18–22 May, 20–24 Oct 2020. Moscow: MOOSIPNN N. D. Kondratieva, 2020, 808–813. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.46865/978-5-901640-33-3-2020-808-813
6. Ahrens K. F., Neumann R. J., Kollmann B., Plichta M. M., Lieb K., Tüscher O., Reif F. Differential impact of COVID-19 related lockdown on mental health in Germany. World Psychiatry, 2021, 20(1): 140–141. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20830
7. Guryanova M. P. Education of a viable personality in a disharmonious society. Pedagogika, 2004, (1): 11–18. (In Russ.)
8. Guryanova M. P. Viability of personality as an educational phenomenon. Pedagogika, 2006, (10): 43–50. (In Russ.)
9. Selezneva N. T., Rublenko N. V., Todysheva T. Yu. Viability of personality. Krasnoyarsk: KGPU im. V. P. Astafieva, 2015, 308. (In Russ.)
10. Rylskaya E. A. Psychology of human vitality. Dr. Psychol. Sci. Diss. Abstr. Yaroslavl, 2014, 39. (In Russ.)
11. Rylskaya E.A. Vitality of a human: criteria, factors, genesis. Theory and Practice of Social Developmen, 2013, (12): 91–99. (In Russ.)
12. Nesterova A. A. Socio-psychological approach to the study of the viability of a person in a difficult life situation. Moscow: RGSU, 2011, 236. (In Russ.)
13. Nesterova A. A. Socio-psychological concept of the viability of youth in a situation of job loss. Dr. Psychol. Sci. Diss. Abstr. Moscow, 2011, 49. (In Russ.)
14. Kirillov V. I., Starchenko A. A. Logic, 6th ed. Moscow: TK Velbi; Prospekt, 2008, 240. (In Russ.)
15. Ananiev B. G. Man as a subject of knowledge, 3rd ed. St. Petersburg: Piter, 2010, 288. (In Russ.)
16. Slobodchikov V. I., Isaev E. I. Foundations of psychological anthropology. Human psychology: An introduction to the psychology of subjectivity. Moscow: Shkola-Press, 1995, 384. (In Russ.)
17. Vasilieva S. N. Design of the definition of the category "resilience of person" with triadic decryption method. Vestnik IuzhnoUralskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriia: Psikhologiia, 2019, 12(1): 16–27. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.14529/psy190102
18. Jaspers K. Philosophische Autobiographie. Werk und Wirkung. München,1963, 12–36.
19. Jaspers K. The origin and goal of history. Moscow: Politizdat, 1991, 527. (In Russ.)
20. Glasersfeld E. von. Radical constructivism: A way of knowing and learning. London: The Falmer Press, 1985, 341.
21. Tillich P. Selected: Theology of Culture. Moscow: Iurist, 1995, 479. (In Russ.)
22. Bugental J. The search for existential identity: patient-therapist dialogues in humanistic psychotherapy. Moscow: Korvet, 2017, 332. (In Russ.)
23. Wasserman L. I., Iovlev B. V., Karpova E. B., Vuks A. Ia. Psychological diagnostics of attitudes towards the disease. St. Petersburg: SPb NIPI im. V. M. Bekhtereva, 2005, 32. (In Russ.)
24. Kulagina I. Yu., Senkevich L. V. Rehabilitation potential of personality in various chronic diseases. Cultural-Historical Psychology, 2015, 11(1): 50–60. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17759/chp.2015110107
25. Etkind A. M. Color test of relations. General psychodiagnostics, ed. Bodalev A. A. St. Petersburg: Rech, 2006, 221–227. (In Russ.)
26. Goetzke E. When your patient is in denial? The American Journal of Nursing, 1995, 9: 18–21.
27. Sobchik L. N. Color selection method. Modification of M. Luscher's eight-color test. St. Petersburg: Rech, 2010, 128. (In Russ.)
28. Braem G. Psychology of color. Moscow: AST; Astrel, 2011, 158. (In Russ.)
29. Breslav G. E. Color psychology and color therapy. St. Petersburg: B.&К., 2000, 212. (In Russ.)
30. Sawin M. M. The family cluster model of family enrichment. Building family strengths: Blueprints for action, eds. Stinnett N., Chesser B., De Frain J. University of Nebraska Press, 1979, 163–172.
31. McCubbin H. I., Patterson J. M. The family stress process: The Double ABCX model of adjustment and adaptation. Marriage & Family Review, 1983, 6(1-2): 7–37. https://doi.org/10.1300/J002v06n01_02
Review
For citations:
Rogacheva T.V. Factors Affecting the Viability of Disabled COVID-19 Patients. The Bulletin of Kemerovo State University. 2021;23(3):717-728. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2021-23-3-717-728
Views:
398
Email this article 