Time Attitude in Senior Students with Different Levels of Subjective Well-Being and Optimism
https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2021-23-3-673-681
Abstract
The research featured the way time attitude depend on the levels of subjective well-being and optimism. The attitude manifested as temporal freedom, dependence, and infantilism. The authors believe that attitude to one's time can be an indicator of one’s subjective well-being and optimism. The survey included 297 senior students (age 21–22, 154 female subjects) of the Ugra State University (Khanty-Mansiysk) and the Kurgan branch of the Russian Academy of National Economy and Public Administration under the President of the Russian Federation (Kurgan). All the participants were citizens of Russia. The study employed a set of methods, including authentic versions of The Scale of Attitude to Time and The Scale of Optimism of Personality, as well as The Scale of Subjective Well-Being adapted by M.V. Sokolova. The study established the interdependence of subjective well-being and optimism with time attitude represented by temporary freedom, dependence, and infantilism. Optimists saw time as a resource for activity and demonstrated no obsession with time management and control. Students with a sense of well-being and optimism had low temporal dependence; those with moderate levels of well-being and optimism had higher levels of temporal dependence; those with low levels of subjective well-being demonstrated high levels of temporal dependence. Time attitude proved to be an effective indicator of subjective well-being. For instance, flexible attitude to time management reflected subjective well-being. Time dependence indicated subjective disadvantage and pessimism. Temporal infantilism, i.e. irrational attitude to time management, was typical of senior students with increased self-esteem, poor selfunderstanding, non- acceptance, and rejection of difficulties.
About the Authors
S. V. DukhnovskyRussian Federation
Khanty-Mansiysk
E. V. Zabelina
Russian Federation
Chelyabinsk
References
1. Golovakha Е. I., Kronik А. А. Psychological time of the personality. Kiev: Naukova Dumka, 1984, 207. (In Russ.)
2. Abulkhanova K. A., Berezina T. N. Personality time and time of life. St. Petersburg: Aleteiia, 2001, 304. (In Russ.)
3. Kovalev V. I. Category of time in psychology (personal aspect). Categories of materialistic dialectics in psychology, ed. Antsyferova L. I. Moscow: Nauka, 1988, 216–230. (In Russ.)
4. Zimbardo F., Bojd J. The time paradox: the new psychology of time that will change your life. St. Petersburg: Rech, 2010, 352. (In Russ.)
5. Nesterova S. B. Theoretical approaches to the concept of "psychological time". PEM: Psychology. Educology. Medicine, 2019, (1): 159–169. (In Russ.)
6. Gorkaya Zh. V. Sociocultural analysis of the psychology of perception of time. Vestnik Samarskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2014, (9): 245–250. (In Russ.)
7. Kravtsova Y. V., Dubovitskaya T. D., Abdullin A. G. Psychological time and self-efficacy of the individual. Psychology. Psychophysiology, 2020, 13(3): 17–23. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.14529/jpps200302
8. Pecherskaya S. A. Psychological time as the psychological aspect of health of the individual. Vestnik universiteta, 2014, (21): 292–297. (In Russ.)
9. Nestik T. A. Group view to time as a socio-psychological phenomenon. The Bulletin of Irkutsk State University. Series Psychology, 2015, 14: 10–30. (In Russ.)
10. Zabelina E. V. Time in the perception of modern youth: a reflection of postmodernism culture. The Humanities (Yalta), 2018, (4): 17–23. (In Russ.)
11. Kuzmina O. V. The technique of diagnostics of personal time disorganizers. Psikhologicheskie Issledovaniya, 2011, (6). Available at: http://www.psystudy.ru/index.php/num/2011-n-620/569-kuzmina20.html (accessed 20 Jul 2021). (In Russ.)
12. Vechkanova E. M. Specificity of the individual's temporal perspective at various levels of experiencing an identity crisis. Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2014, (4-2): 117–122. (In Russ.)
13. Vechkanova E. M. Methodological prerequisites for investigation of value-semantic determinants of person's time perspective. Sovremennye issledovaniia sotsialnykh problem, 2015, (3): 61–75. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.12731/2218-7405-2015-3-7
14. Gurova O. S. Features of the time perspective of people with chronic diseases. Health, Physical Culture and Sports, 2019, (5): 14–24. (In Russ.)
15. Chevrenidi A. A. Features of time perspective among managers of different levels. Organizational Psychology, 2019, 7(1): 83–96. (In Russ.)
16. Yanitskiy M. S., Seryy A. V., Braun O. A., Balabashchuk R. O. Chronotopic characteristics of the image of the world during the COVID-19 pandemic. Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2021, 23(2): 466–476. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2021-23-2-466-476
17. Klochko V. E., Krasnoryadtseva O. M., Khvan N. V. Individual psychological characteristics of two types of chronotypical organization of human lifeworld. Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2015, (3-3): 148–154. (In Russ.)
18. Mendelevich V. D. Psychology of deviant behavior. St. Petersburg: Rech, 2005, 445. (In Russ.)
19. Smirnov A. V. Psychology of addictive behavior. Ekaterinburg: Ural. gos. ped. un-t, 2014, 379. (In Russ.)
20. Shamionov R. M. Psychology of subjective well-being of the individual. Saratov: Izd-vo Sarat. un-ta, 2004, 180. (In Russ.)
21. Kulikov L. V. Psychogygiene of personality. Issues of psychological stability and psychoprophylaxis. St. Petersburg: Piter, 2004, 464. (In Russ.)
22. Dzhidaryan I. A. Psychology of happiness and optimism. Moscow: IP RAN, 2013, 267. (In Russ.)
23. Muzdybaev K. Optimism and pessimism of personality (experience of social and psychological research). Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, 2003, (12): 87–95. (In Russ.)
24. Seligman M. New positive psychology: Scientific view for luck and sense life. Moscow: Sofiia, 2006, 368. (In Russ.)
25. Posokhova S. T. Optimism. Psychological content of optimism and its meaning for personality. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Psychology. Sociology. Pedagogy, 2009, (1-1): 5–16. (In Russ.)
26. Dukhnovsky S. V., Mishchenko V. A. Optimism: resource and personality deviation. Vestnik Kaluzhskogo universiteta, 2021, (2): 128–135. (In Russ.)
27. Sokolova M. V. Scale of subjective well-being: leadership, 2nd ed. Yaroslavl: Psikhodiagnostika, 1996, 14. (In Russ.)
28. Kulikov L. V. A guide to methods for diagnosing mental states, moods, and the sphere of feelings. Procedure description and manual. St. Petersburg: SPbGU, 2003, 81. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Dukhnovsky S.V., Zabelina E.V. Time Attitude in Senior Students with Different Levels of Subjective Well-Being and Optimism. The Bulletin of Kemerovo State University. 2021;23(3):673-681. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2021-23-3-673-681