Preview

SibScript

Advanced search

Psychological Determinants of Virtual Personality Image

https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2021-23-3-705-716

Abstract

 The transitivity of the modern world triggers new forms of interpersonal interaction. Virtual image is an important part of on-line social cognition. The present research featured factors that determine the construction of virtual personality, its psychological characteristics, functions, and patterns. The authors identified and described three groups of conditions that shape virtual personality, i.e. environmental, functional, and psychological. The latter play the most important role in the image formation process. They define relations in small groups, self-attitude, self-esteem, focus, and motivation. The authors developed a questionnaire of Substantive and Compositional Features of Virtual Personality. The study also involved the Personality in Virtual Space questionnaire and the methods of diagnostics of interpersonal relations and self-attitude. The statistical analysis of the experimental data was based on Varimax rotation. The psychological determinants appeared to be closely related to each other and were grouped into seven factors. 

About the Author

E. O. Rasina
Fevzi Yakubov Crimean Engineering and Pedagogical University
Russian Federation

Simferopol 



References

1. Reshenin S. A. Virtual personality as the main actor and as an element of virtual communities' social structure. Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2013, (2-1): 243–248. (In Russ.)

2. Luchinkina A. I. Psychological patterns of personality socialization in virtual space. Simferopol: IP Hoteeva L. V., 2018, 407. (In Russ.)

3. Pikuleva O. A. Self-presentation of personality in the space of Internet communications. World, personality, and information: perspectives of interdisciplinary research: Proc. All-Russian Sci.-Prac. Conf., St. Petersburg, 14–15 Nov 2013. St. Petersburg: RGPU im. A. I. Herzena, 2014, 55–58. (In Russ.)

4. Panferov V. N. Human Psychology: Soul and Body. Organism and psyche. Functions of the psyche. The structure of the psyche. St. Petersburg: Mikhailov, 2002, 252. (In Russ.)

5. Wu Y.-C. J., Chang W.-H., Yuan C.-H. Do Facebook profile pictures reflect user’s personality? Computers in Human Behavior, 2015, 51(PB): 880–889. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.014

6. Belinskaya E. P., Zhichkina A. E. Self-presentation strategies on the Internet and their relationship with real identity. CYBERPSY, 30 Aug 2017. Available at: https://cyberpsy.ru/articles/self-presentation_identity/ (accessed 1 Jun 2021). (In Russ.)

7. Egorova V. I. Virtual space – a platform for implementation of virtual images. Russian linguistic bulletin, 2020, (2): 111–114. https://doi.org/10.18454/RULB.2020.22.2.9

8. Sekerin V. D., Dudin M. N., Gorokhova A. E., Gaiduk V. I., Volkov V. I. Creation of a virtual image: digital technology of the 21st century. Amazonia Investiga, 2019, 8(20): 340–348.

9. Frindte W., Köhler T. Public construction of Self in computer-mediated communication. Humanitarian studies in the Internet, ed. Voiskunsky A. E. Moscow, 2000, 40–54. (In Russ.)

10. Mamedov A. K., Korkiya E. D. Identity in virtual reality: new alternatives. Theory and Practice of Social Development, 2017, (2): 9–12. (In Russ.)

11. Thomas Sh. A virtual life: how social media changes our perceptions. The Chicago School of Professional Psychology, 7 Oct 2016. Available at: https://www.thechicagoschool.edu/insight/from-the-magazine/a-virtual-life/ (accessed 9 May 2021).

12. Becker B. To be in touch or not? Some remarks on communication in virtual environments. Paper presented at the 6th International IFIP-Conference, 1997.

13. Reid E. M. Cultural formations in text-based virtual realities. A thesis submitted in fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts. University of Melbourne, 1994. Available at: http://www.aluluei.com/cult-form.htm (accessed 9 May 2021).

