Preview

SibScript

Advanced search

Corpus-Based Research of Simple Non-Inverted Pronominal Interrogative Constructions in English

https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2021-23-2-477-485

Abstract

 The research featured nuclear models of pronominal interrogative sentences with direct word order in the English language. The use of non-inverted interrogative structures depends on the analytical character of English. The  partial subjectpredicate inversion is the main means of interrogativity. However,  interrogative sentences with direct word order are quite common in colloquial English. The violation of the inverted word order reflects the phenomenon of language economy and can be explained by expressive and stylistic tasks. Although violation of word order in declarative sentences is a popular research topic, the subject-predicate inversions in interrogative sentences remain largely understudied in domestic and foreign linguistics. The research involved a modified corpus analysis. Based on the Corpus of Contemporary American English, the author established the frequency of pronominal interrogative structures with direct word order, analyzed their grammatical features, and defined the most popular genres, which appeared to be the discourse of television and cinema. The obtained results make it possible to develop a formal classification of non-inverted pronominal and non-pronominal constructions. 

About the Author

Ye. N. Vorobyova
Vologda Institute of Law and Economics of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia
Russian Federation

 Vologda 



References

1. Saidova M. S. The communicative function of the interrogative sentence in modern English. Cand. Philol. Sci. Diss. Tashkent, 1987, 189. (In Russ.)

2. Kaushanskaya V. L., Kovner R. L., Kozhevnikova O. N., Prokofieva E. V., Reines Z. M., Skvirskaya S. E., Tsyrlina F. Ya. A grammar of the English language, 8th ed. Moscow: Airis-press, 2016, 384. (In Russ.)

3. Arnold I. V. Stylistics. The modern English language, 13th ed. Moscow: FLINTA, 2016, 384. (In Russ.)

4. Danilova I. B. The phenomenon of inversion in modern English. Cand. Philol. Sci. Diss. Abstr. Leningrad, 1969, 14. (In Russ.)

5. Ganshina M., Vasilevskaya N. English Grammar, 7th ed. Moscow: Foreign languages publ. house, 1951, 471.

6. Smirnitskii A. I. English language syntax. Moscow: Librokom, 2019, 294. (In Russ.)

7. Ilyish B. The structure of modern English. Moscow-Leningrad: Progress Publishers, 1971, 654.

8. Trofimova E. A. Structural features of English colloquial speech. Rostov-on-Don: Molot, 1972, 99. (In Russ.)

9. Davydova N. A. Inversion in the English discourse. Vestnik of Moscow state linguistic university, 2011, (633): 88–94. (In Russ.)

10. Karashaeva B. B. Stylistic inversion as a means of expression of emotion and expressiveness in the English literature of the XIX–XX centuries. Aktualnye problemy iazykoznaniia, 2015, 1: 46–48. (In Russ.)

11. Zhiber E. V. Expressive Inversion in the English Language. Vestnik of Moscow state linguistic university. Humanitarian sciences, 2020, (11): 81–91.

12. Chen R. English inversion: a ground-before-figure construction. N. Y.: Mouton de Gruyter, 2003, 333.

13. Ivanova I. P., Chakhoyan L. P, Belyaeva T. M. History of the English language, 3rd ed. St. Petersburg: Avalon, Azbuka-klassika, 2006, 560. (In Russ.)

14. Sadykova G. V. Word order: functional aspect: the case of electronic newspaper texts in Russian and English. Cand. Philol. Sci. Diss. Abstr. Kazan, 2005, 22. (In Russ.)

15. Sergeeva Yu. M., Syresina I. O. A students’ guide to English syntax: from word to discourse. Moscow: MPGU, 2018, 204. (In Russ.)

16. Dorgeloh H. Inversion in modern English: form and function. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamin Publishing Company, 1997, 234.

17. Green G. M. Colloquial and literary uses of inversions. Illinois: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1981, 88.

18. Uvarova T. K. Inversion in English. Matters of lexicology and grammar of foreign languages, ed. Tur V. I. Minsk: Vyssh. shk., 1963, 126–135. (In Russ.)

19. Birner B. J. The discourse function of inversion in English. N. Y.-London: Routledge Taylor and Francis Group, 2012, 204.

20. Bloch M. Ia. Optional positions and zero forms in paradigmatic syntax. Problemy sintaksisa angliiskogo iazyka. Uch. zap. MGPI im. V. I. Lenina, 1970, 422: 75–105. (In Russ.)

21. Ezikeeva E. M. Stylistic function of elliptic sentences in dialogues. Nauchnye itogi goda: dostizheniia. proekty. gipotezy, 2011, (1-2): 60–64. (In Russ.)

22. Okovitaya Yu. F. Expressive syntactic constructions in the advertising language: structure-value relationship. Cand. Philol. Sci. Diss. Krasnodar, 2004, 143. (In Russ.)

23. Vorobyova Y. N. Elliptical interrogative structures (on the English language material). Jazyk i kul'tura, 2019, (48): 87–103. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.17223/19996195/48/6

24. Kozlova N. V. Linguistic corpus: typology and terms. Vestnik NSU. Series: Linguistics and Intercultural Communication, 2013, 11(1): 79–88. (In Russ.)

25. Zakharov V. P., Bogdanova S. Yu. Corpus linguistics, 3rd ed. St. Petersburg: Izd-vo S.-Peterb. un-ta, 2020, 234. (In Russ.)

26. Kochetova L. A. Statistics in corpus linguistics. Theoretical and applied aspects of corpus research, ed. Kochetova L. A. Volgograd: VolGU, 2016, 5–14. (In Russ.)

27. Zakharov V. P. Corpus linguistics. St. Petersburg: Izd-vo SPbGU, 2005, 48. (In Russ.)

28. Jespersen O. Essentials of English grammar. London: The Wren Press, 2013. 390.

29. Roberts P. English syntax. An introduction to transformational grammar. N. Y.: Harcourt, Brace & World, 1964, 414.

30. Barkhudarov L. S., Shteling D. A. The English grammar. Moscow: Vyssh. shk., 1973, 423. (In Russ.)

31. Bloch M. Ia. Communicative types of sentences in the aspect of thematic-rhematic articulation. Inostrannye iazyki v shkole, 1976, (5): 14–23. (In Russ.)

32. Bloch M. Ia. Theoretical outline of English grammar. Moscow: Vyssh. shk., 2005, 239. (In Russ.)


Review

For citations:


Vorobyova Ye.N. Corpus-Based Research of Simple Non-Inverted Pronominal Interrogative Constructions in English. The Bulletin of Kemerovo State University. 2021;23(2):477-485. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2021-23-2-477-485

Views: 440


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2949-2122 (Print)
ISSN 2949-2092 (Online)