14. Soldatova E. L., Pogorelov D. N. The phenomenon of virtual identity: the contemporary condition of the problem. The Education and Science Journal, 2018, 20(5): 105–124. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2018-5-105-124

15. Suler J. Identity management in cyberspace. Journal of Applied Psychoanalytic Studies, 2002, 4(4): 455–459. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020392231924

16. Donath J. S. Identity and deception in the virtual community. Communities in Cyberspace, eds. Kollock P., Smith M. London: Routledge, 1996. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/2512169_Identity_and_Deception_in_the_Virtual_Community (accessed 9 May 2021).

17. Turkle Sh. Looking toward Cyberspace: beyond grounded sociology. Cyberspace and Identity, 1999, 28(6): 643–648.

18. Peikari N., Lotfi R., Makhdomi H. Social networks, cyberspace and formation of virtual identity of the users. International Journal of Advanced Studies in Humanities and Social Science, 2015, 4(2): 92–101.

19. Adibi M., Yazdkhast B., Farahmand M. Globalization with an emphasis on youth social identity Isfahan, national studies. International Journal of Advanced Studies in Humanities and Social Science, 2008, 9(3): 99–118.

20. Turkle Sh. Alone together. Why we expect more from technology and less from each other. N. Y.: Basic Books, 2012, 384.

21. Voiskounsky A. E., Evdokimenko A. S., Fedunina N. Yu. Alternative identity in social networks. Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta. Seriya 14. Psikhologiya, 2013, (1): 66–83. (In Russ.)

22. Belinskaya E. P. Internet and personality identification structures. PORTALUS.RU, 24 Jan 2005. Available at: https://portalus.ru/modules/psychology/rus_readme.php?subaction=showfull&id=1106582602&archive=1129709116&start_from=&ucat=& (accessed 1 Jun 2021). (In Russ.)

23. Afanasyeva V. V. Totality of the virtual. Saratov: Nauchnaia kniga, 2005, 103. (In Russ.)

24. Clemenson G. D., Wang L., Mao Z., Stark Sh. M., Stark C. E. L. Exploring the spatial relationships between real and virtual experiences: what transfers and what doesn't. 2020. https://doi.org/10.3389/frvir.2020.572122

25. Perov E. V. The virtual image of the personality. Social and economic systems, 2019, (2): 5–20. (In Russ.)

26. Afanasyeva V. V. Homo Virtualis: psychological characteristics. Izvestiya of Saratov University. Philosophy. Psychology Pedagogy, 2010, 10(2): 59–64. (In Russ.)

27. Jamali R. Online Arab Spring: social media and fundamental change. London: Chandos Publishing, 2014, 200.

28. Young K. S. What makes the Internet addictive: potential explanations for pathological Internet use. Paper presented at the 105th annual conference of the American Psychological Association, 15 Aug 1997, Chicago, IL. Available at: https://www.healthyplace.com/addictions/center-for-internet-addiction-recovery/what-makes-the-internet-addictive-potencial (accessed 9 May 2021).

29. Belinskaya E. P., Gavrichenko O. V. Self-presentation in virtual space: phenomenology and regularities. Psikhologicheskie Issledovaniya, 2018, 11(60). Available at: http://psystudy.ru/index.php/num/2018v11n60/1606-belinskaya60.html (accessed 4 Jun 2021). (In Russ.)

30. Solodovnik V. A. The effect of Internet communications on the personality of the user. Scientific potential of students in the XXI century: Proc. IV Intern. Sci. Conf., Stavropol, 23–24 April 2010. Stavropol: SevKavGTU, 2010, 405–408. (In Russ.)

31. Pantileev S. R. Self-attitude as an emotional-evaluative system. Мoscow: MGU, 1991, 110. (In Russ.)


Review

For citations:


Rasina E.O. Psychological Determinants of Virtual Personality Image. The Bulletin of Kemerovo State University. 2021;23(3):705-716. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2021-23-3-705-716

Views: 405


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2949-2122 (Print)
ISSN 2949-2092 (Online)